IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ekd/002672/4002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation at the firm level when the level of technological development of the home country differs: Evidence for 19 EU countries

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Unterlass
  • Andreas Reinstaller

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of innovation behaviour at the firm level across countries with different levels of technological development. The literature has argued mostly from a macroeconomic perspective (e.g. Silverberg and Verspagen 1995, Acemoglu – Aghion – Zillibotti 2002, Aghion and Howitt 2006, Lazonick 2002, 2008) that with the proximity to the technological frontier the importance of cutting edge innovation activities increases for the aggregate growth path of countries. Only investment in advanced knowledge generation and basic research will allow countries to forge ahead. On the other hand, farther off the technological frontier technology absorption is necessary and sufficient to generate growth and catch up with more advanced economies in terms of GDP per capita. Based on this logic several authors have proposed that there is a need for institutions that are commensurate to the level of technological development of a country in order to support economic development and growth adequately.Whereas analyses based on aggregate or sectoral data seem to support this view, comprehensive analyses on the firm level have not been available to this date. This contribution tries to fill this gap. The paper presents a simple stylised model on the innovation decision at the firm level that is used to develop the principal hypotheses that are then tested econometrically using data from the Community Innovation Survey for 19 European countries. The analysis focuses on three aspects: the relationship between activities related to technology transfer and R&D, the relative importance of different types of knowledge sources and the degree of technological complexity of production in an industry across countries. Drawing on results of a prior paper (Reinstaller and Unterlass 2011) we group firm level data into larger country groups that have been identified through a statistical cluster analysis using aggregate data on direct and indirect R&D data from an input-output analysis. These groups capture differences in the level of technological development across countries. For each of these groups we fit the identical econometric models and test the hypothesis that the estimated coefficients are identical.The results show that the marginal effects of both the level of total innovation expenditures and the share of R&D investment in total innovation investment increase monotonically across country groups with the level of technological development of the country. The same strictly monotonic relationship is observed for indicators capturing the importance of firm specific capabilities. On the other hand, no such relationship can be observed for knowledge stemming from market sources or suppliers. These factors are of similar importance (in terms of the level, direction and significance of the marginal effects) across country groups. Surprisingly knowledge from academic institutions and government labs or indicators capturing the closeness to basic research of the knowledge sources upon which the firm draws are both statistically and economically not significant. The reasons for this finding are discussed in the paper. Finally, the results also show that the claim often made by academics and policy makers that R&D activities are necessary to promote innovation also in technologically less advanced countries is not confirmed by our econometric results. The interaction effects between the share of R&D in total innovation investments and total innovation investments is positive and significant only for the country group of the technologically most advanced countries while it is statistically not significant for all other country groups suggesting that a positive complementary relationship between technology transfer and R&D arises only at relatively high levels of technological development. All these results are very robust across different specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Unterlass & Andreas Reinstaller, 2012. "Innovation at the firm level when the level of technological development of the home country differs: Evidence for 19 EU countries," EcoMod2012 4002, EcoMod.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecomod.net/system/files/Ecomod_Paper%20Reinstaller%20Unterlass.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Griffith & Elena Huergo & Jacques Mairesse & Bettina Peters, 2006. "Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 483-498, Winter.
    2. Tor Jakob Klette & Samuel Kortum, 2004. "Innovating Firms and Aggregate Innovation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(5), pages 986-1018, October.
    3. Francis Vella, 1998. "Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 127-169.
    4. Krueger, Dirk & Kumar, Krishna B., 2004. "US-Europe differences in technology-driven growth: quantifying the role of education," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 161-190, January.
    5. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Mairesse, Jacques, 1995. "Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 263-293, January.
    6. Papke, Leslie E & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M, 1996. "Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 619-632, Nov.-Dec..
    7. Mazzoleni, Roberto & Nelson, Richard R., 2007. "Public research institutions and economic catch-up," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1512-1528, December.
    8. Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2012. "Comparing business R&D across countries over time: a decomposition exercise using data for the EU 27," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(12), pages 1143-1148, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    19 European countries (EU): BE; BG; CZ; DE; DK; EE; ES; FI; GR; HU; IS; IT; LT; LU; LV; PT; RO; SE; SI; Miscellaneous; EU enlargement;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekd:002672:4002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theresa Leary). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecomoea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.