IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedbqu/102319.html

A Framework for Understanding the Vulnerabilities of New Money-Like Products

Author

Listed:

Abstract

New money-like products, such as tokenized money market funds (MMFs), money market exchange-traded funds (MMETFs), and stablecoins, could be transformative for finance. These products may offer significant benefits, but like other money-like assets, they also have certain vulnerabilities. We introduce a framework to analyze the vulnerabilities of new products by comparing their features to those that contribute to vulnerabilities in MMFs. Specifically, we examine the extent to which each product engages in liquidity transformation, is subject to threshold effects, serves as a money-like asset, poses contagion risks, and has reactive investors. Our framework is useful for assessing the potential effects of novel cash-like products on the overall resilience of the financial system and how such an assessment may change as these products’ uses evolve.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenechukwu E. Anadu & Patrick E. McCabe & JP Perez-Sangimino & Nathan Swem, 2026. "A Framework for Understanding the Vulnerabilities of New Money-Like Products," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers SRA 26-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:102319
    DOI: 10.29412/res.wp.2025.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/risk-and-policy-analysis/2026/a-framework-for-understanding-the-vulnerabilities-of-new-money-like-products.aspx
    File Function: Summary
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/2026/SRA2601.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29412/res.wp.2025.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anadu, Kenechukwu & Levin, John & Lu, Lina & Malfroy-Camine, Antoine & Oefele, Nico, 2025. "Are retail prime money market fund investors increasingly more sensitive to stress events?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Goldstein, Itay & Jiang, Hao & Ng, David T., 2017. "Investor flows and fragility in corporate bond funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 592-613.
    3. Kenechukwu E. Anadu & Pablo D. Azar & Catherine Huang & Marco Cipriani & Thomas M. Eisenbach & Gabriele La Spada & Mattia Landoni & Marco Macchiavelli & Antoine Malfroy-Camine & J. Christina Wang, 2023. "Runs and Flights to Safety: Are Stablecoins the New Money Market Funds?," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers SRA 23-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, revised 26 Mar 2024.
    4. Kenechukwu Anadu & Mathias Kruttli & Patrick McCabe & Emilio Osambela, 2020. "The Shift from Active to Passive Investing: Risks to Financial Stability?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 23-39, October.
    5. Kenechukwu E. Anadu & Mathias S. Kruttli & Patrick E. McCabe & Emilio Osambela & Chaehee Shin, 2018. "The Shift from Active to Passive Investing: Potential Risks to Financial Stability?," Supervisory Research and Analysis Working Papers RPA 18-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    6. Chen, Qi & Goldstein, Itay & Jiang, Wei, 2010. "Payoff complementarities and financial fragility: Evidence from mutual fund outflows," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 239-262, August.
    7. Oefele, Nico & Baur, Dirk G. & Smales, Lee A., 2024. "Flight-to-quality—Money market mutual funds and stablecoins during the March 2023 banking crisis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Jiageng Liu & Igor Makarov & Antoinette Schoar, 2023. "Anatomy of a Run: The Terra Luna Crash," NBER Working Papers 31160, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Strahan, Philip E. & Tanyeri, Başak, 2015. "Once Burned, Twice Shy: Money Market Fund Responses to a Systemic Liquidity Shock," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1-2), pages 119-144, April.
    10. Gary Gorton, 2017. "The History and Economics of Safe Assets," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 547-586, September.
    11. Bengt Holmstrom, 2015. "Understanding the role of debt in the financial system," BIS Working Papers 479, Bank for International Settlements.
    12. Lei Li & Yi Li & Marco Macchiavelli & Xing (Alex) Zhou, 2021. "Liquidity Restrictions, Runs, and Central Bank Interventions: Evidence from Money Market Funds [Dealer financial conditions and lender-of-last-resort facilities]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(11), pages 5402-5437.
    13. Fernando Avalos & Dora Xia, 2021. "Investor size, liquidity and prime money market fund stress," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, March.
    14. Baghai, Ramin P. & Giannetti, Mariassunta & Jäger, Ivika, 2022. "Liability Structure and Risk Taking: Evidence from the Money Market Fund Industry," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(5), pages 1771-1804, August.
    15. Patrick E. McCabe & Marco Cipriani & Michael Holscher & Antoine Martin, 2013. "The Minimum Balance at Risk: A Proposal to Mitigate the Systemic Risks Posed by Money Market Funds," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 44(1 (Spring), pages 211-278.
    16. Sergey Chernenko & Adi Sunderam, 2014. "Frictions in Shadow Banking: Evidence from the Lending Behavior of Money Market Mutual Funds," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(6), pages 1717-1750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Bouveret & Antoine Martin & Patrick E. McCabe, 2022. "Money Market Fund Vulnerabilities: A Global Perspective," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-012, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Voellmy, Lukas, 2024. "Preventing runs under sequential revelation of liquidity needs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Capotă, Laura-Dona & Grill, Michael & Molestina Vivar, Luis & Schmitz, Niklas & Weistroffer, Christian, 2022. "Is the EU money market fund regulation fit for purpose? Lessons from the COVID-19 turmoil," Working Paper Series 2737, European Central Bank.
    4. Breckenfelder, Johannes & Schepens, Glenn, 2025. "From purchases to exit: central bank interventions in corporate debt markets," Working Paper Series 3055, European Central Bank.
    5. Fricke, Daniel & Greppmair, Stefan & Paludkiewicz, Karol, 2024. "You can’t always get what you want (where you want it): Cross-border effects of the US money market fund reform," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Marco Cipriani & Gabriele La Spada, 2020. "Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Runs," Staff Reports 956, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    7. Fernando M. Linardi, 2020. "Investors’ Behavior and Mutual Fund Portfolio Allocations in Brazil during the Global Financial Crisis," Working Papers Series 517, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    8. Cipriani, Marco & La Spada, Gabriele, 2021. "Investors’ appetite for money-like assets: The MMF industry after the 2014 regulatory reform," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 250-269.
    9. Xuesong Huang & Todd Keister, 2025. "Can Redemption Fees Prevent Runs on Funds?," Staff Reports 1160, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    10. Timmermann, Allan & Schmidt, Lawrence & , & Wermers, Russ, 2017. "Transparency, Investor Information Acquisition, and Money Market Fund Risk Rebalancing during the 2011-12 Eurozone Crisis," CEPR Discussion Papers 11895, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Sirio Aramonte & Andreas Schrimpf & Hyun Song Shin, 2023. "Non-bank financial intermediaries and financial stability," Chapters, in: Refet S. Gürkaynak & Jonathan H. Wright (ed.), Research Handbook of Financial Markets, chapter 7, pages 147-170, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Linardi, Fernando M., 2020. "Investors’ behavior and mutual fund portfolio allocations in Brazil during the global financial crisis," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    13. Kenechukwu E. Anadu & Pablo D. Azar & Catherine Huang & Marco Cipriani & Thomas M. Eisenbach & Gabriele La Spada & Mattia Landoni & Marco Macchiavelli & Antoine Malfroy-Camine & J. Christina Wang, 2023. "Runs and Flights to Safety: Are Stablecoins the New Money Market Funds?," Staff Reports 1073, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    14. Xiaole Tong & Jingfei Wang, 2023. "Does the Development of Money Market Funds in China Increase the Bank Liquidity Risk?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7.
    15. Marco Cipriani & Gabriele La Spada, 2017. "Investors’ appetite for money-like assets: the money market fund industry after the 2014 regulatory reform," Staff Reports 816, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    16. Abbas Hejri, 2022. "On the recent developments of mutual funds with fixed‐income holdings: a systematic review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2313-2338, June.
    17. Sirio Aramonte, 2025. "The case for supporting liquidity supply in (some corners of) non-bank intermediation," International Finance Discussion Papers 1425, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    18. Chernenko, Sergey & Sunderam, Adi, 2020. "Do fire sales create externalities?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 602-628.
    19. Qian, Meijun & Tanyeri, Başak, 2017. "Litigation and mutual-fund runs," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 119-135.
    20. Qi Chen & Itay Goldstein & Zeqiong Huang & Rahul Vashishtha, 2024. "Liquidity Transformation and Fragility in the U.S. Banking Sector," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(6), pages 3985-4036, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E50 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - General
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbqu:102319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.