IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedadr/87813.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 2016 and 2017 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Angrisani
  • Kevin Foster
  • Marcin Hitczenko

Abstract

This document serves as the technical appendix to the 2016 and 2017 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice administered by the Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR). The Survey of Consumer Payment Choice (SCPC) is an annual study designed primarily to collect data on attitudes toward and use of various payment instruments by consumers over the age of 18 in the United States. The main report, which introduces the survey and discusses the principal economic results, is on our website at frbatlanta.org/banking-and-payments/consumer-payments/survey-of-consumer-payment-choice. In this data report, we detail the technical aspects of the survey design, implementation, and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2020. "The 2016 and 2017 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2018-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedadr:87813
    DOI: 10.29339/rdr2018-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.frbatlanta.org/-/media/documents/banking/consumer-payments/research-data-reports/2018/the-2016-and-2017-surveys-of-consumer-payment-choice-technical-appendix/rdr1804.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29339/rdr2018-04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcin Hitczenko, 2015. "Identifying and evaluating sample selection bias in consumer payment surveys," Research Data Report 15-7, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    3. Frees,Edward W., 2004. "Longitudinal and Panel Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521535380.
    4. Frees,Edward W., 2004. "Longitudinal and Panel Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521828284.
    5. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2014. "The 2011 and 2012 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 14-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    6. Marcin Hitczenko, 2013. "Modeling anchoring effects in sequential Likert scale questions," Working Papers 13-15, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    7. Joanna Stavins, 2016. "The effect of demographics on payment behavior: panel data with sample selection," Working Papers 16-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim Huynh & Gradon Nicholls & Mitchell Nicholson, 2020. "2019 Cash Alternative Survey Results," Discussion Papers 2020-8, Bank of Canada.
    2. Marie-Hélène Felt & Fumiko Hayashi & Joanna Stavins & Angelika Welte, 2020. "Distributional Effects of Payment Card Pricing and Merchant Cost Pass-through in the United States and Canada," Research Working Paper RWP 20-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    3. Marie-Hélène Felt & Fumiko Hayashi & Joanna Stavins & Angelika Welte, 2021. "Distributional Effects of Payment Card Pricing and Merchant Cost Pass-through in Canada and the United States," Staff Working Papers 21-8, Bank of Canada.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2017. "The 2015 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 17-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2016. "The 2014 survey of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 16-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    3. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2015. "The 2013 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 15-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    4. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2017. "The 2012 diary of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 17-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    5. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2013. "The 2010 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 13-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    6. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2014. "The 2011 and 2012 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 14-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    7. Öztürk, Gamze & Yetkiner, Hakan & Özden, Elif, 2020. "Macroeconomic determinants of antidepressant use," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1394-1407.
    8. Marcin Hitczenko, 2015. "Estimating population means in the 2012 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice," Research Data Report 15-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    9. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2018. "The 2015 and 2016 diaries of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 18-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    10. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2014. "Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 749-758.
    11. Naima Chrid & Sami Saafi & Mohamed Chakroun, 2021. "Export Upgrading and Economic Growth: a Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 811-841, June.
    12. Patricio Aroca & Juan Gabriel Brida & Juan Sebastián Pereyra & Serena Volo, 2014. "Tourism statistics: correcting data inadequacy using coarsened exact matching," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS22, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    13. Fulvia Pennoni & Beata Bal-Domańska, 2022. "NEETs and Youth Unemployment: A Longitudinal Comparison Across European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 739-761, July.
    14. Rodrigo V. Ventura & Manoela Cabo & Rafael Caixeta & Elton Fernandes & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes, 2020. "Air Transportation Income and Price Elasticities in Remote Areas: The Case of the Brazilian Amazon Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Lynn, Peter & Bosch, Oriol, 2021. "Methodological lessons from the pilot longitudinal survey on debt advice," ISER Working Paper Series 2021-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    16. Caudill, Jonathan W. & Getty, Ryan & Smith, Rick & Patten, Ryan & Trulson, Chad R., 2013. "Discouraging window breakers: The lagged effects of police activity on crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 18-23.
    17. Adolfo Maza & Paula Gutiérrez-Portilla, 2022. "Outward FDI and exports relation: A heterogeneous panel approach dealing with cross-sectional dependence," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 170, pages 174-189.
    18. Abayomi Oredegbe, 2022. "Competition and Banking Industry Stability: How Do BRICS and G7 Compare?," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 21(1), pages 7-31, March.
    19. Maliyamu Abudureheman & Qingzhe Jiang & Xiucheng Dong & Cong Dong, 2022. "CO 2 Emissions in China: Does the Energy Rebound Matter?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Edward Frees & Jee-Seon Kim, 2006. "Multilevel Model Prediction," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 79-104, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    survey design; sample selection; raking; survey cleaning; poststratification estimates;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • E4 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedadr:87813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rob Sarwark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbatus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.