IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/59336.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Management practices and the quality of care in cardiac units

Author

Listed:
  • McConnell, K. John
  • Lindrooth, Richard C.
  • Wholey, Douglas R.
  • Maddox, Thomas M.
  • Bloom, Nicholas

Abstract

Importance:- To improve the quality of health care, many researchers have suggested that health care institutions adopt management approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing and technology sectors. However, relatively little information exists about how these practices are disseminated in hospitals and whether they are associated with better performance. Objectives:- To describe the variation in management practices among a large sample of hospital cardiac care units; assess association of these practices with processes of care, readmissions, and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); and suggest specific directions for the testing and dissemination of health care management approaches. Design:- We adapted an approach used to measure management and organizational practices in manufacturing to collect management data on cardiac units. We scored performance in 18 practices using the following 4 dimensions: standardizing care, tracking of key performance indicators, setting targets, and incentivizing employees. We used multivariate analyses to assess the relationship of management practices with process-of-care measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30-day readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Setting:- Cardiac units in US hospitals. Participants_ Five hundred ninety-seven cardiac units, representing 51.5% of hospitals with interventional cardiac catheterization laboratories and at least 25 annual AMI discharges. Main Outcome Measures:- Process-of-care measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30-day readmissions for AMI. Results:- We found a wide distribution in management practices, with fewer than 20% of hospitals scoring a 4 or a 5 (best practice) on more than 9 measures. In multivariate analyses, management practices were significantly correlated with mortality (P = .01) and 6 of 6 process measures (P

Suggested Citation

  • McConnell, K. John & Lindrooth, Richard C. & Wholey, Douglas R. & Maddox, Thomas M. & Bloom, Nicholas, 2013. "Management practices and the quality of care in cardiac units," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59336, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:59336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59336/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:6335 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Harlan M. Krumholz & Angela R. Merrill & Eric M. Schone & Geoffrey C. Schreiner & Jersey Chen & Elizabeth H. Bradley & Yun Wang & Yongfei Wang & Zhenqiu Lin & Barry M. Straube & Michael T. Rapp & Shar, "undated". "Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f7843a224adc47a1b345f9191, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sacarny, Adam, 2018. "Adoption and learning across hospitals: The case of a revenue-generating practice," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 142-164.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2017. "Healthy Business? Managerial Education and Management in Healthcare," NBER Working Papers 23880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Amitabh Chandra & Amy Finkelstein & Adam Sacarny & Chad Syverson, 2016. "Health Care Exceptionalism? Performance and Allocation in the US Health Care Sector," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(8), pages 2110-2144, August.
    4. Angelis, Jannis & Häger Glenngård, Anna & Jordahl, Henrik, 2017. "Management Practices and the Quality of Primary Care," Working Paper Series 1174, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Kalodimos, Jonathan, 2017. "Internal governance and performance: Evidence from when external discipline is weak," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 193-216.
    6. Arimoto, Yutaka & Kurata, Masamitsu, 2017. "Adoption of Management Practices in the Public Sector of Bangladesh," Discussion Paper Series 654, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Wang, Yongjin & Zhao, Laixun, 2015. "Saving good jobs from global competition by rewarding quality and efforts," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 426-434.
    8. Janet M. Currie & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2018. "Understanding Doctor Decision Making: The Case of Depression," NBER Working Papers 24955, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Lee, Yong Suk, 2018. "Modern management and the demand for technical skill," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 328-343.
    10. Emek Basker & Randy A. Becker & Lucia Foster & T. Kirk White & Alice Zawacki, 2019. "Addressing Data Gaps: Four New Lines of Inquiry in the 2017 Economic Census," Working Papers 19-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    11. Manhal Ali & Reza Salehnejad & Mohaimen Mansur, 2018. "Hospital heterogeneity: what drives the quality of health care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(3), pages 385-408, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:59336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (LSERO Manager). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.