IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedpdp/101848.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Well Do Survey Self-Reports Align with Administrative Data? The Case of U.S. Consumer Credit Records

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper assesses how closely consumers’ self-reported credit and debt attributes (such as credit account ownership and balances) align with administrative credit bureau records for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards. Understanding the contents of one’s credit report can be critical to consumers’ ability to obtain affordable credit and to their ability to manage their finances generally. Surveys often ask respondents to report the types and amounts of credit they have, but it is often difficult or impossible to determine if the reported information is accurate. In this paper, we examine how well individuals’ self-reported credit activities in surveys correspond to the administrative data in their credit bureau files. We use anonymized survey data linked with individual-level administrative credit records to assess the levels of agreement between the two data sources for key credit-related attributes — such as credit seeking, credit account ownership, and outstanding balances — across several widely used credit products, such as credit cards, mortgages, and auto loans. We find that survey self-reports generally align well with administrative data, with a large majority of respondents reporting the composition and balances of their existing credit accounts as well as new credit applications in a manner consistent with their credit records. Agreement between the two data sources is generally higher for credit seeking and account ownership than for account balances, higher for installment loans than for revolving credit, and higher for credit products used more frequently than those used less often. When there is disagreement, there is a greater tendency to underreport rather than overreport in surveys, especially for account balances. Additionally, more often than not, demographic characteristics do not explain the level of agreement or disagreement between self-reports and credit records.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Akana & Amber Lee, 2025. "How Well Do Survey Self-Reports Align with Administrative Data? The Case of U.S. Consumer Credit Records," Consumer Finance Institute discussion papers 101848, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpdp:101848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/FRBP/Assets/Consumer-Finance/Discussion-Papers/dp25-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpdp:101848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beth Paul (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbphus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.