IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gai/ppaper/ppaper-2025-1509.html

Progressiveness Assessment of the Value Added Tax in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Belev

    (RANEPA)

  • Konstantin Vekerle

    (RANEPA)

  • Sergey Sinelnikov

    (VAVT)

Abstract

The issue of tax burden distribution among the population is frequently discussed in Russia. In particular, some authors argue that the VAT burden is regressive and advocate for expanding the list of goods subject to the reduced VAT rate. However, most of these studies focus on comparing aggregate consumption and disposable income as tax bases. This paper, by contrast, concentrates on identifying which categories of expenditure in Russia are subject to progressive or regressive VAT treatment, as such estimates can inform proposals for specific tax design reforms. To analyse the structure of VAT burden distribution, data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS), conducted by the Higher School of Economics, is employed. Total consumption expenditure is divided into the following categories: current consumption, expenditure on durable goods, investments in human capital, and spending on entertainment and leisure. Based on the distributional analysis, it is found that the structure of household consumption remained stable over the period from 2007 to 2019. During periods of declining income, a decrease in the progressivity of the VAT scale is observed. This is due to higher-income groups reducing their expenditure on durable goods in favour of current consumption and investments in human capital – both of which are often subject to zero or reduced VAT rates. Among all categories, only investments in human capital display a regressive VAT burden distribution. VAT design proves to be progressive for spending on leisure and entertainment, primarily due to the inclusion of expenditure on tourist trips, which are subject to the standard VAT rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Belev & Konstantin Vekerle & Sergey Sinelnikov, 2025. "Progressiveness Assessment of the Value Added Tax in Russia," Published Papers ppaper-2025-1509, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:gai:ppaper:ppaper-2025-1509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/ppaper/ppaper-2025-1509.pdf
    File Function: Revised Version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Koehne, 2018. "On The Taxation Of Durable Goods," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 825-857, May.
    2. Spencer Bastani & Sebastian Koehne, 2024. "How Should Consumption Be Taxed?," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 80(3), pages 259-302.
    3. André Decoster & Jason Loughrey & Cathal O'Donoghue & Dirk Verwerft, 2010. "How regressive are indirect taxes? A microsimulation analysis for five European countries," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 326-350.
    4. Cremer, Helmuth & Gahvari, Firouz, 2015. "Atkinson and Stiglitz theorem in the presence of a household production sector," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 91-95.
    5. Julien Blasco & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2023. "The inequality impact of consumption taxes: An international comparison," Post-Print hal-04316442, HAL.
    6. Nanak Kakwani & Hyun Hwa Son, 2021. "Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity: an International Comparison," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(1), pages 185-212, March.
    7. Teodora Boneva & Christopher Rauh, 2018. "Parental Beliefs about Returns to Educational Investments—The Later the Better?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(6), pages 1669-1711.
    8. Nicola Amendola & Giovanni Vecchi, 2022. "Durable goods and welfare measurement," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1179-1211, September.
    9. Biroli, Pietro & Boneva, Teodora & Raja, Akash & Rauh, Christopher, 2022. "Parental beliefs about returns to child health investments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 33-57.
    10. Julien Blasco & Elvire Guillaud & Michaël Zemmour, 2023. "The inequality impact of consumption taxes: An international comparison," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04316442, HAL.
    11. Mocan, Naci, 2019. "Taxes and culture of leisure: Impact on labor supply in Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 618-639.
    12. Theodore C. Bergstrom, 1996. "Economics in a Family Way," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(4), pages 1903-1934, December.
    13. Deaton, Angus, 1979. "Optimally uniform commodity taxes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 357-361.
    14. Orazio Attanasio & Sarah Cattan & Emla Fitzsimons & Costas Meghir & Marta Rubio-Codina, 2020. "Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Colombia," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 48-85, January.
    15. Amy Finkelstein & Sarah Taubman & Bill Wright & Mira Bernstein & Jonathan Gruber & Joseph P. Newhouse & Heidi Allen & Katherine Baicker, 2012. "The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(3), pages 1057-1106.
    16. Ingvil Gaarder, 2019. "Incidence and Distributional Effects of Value Added Taxes," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 853-876.
    17. Madsen, Jakob B., 2016. "Health, Human Capital Formation And Knowledge Production: Two Centuries Of International Evidence," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 909-953, June.
    18. Rostislav I. Kapeliushnikov, 2019. "Is economic inequality a universal evil?," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 4.
    19. Olovsson, Conny, 2015. "Optimal taxation with home production," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 39-50.
    20. Atkinson, A. B. & Stiglitz, J. E., 1976. "The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1-2), pages 55-75.
    21. Leonardo Becchetti & Fabio Pisani, 2021. "When Money Matters More: Long‐Term Illness and the Income/Life Satisfaction Slope," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(3), pages 616-638, September.
    22. Rosenzweig, Mark R, 1995. "Why Are There Returns to Schooling?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 153-158, May.
    23. Blasco, Julien & Guillaud, Elvire & Zemmour, Michaël, 2023. "The inequality impact of consumption taxes: An international comparison," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    24. Orazio Attanasio & Teodora Boneva & Christopher Rauh, 2022. "Parental Beliefs about Returns to Different Types of Investments in School Children," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(6), pages 1789-1825.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantin V. Vekerle & Sergei G. Belev & Sergei G. Sinelnikov-Murylev, 2025. "Progressiveness Assessment of the Value Added Tax in Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 9(4), pages 23-36, October.
    2. Spencer Bastani & Sebastian Koehne, 2024. "How Should Consumption Be Taxed?," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 80(3), pages 259-302.
    3. Lanterna, Federica & Ricci, Mattia, 2025. "Taxing fairly or failing badly? Reduced VAT rates and redistribution," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Ricci Mattia & Lanterna Federica, 2026. "Taxing Fairly or Failing Badly? Reduced VAT Rates and Redistribution," JRC Working Papers on Taxation & Structural Reforms 2026-02, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Francesco Agostinelli & Ciro Avitabile & Matteo Bobba, 2025. "Enhancing Human Capital in Children: A Case Study on Scaling," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(2), pages 455-491.
    6. Bratta, Barbara & Carta, Silvia & Di Caro, Paolo & Manzo, Marco & Orecchia, Carlo, 2025. "Welfare and equity impact of consumption tax policies: A micro-macro-economic approach applied to Italy," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    7. Jonas Lau-Jensen Hirani & Hans Henrik Sievertsen & Miriam Wüst & Johannes Wohlfart, 2020. "Missing a Nurse Visit," Discussion Papers 20-09, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    8. Hüseyin Şen & Ayşe Kaya, 2026. "Does a revenue-neutral shift from indirect to direct taxes reduce inequality? Evidence from high-income OECD countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 1-48, February.
    9. Jonas Lau-Jensen Hirani & Hans Henrik Sievertsen & Miriam Wust, 2020. "The Timing of Early Interventions and Child and Maternal Health," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 20/720, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    10. Bhalotra, Sonia & Delavande, Adeline & Font-Gilabert, Paulino & Maselko, Joanna, 2020. "Maternal investments in children: the role of expected effort and returns," ISER Working Paper Series 2020-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    11. Mukherjee, Sacchidananda, 2025. "Distributional Impact of Indian GST based on the NSSO's Household Consumption Expenditure Survey of 2022-23," Working Papers 25/430, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    12. Ersoy, Fulya, 2023. "Effects of perceived productivity on study effort: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 376-391.
    13. John A. List & Ragan Petrie & Anya Samek, 2023. "How Experiments with Children Inform Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 504-564, June.
    14. Hirani, Jonas Cuzulan & Sievertsen, Hans Henrik & Wüst, Miriam, 2020. "Missing a Nurse Visit," IZA Discussion Papers 13485, IZA Network @ LISER.
      • Miriam Wüst & Jonas Lau-Jensen Hirani & Hans Henrik Sievertsen, 2021. "Missing a Nurse Visit," CEBI working paper series 20-09, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    15. Cunha, Flávio & Elo, Irma & Culhane, Jennifer, 2022. "Maternal subjective expectations about the technology of skill formation predict investments in children one year later," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 3-32.
    16. Agostinelli, Francesco & Avitabile, Ciro & Bobba, Matteo, 2021. "Enhancing Human Capital at Scale," IZA Discussion Papers 14192, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse & Pia Pinger, 2026. "Mentoring and Schooling Decisions: Causal Evidence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 134(1), pages 366-396.
    18. Sebastian Gallegos & Pablo Celhay, 2020. "Early Skill Effects on Types of Parental Investments and Long-Run Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-014, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    19. John List & Julie Pernaudet & Dana Suskind, 2021. "It All Starts with Beliefs: Addressing the Roots of Educational Inequities by Changing Parental Beliefs," Framed Field Experiments 00740, The Field Experiments Website.
    20. Falch, Ranveig, 2021. "How Do People Trade Off Resources Between Quick and Slow Learners?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 5/2021, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • H71 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gai:ppaper:ppaper-2025-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aleksei Astakhov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gaidaru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.