IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/exe/wpaper/2401.html

How and Why Dictators Forestall Democratization Using International Trade Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Kishore Gawande

    (Department of Business, Government and Society, University of Texas, Austin)

  • Ben Zissimos

    (Department of Economics, University of Exeter)

Abstract

On 'how' dictatorships use international trade policy to forestall democratization, our theory endogenizes the threat of revolution in a dictatorship to a world food price shock. The dictatorship then aim to neutralize the threat and forestall democratization using trade taxes. On 'why', we show that if a dictatorship were to introduce domestic redistributive fiscal capacity, they would make it more difficult to forestall democratization, hence undermining their own rule. The data and econometric results show that dictatorships do indeed follow this logic, while liberal democracies behave differently. We also find 'partial democracies' behave like dictatorships and not like liberal democracies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kishore Gawande & Ben Zissimos, 2023. "How and Why Dictators Forestall Democratization Using International Trade Policy," Discussion Papers 2401, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:2401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://exetereconomics.github.io/RePEc/dpapers/DP2401.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt Allcott & Michael Greenstone, 2012. "Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 3-28, Winter.
    2. Kelly C. Bishop & Nicolai V. Kuminoff & H. Spencer Banzhaf & Kevin J. Boyle & Kathrine von Gravenitz & Jaren C. Pope & V. Kerry Smith & Christopher D. Timmins, 2020. "Best Practices for Using Hedonic Property Value Models to Measure Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(2), pages 260-281.
    3. Nada Wasi & Aaron Flaaen, 2015. "Record linkage using Stata: Preprocessing, linking, and reviewing utilities," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 15(3), pages 672-697, September.
    4. Alecia Cassidy, 2023. "How Does Mandatory Energy Efficiency Disclosure Affect Housing Prices?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(3), pages 655-686.
    5. Fuerst, Franz & McAllister, Patrick & Nanda, Anupam & Wyatt, Peter, 2015. "Does energy efficiency matter to home-buyers? An investigation of EPC ratings and transaction prices in England," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 145-156.
    6. Matteo Iacoviello & Stefano Neri, 2010. "Housing Market Spillovers: Evidence from an Estimated DSGE Model," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 125-164, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guimaraes, Bernardo & Sheedy, Kevin D., 2024. "Institutional specialization," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arpita Ghosh & Brendon McConnell & Jaime Millán-Quijano, 2024. "Do Homebuyers Value Energy Efficiency? Evidence From an Information Shock," Discussion Papers 2402, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    2. Stangenberg, Lennart & van Wickeren, Sjors & Zhang, Lu, 2026. "The information value of energy labels: Evidence from the Dutch residential housing market," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Carroll, James & Denny, Eleanor & Lyons, Ronan C. & Petrov, Ivan, 2024. "Better energy cost information changes household property investment decisions: Evidence from a nationwide experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. James Carroll & Claudia Aravena & Marco Boeri & Eleanor Denny, 2022. "“Show Me the Energy Costs†: Short and Long-term Energy Cost Disclosure Effects on Willingness-to-pay for Residential Energy Efficiency," The Energy Journal, , vol. 43(3), pages 133-152, May.
    5. Andreas Mense, 2018. "The Value of Energy Efficiency and the Role of Expected Heating Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(3), pages 671-701, November.
    6. Hilber, Christian A.L. & Palmer, Charles & Pinchbeck, Edward W., 2019. "The energy costs of historic preservation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Lu Zhang & Lennart Stangenberg & Sjors van Wickeren, 2020. "The information value of energy labels: Evidence from the Dutch residential housing market," CPB Discussion Paper 413.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Im, Jongho & Seo, Youngme & Cetin, Kristen S. & Singh, Jasmeet, 2017. "Energy efficiency in U.S. residential rental housing: Adoption rates and impact on rent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1021-1033.
    9. Damen, Sven & van Kempen, Tijmen, 2025. "Mandatory energy efficiency disclosure policies and house prices," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan, 2020. "Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to energy savings in the building sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Rosenow, Jan & Bayer, Edith, 2017. "Costs and benefits of Energy Efficiency Obligations: A review of European programmes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 53-62.
    12. Singhal, Puja & Sommer, Stephan & Kaestner, Kathrin & Pahle, Michael, 2023. "Split-incentives in energy efficiency investments? Evidence from rental housing," Ruhr Economic Papers 992, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    13. Bishop, Kelly C. & Kiribrahim-Sarikaya, Ozgen, 2024. "Energy-efficient investments in housing," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Sébastien Houde & Joseph Maher, 2018. "Moral Hazard and the Energy Efficiency Gap: Theory and Evidence," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(4), pages 755-790.
    15. Liang Wong, Ing & Krüger, Eduardo, 2017. "Comparing energy efficiency labelling systems in the EU and Brazil: Implications, challenges, barriers and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 310-323.
    16. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet, 2018. "Energy efficiency as a credence good: A review of informational barriers to building energy savings," Working Papers 2018.07, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    17. Singhal, Puja & Sommer, Stephan & Kaestner, Kathrin & Pahle, Michael, 2025. "Split-incentives in energy efficiency investments? Evidence from rental housing," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Sébastien Houde & Joseph Maher, 2018. "Moral Hazard and the Energy Efficiency Gap: Theory and Evidence," Working Papers hal-01420872, HAL.
    19. Kuang, Pei, 2014. "A model of housing and credit cycles with imperfect market knowledge," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 419-437.
    20. Fankhauser, Samuel & Jotzo, Frank, 2017. "Economic growth and development with low-carbon energy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86850, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
    • F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:exe:wpaper:2401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sebastian Kripfganz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deexeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.