IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/pngfwp/182348.html

Scoping report: Understanding the fresh produce value chain in Papua New Guinea

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Emily
  • Anamo, Iga
  • Gimiseve, Harry
  • Kedir Jemal, Mekamu
  • Minten, Bart
  • Monoi, Belinda
  • Mukerjee, Rishabh
  • Sikas-Iha, Helmtrude

Abstract

The Government of Papua New Guinea (GoPNG) aims to promote agricultural transformation through strategic investments to support greater commercialization via increases in production output and quality. To accomplish this goal, the GoPNG recently released the National Agriculture Sector Plan (NASP) 2024-2033 which acknowledges the fresh produce sector’s potential to contribute to poverty alleviation and economic growth via increased income for rural farmers (Department of Agriculture and Livestock 2023). With growing urbanization and expanding mining operations, the demand for fresh produce is increasing within the country (Chang et al. 2015). While the challenges that PNG faces to promote a more competitive fresh produce agriculture sector are not simple hurdles to overcome, they are not impossible barriers to surpass either. This report sets out to achieve three goals: 1) provide an assessment of PNG’s fresh produce farming and sales trends using remote sensing data and recent data collected by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Fresh Produce Development Agency (FPDA); 2) report on current programming (namely Market for Village Farmers) aimed at supporting fresh produce value chain development; and 3) inform future programming of fresh produce value chain support through a detailed account of a scoping study of the fresh produce sector conducted in June, 2025 and November, 2025.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Emily & Anamo, Iga & Gimiseve, Harry & Kedir Jemal, Mekamu & Minten, Bart & Monoi, Belinda & Mukerjee, Rishabh & Sikas-Iha, Helmtrude, 2026. "Scoping report: Understanding the fresh produce value chain in Papua New Guinea," Papua New Guinea food policy strengthening working papers 12, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:pngfwp:182348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/182348
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Sandra & Jagadish, Ayyamani, 2006. "Agricultural Marketing and Agribusiness Supply Chain Issues in Developing Economies: The Case of Fresh Produce in Papua New Guinea," 2006 Conference, August 24-25, 2006, Nelson, New Zealand 31956, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    2. Kosec, Katrina & Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung & Schmidt, Emily & Song, Jie, 2021. "Perceptions of relative deprivation and women’s empowerment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Tittonell, P. & van Wijk, M.T. & Rufino, M.C. & Vrugt, J.A. & Giller, K.E., 2007. "Analysing trade-offs in resource and labour allocation by smallholder farmers using inverse modelling techniques: A case-study from Kakamega district, western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 76-95, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jindřich Špička & Tomáš Vintr & Renata Aulová & Jana Macháčková, 2020. "Trade-off between the economic and environmental sustainability in Czech dual farm structure," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 243-250.
    2. World Bank & International Finance Corporation, 2014. "The Fruit of Her Labor : Promoting Gender-Equitable Agribusiness in Papua New Guinea," World Bank Publications - Reports 21085, The World Bank Group.
    3. Berkhout, Ezra D. & Schipper, Robert A. & Kuyvenhoven, Arie & Coulibaly, Ousmane, 2009. "Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect allocative and technical efficiency? A case study in Northern Nigeria," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51676, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Cortez-Arriola, José & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter A.H. & Scholberg, Johannes M.S. & Améndola Massiotti, Ricardo D. & Tittonell, Pablo, 2016. "Alternative options for sustainable intensification of smallholder dairy farms in North-West Michoacán, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 22-32.
    5. Grabowski, Philip & Jayne, Thomas S., "undated". "Analyzing Trends In Herbicide Use In Sub-Saharan Africa," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259050, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    6. McDonald, C.K. & MacLeod, N.D. & Lisson, S. & Corfield, J.P., 2019. "The Integrated Analysis Tool (IAT) – A model for the evaluation of crop-livestock and socio-economic interventions in smallholder farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Homann-Kee Tui, Sabine & Valbuena, Diego & Masikati, Patricia & Descheemaeker, Katrien & Nyamangara, Justice & Claessens, Lieven & Erenstein, Olaf & van Rooyen, Andre & Nkomboni, Daniel, 2015. "Economic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabwe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 48-60.
    8. Kanter, David R. & Musumba, Mark & Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Palm, Cheryl & Antle, John & Balvanera, Patricia & Dale, Virginia H. & Havlik, Petr & Kline, Keith L. & Scholes, R.J. & Thornton, Philip & Titton, 2018. "Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 73-88.
    9. Arouna Dissa & Jos Bijman & Maja Slingerland & Ousmane Mama Sanogo & Ken E Giller & Katrien Descheemaeker, 2022. "Growing cotton to produce food: Unravelling interactions between value chains in southern Mali," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    10. Maurizio Prosperi & Roberta Sisto & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Xueqin Zhu, 2018. "Production of bioplastics for agricultural purposes: A supply chain study," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 119-136.
    11. Schmidt, Emily & Anamo, Iga & Gimiseve, Harry & Hayoge, Glen & Kedir Jemal, Mekamu & Monoi, Belinda & Mukerjee, Rishabh & Sikas-Iha, Helmtrude, 2026. "Synopsis: Evolution of and opportunities for the fresh produce value chain in PNG," Papua New Guinea food policy strengthening working papers 14, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Komarek, Adam M. & Bell, Lindsay W. & Whish, Jeremy P.M. & Robertson, Michael J. & Bellotti, William D., 2015. "Whole-farm economic, risk and resource-use trade-offs associated with integrating forages into crop–livestock systems in western China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 63-72.
    13. Giller, K.E. & Tittonell, P. & Rufino, M.C. & van Wijk, M.T. & Zingore, S. & Mapfumo, P. & Adjei-Nsiah, S. & Herrero, M. & Chikowo, R. & Corbeels, M. & Rowe, E.C. & Baijukya, F. & Mwijage, A. & Smith,, 2011. "Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 191-203, February.
    14. Valbuena, Diego & Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee & Erenstein, Olaf & Teufel, Nils & Duncan, Alan & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Swain, Braja & Mekonnen, Kindu & Germaine, Ibro & Gérard, Bruno, 2015. "Identifying determinants, pressures and trade-offs of crop residue use in mixed smallholder farms in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 107-118.
    15. Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Oomen, Gerard J.M. & Rossing, Walter A.H., 2012. "Multi-objective optimization and design of farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 63-77.
    16. Michel Kabirigi & Haruna Sekabira & Zhanli Sun & Frans Hermans, 2023. "The use of mobile phones and the heterogeneity of banana farmers in Rwanda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5315-5335, June.
    17. Leonardo, Wilson & van de Ven, Gerrie W.J. & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Giller, Ken E., 2018. "Can farming provide a way out of poverty for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 240-251.
    18. Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Mateus Batistella & James D. A. Millington & Emilio Moran & Luiz A. Martinelli & Yue Dou & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Three Decades of Changes in Brazilian Municipalities and Their Food Production Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Maria Tsiouni & Stamatis Aggelopoulos & Alexandra Pavloudi & Dario Siggia, 2021. "Economic and Financial Sustainability Dependency on Subsidies: The Case of Goat Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Ezra D. Berkhout & Robert A. Schipper & Arie Kuyvenhoven & Ousmane Coulibaly, 2010. "Does heterogeneity in goals and preferences affect efficiency? A case study of farm households in northern Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 265-273, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:pngfwp:182348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.