IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140802.html

The returns to education: a reply

Author

Listed:
  • Clark, Gregory
  • Nielsen, Christian Alexander Abildgaard

Abstract

In this response to Lee Crawfurd's comment on The Returns to Education: A Meta-Study, we address his three main criticisms. We contend that estimates based on compulsory schooling laws constitute the most reliable evidence on causal returns to education. We show that our parsimonious approach to correcting for publication bias is preferable to more complex approaches that have biases of their own. Finally, we argue that the observed skewed distribution is most plausibly explained by selective omission of negative estimates. We therefore conclude that the comment does not undermine our central finding that reported returns to education are substantially inflated because of publication bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, Gregory & Nielsen, Christian Alexander Abildgaard, 2026. "The returns to education: a reply," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140802, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140802/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.