IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedbdr/17-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 2012 diary of consumer payment choice: technical appendix

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Angrisani
  • Kevin Foster
  • Marcin Hitczenko

Abstract

This document serves as the technical appendix to the 2012 Diary of Consumer Payment Choice administered by the RAND Corporation. The Diary of Consumer Payment Choice (DCPC) is a study designed primarily to collect data on financial transactions over a three-day period by consumers over the age of 18 in the United States. In this data report, we detail the technical aspects of the survey design, implementation, and analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2017. "The 2012 diary of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 17-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedbdr:17-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/-/media/Documents/Workingpapers/PDF/2017/rdr1705.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/research-data-report/2017/the-2012-diary-of-consumer-payment-choice-technical-appendix.aspx
    File Function: Summary
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire Greene & Shaun O'Brien & Scott Schuh, 2017. "U. S. consumer cash use, 2012 and 2015: an introduction to the Diary of Consumer Payment Choice," Research Data Report 17-6, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. Marcin Hitczenko, 2015. "Identifying and Evaluating Sample Selection Bias in Consumer Payment Surveys," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2015-07, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    3. Nicole Jonker & Anneke Kosse, 2009. "The impact of survey design on research outcomes: A case study of seven pilots measuring cash usage in the Netherlands," DNB Working Papers 221, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    4. Frees,Edward W., 2004. "Longitudinal and Panel Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521535380, June.
    5. Frees,Edward W., 2004. "Longitudinal and Panel Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521828284, June.
    6. Schmidt, Tobias, 2011. "Fatigue in payment diaries - empirical evidence from Germany," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2011,11, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    7. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2014. "The 2011 and 2012 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2014-02, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    8. Naeem Ahmed & Matthew Brzozowski & Thomas Crossley, 2006. "Measurement errors in recall food consumption data," IFS Working Papers W06/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2018. "The 2015 and 2016 diaries of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 18-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. Claire Greene & Scott Schuh, 2017. "The 2016 Diary of Consumer Payment Choice," Research Data Report 17-7, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    3. Claire Greene & Joanna Stavins, 2020. "The 2017 Diary of Consumer Payment Choice," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2018-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2018. "The 2015 and 2016 diaries of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 18-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    2. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2016. "The 2014 survey of consumer payment choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 16-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    3. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2017. "The 2015 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: technical appendix," Research Data Report 17-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    4. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2020. "The 2016 and 2017 Surveys of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2018-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    5. Marco Angrisani & Kevin Foster & Marcin Hitczenko, 2015. "The 2013 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice: Technical Appendix," Consumer Payments Research Data Reports 2015-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    6. Djamel Merlat, 2008. "Entre 'préférence nationale' et allégeance partisane: le long parcours d'intégration des néo-frontistes," Cahiers du CEVIPOL/Brussels Working papers 131715, Centre d'étude de la vie politique (CEVIPOL) of the Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Meng, Chang & Ghafoori, Noorulhaq, 2024. "The economic impact of terrorism in South Asia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Van de Woestyne, Ignace, 2014. "Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 749-758.
    9. Naima Chrid & Sami Saafi & Mohamed Chakroun, 2021. "Export Upgrading and Economic Growth: a Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 811-841, June.
    10. Patricio Aroca & Juan Gabriel Brida & Juan Sebastián Pereyra & Serena Volo, 2014. "Tourism statistics: correcting data inadequacy using coarsened exact matching," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS22, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    11. Fulvia Pennoni & Beata Bal-Domańska, 2022. "NEETs and Youth Unemployment: A Longitudinal Comparison Across European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 739-761, July.
    12. D T Barnum & J M Gleason & B Hemily & J Lin & P Wang, 2010. "Progressing from uncertainty to risk for DEA-based decisions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1548-1555, October.
    13. Hapsah S. Mohammad & Imbarine Bujang & Taufik Abd Hakim, 2019. "Capital Structure and Financial Performance of Malaysian Construction Firms," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(12), pages 1306-1319, December.
    14. Rodrigo V. Ventura & Manoela Cabo & Rafael Caixeta & Elton Fernandes & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes, 2020. "Air Transportation Income and Price Elasticities in Remote Areas: The Case of the Brazilian Amazon Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Lynn, Peter & Bosch, Oriol, 2021. "Methodological lessons from the pilot longitudinal survey on debt advice," ISER Working Paper Series 2021-03, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    16. Kaiwen Wang & Jiehui Ding & Kristen R. Lidwell & Scott Manski & Gee Y. Lee & Emilio Xavier Esposito, 2019. "Treatment Level and Store Level Analyses of Healthcare Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, April.
    17. Caudill, Jonathan W. & Getty, Ryan & Smith, Rick & Patten, Ryan & Trulson, Chad R., 2013. "Discouraging window breakers: The lagged effects of police activity on crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 18-23.
    18. Rogers Matama, 2017. "Frugality, Family-Cohesiveness and Firm Growth; A Case of Small Firms around Oil & Gas Fields in Uganda," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(6), pages 188-205.
    19. Marcin Hitczenko, 2021. "Improved Estimation of Poisson Rate Distributions through a Multi-Mode Survey Design," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2021-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    20. Aynur Pala, 2016. "Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 28-34.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    poststratification estimates; survey design; raking; survey cleaning; sample selection;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • E4 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedbdr:17-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Spozio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbbous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.