IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140272.html

Chinese women artists’ Marxist feminist critique of post-socialist work

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Linzhi

Abstract

Amidst the growing interest in Chinese women artists’ feminist interventions, this article delves into a less-explored theme in their artistic practices: labour. Through a close examination of two artists’ critical engagement with women’s labour in China, I highlight their Marxist feminist concerns. The first artist, Hu Yinping, creates a work utopia that ensures work autonomy for her mother who had taken on precarious part-time jobs after being laid off. The second artist, Feng Lin, appropriates ready-mades derived from a housewife’s life for her critical enquiry into whether domestic labour or home truly shields women from capitalist relations. It is argued that the two artists make women’s problems with work visible in a post-socialist China, where women’s labour becomes increasingly devalued, less conspicuous, and more precarious. Furthermore, both artists experiment with alternatives to capitalist commodified labour. However, it becomes apparent that Hu Yinping cannot sustain her utopian vision without selling her labour as an artist, and Feng Lin demonstrates that a housewife cannot fully escape the capitalist imposition of work. Ultimately, the interventions of these artists serve as a dual critique of capitalist labour and a revelation of its totality.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Linzhi, 2024. "Chinese women artists’ Marxist feminist critique of post-socialist work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140272, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140272/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brendan Burchell & Kirsten Sehnbruch & Agnieszka Piasna & Nurjk Agloni, 2014. "The quality of employment and decent work: definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(2), pages 459-477.
    2. Eli Friedman & Ching Kwan Lee, 2010. "Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30‐Year Retrospective," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 507-533, September.
    3. Yang SONG, 2017. "Six central features of the Chinese labour market: A literature survey," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 156(2), pages 213-242, June.
    4. Limin Wang & Jeni Klugman, 2020. "How women have fared in the labour market with China's rise as a global economic power," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 43-64, January.
    5. Fang Cai & Yang Du & Meiyan Wang, 2013. "Demystify the labor statistics in China," China Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2-3), pages 123-133, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muriel Périsse & Clément Séhier, 2019. "Analysing wages and labour institutions in China: An unfinished transition," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 400-421, September.
    2. Fields, Gary S. & Meng, Xin & Song, Yang, 2022. "Earnings mobility during labor market reforms in urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Salome Asena & Amos Gitau Njuguna & Jennifer Nyakinya, 2026. "Empowering young art entrepreneurs: lowering barriers for decent work in Kenya’s creative industry," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Zeng, Xuanye & Bai, Yunli & Wu, Jiaojiao & Qiu, Yutong & Zhang, Linxiu, 2026. "The impact of Vocational Skills Training of Public Employment Services on off-farm employment: Evidence from rural China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. André Dumas Tsambou & Lionie Mafang & Thierno Malick Diallo & Benjamin Fomba Kamga, 2024. "Impact of job training program on employment outcomes in Senegal," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(8), pages 1-33, August.
    6. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Yuan, Zhengrong & Ding, Hai & Yu, Qiuzuo, 2024. "High temperature, bargaining power and within-firm wage inequality: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Paula Franklin & Wouter Zwysen & Agnieszka Piasna, 2022. "Temporal Dimensions of Job Quality and Gender: Exploring Differences in the Associations of Working Time and Health between Women and Men," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Seghezza, Elena & Morelli, Pierluigi & Pittaluga, Giovanni B., 2017. "Reserve accumulation and exchange rate policy in China: The authoritarian elite's aim of political survival," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-51.
    10. Wenjing Duan & Pedro S. Martins, 2022. "Rent sharing in China: Magnitude, heterogeneity and drivers," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 176-219, March.
    11. Prümer, Stephanie, 2019. "Ist der Staat der bessere Arbeitgeber? Arbeitsqualität im Öffentlichen und Privaten Sektor in Deutschland," Discussion Papers 107, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    12. Luo, Peikun & Chen, Yongqing & Shan, Donglu & Wang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Internet use, social capital and high-quality employment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Francis Green & Golo Henseke, 2019. "Conceiving, designing and trailing a short‐form measure of job quality: a proof‐of‐concept study," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 2-19, January.
    14. Helmerich, Nicole & Raj-Reichert, Gale & Zajak, Sabrina, 2021. "Exercising associational and networked power through the use of digital technology by workers in global value chains," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 142-166.
    15. Amrita Chhachhi & Eli Friedman, 2014. "Alienated Politics: Labour Insurgency and the Paternalistic State in China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 1001-1018, September.
    16. Martin OSTERMEIER & Sarah LINDE & Jann LAY & Sebastian PREDIGER, 2015. "SMARTer indicators for decent work in a post-2015 development agenda: A proposal," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(3), pages 285-302, September.
    17. Laia OLLÉ-ESPLUGA & Johanna MUCKENHUBER & Markus HADLER, 2019. "Job Quality in Economy for the Common Good Firms in Austria and Germany," CIRIEC Working Papers 1921, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    18. Alisha Ralph & Akarsh Arora, 2024. "Mapping the literature on decent work: A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development goal 8," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3937-3952, August.
    19. Reeg, Caroline, 2015. "Micro and small enterprises as drivers for job creation and decent work," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    20. María Daniela Cortés Lancheros & Yennifer Cortés Pedraza & David Rodríguez Guerrero & Cindy Rozo Romero, 2024. "Quality of Employment: A Measure of Workers' Preferences," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 102, pages 165-201, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.