IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/29035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trust and voluntary organisations: three theoretical approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Anheier, Helmut K.
  • Kendall, Jeremy

Abstract

The notion of trust is one of the most topical issues in current social science theorising covering such diverse approaches as transaction costs economics, social capital, and cognitive sociology. In different ways and for different purposes, these approaches address the role of voluntary and nonprofit organisations, although, as this paper argues, much of this thinking remains sketchy and underdeveloped. At the same time, the notion of trust has long played a central role in the economics of non-profit organisations, yet these developments have not been fully linked with the wider effort mentioned above. The purpose of this paper is to explore what non-profit approaches can offer trust theories, and vice versa. We first set out to explicate major approaches to trust in economics, sociology and political science, using the non-profit or voluntary organisation as a focal point. We then assess the various approaches in terms of their strengths and weaknesses, and, finally, identify key areas for theoretical advancement in an effort to enrich current theorising. In particular, we point to the social movement literature, the social psychology of trust, and recent thinking about civil society as fruitful avenues for theoretical advancement in our understanding this phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Anheier, Helmut K. & Kendall, Jeremy, 2000. "Trust and voluntary organisations: three theoretical approaches," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29035, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:29035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29035/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helmut Anheier & Avner Ben-Ner, 1997. "Shifting Boundaries: Long-term changes in the size of the for-profit, nonprofit, cooperative and government sectors," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 335-353, September.
    2. Susan Rose-Ackerman, 1996. "Altruism, Nonprofits, and Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 701-728, June.
    3. James, Estelle, 1986. "The private nonprofit provision of education: A theoretical model and application to Japan," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 255-276, September.
    4. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    5. Posnett, John & Sandler, Todd, 1988. "Transfers, transaction costs and charitable intermediaries," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 145-160, December.
    6. Frey, Bruno S, 1997. "A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(443), pages 1043-1053, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan José Barrios, 2011. "Participation in voluntary organizations," Documentos de Investigación 70, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    2. Solange Campos-Romero & Valeria Herskovic & Carolina Fuentes & Esmeralda Abarca, 2020. "Perceptions on Connecting Respite Care Volunteers and Caregivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prasenjit Banerjee & Vegard Iversen & Sandip Mitra & Antonio Nicolò & Kunal Sen, 2018. "Politicians and Their Promises in an Uncertain World: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in India," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1806, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    2. Francois, Patrick, 2000. "'Public service motivation' as an argument for government provision," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 275-299, November.
    3. Petersen, Verner C., 2006. "The Ship of Fools - a society of selfish individuals," Working Papers 2006-4, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    4. Sergio G. Lazzarini & Gary J. Miller & Todd R. Zenger, 2008. "Dealing with the Paradox of Embeddedness: The Role of Contracts and Trust in Facilitating Movement Out of Committed Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 709-728, October.
    5. Hopkins, Michael M. & Nightingale, Paul, 2006. "Strategic risk management using complementary assets: Organizational capabilities and the commercialization of human genetic testing in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 355-374, April.
    6. Blankart, Charles Beat & Gehrmann, Björn, 2006. "Der Dritte Sektor in der Europäischen Union: die Daseinsvorsorge aus ökonomischer Sicht [The third sector in the European Union: an economic perspective on services of general interest]," MPRA Paper 95505, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert, 2007. "Signaling and screening of workers' motivation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 605-624, April.
    8. Pavel Chalupníček, 2008. "Altruismus a sociální podnikatelství - příspěvek k teorii netržních organizací [Altruism and social entrepreneurship - towards a theory of non-market organizations]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(5), pages 643-655.
    9. Lazzarini, Sergio G., 2002. "Moving out of Committed Relationships," Insper Working Papers wpe_31, Insper Working Paper, Insper Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa.
    10. Avner Ben-Ner, 2006. "For-Profit, State and Non-Profit: How to Cut the Pie Among the Three Sectors," Chapters, in: Jean-Philippe Touffut (ed.), Advancing Public Goods, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Schubert, Renate & Blasch, Julia, 2010. "Sustainability standards for bioenergy--A means to reduce climate change risks?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2797-2805, June.
    12. Edward Nissan & Maria-Soledad Castaño & Inmaculada Carrasco, 2012. "Drivers of non-profit activity: a cross-country analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 303-320, April.
    13. Vatn, Arild, 2005. "Rationality, institutions and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 203-217, November.
    14. Susan Rose-Ackerman, "undated". "Trust, Honesty, and Corruption: Reflection on the State-Building Process," Yale Law School John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy Working Paper Series yale_lepp-1013, Yale Law School John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy.
    15. Yang, Chia-yen, 2000. "The organizational choice of public good provision," ISU General Staff Papers 2000010108000013664, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Assaf Razin & Efraim Sadka & Chi-Wa Yuen, 1999. "An Information-Based Model of Foreign Direct Investment: The Gains from Trade Revisited," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 6(4), pages 579-596, November.
    17. Tisdell, Clem, 2014. "Information Technology's Impacts on Productivity, Welfare and Social Change: Second Version," Economic Theory, Applications and Issues Working Papers 195701, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    18. Konduru, Srinivasa & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G. & Magnier, Alexandre, 2009. "GMO Testing Strategies and Implications for Trade: A Game Theoretic Approach," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49594, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. König, Philipp J. & Pothier, David, 2018. "Safe but fragile: Information acquisition, sponsor support and shadow bank runs," Discussion Papers 15/2018, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    20. Andrea Attar & Thomas Mariotti & François Salanié, 2021. "Entry-Proofness and Discriminatory Pricing under Adverse Selection," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(8), pages 2623-2659, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:29035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.