IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/140232.html

‘Reading between the lies’: reading achievement, socioeconomic inequality, and adolescents' resistance to misinformation

Author

Listed:
  • Hossain, Mobarak
  • Jabbari, Jason

Abstract

In this hyperconnected world, misinformation spreads faster and farther than ever before. Adolescents, navigating the challenges of growing up, may be especially vulnerable to the overwhelming flow of digital information, including content on globally shared social media platforms. This study examines adolescents’ resistance to misinformation across 49 countries, using novel measures from the 2022 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) dataset. We construct a composite index of misinformation resistance, capturing aspects such as checking accuracy, comparing sources, and sharing unverified content. Descriptive patterns show that most students compare sources and check accuracy, but many still trust or share unverified information, with notable socioeconomic status (SES) and regional disparities. Multilevel regression models show a positive, significant association between reading achievement and misinformation resistance. Importantly, the SES gap in misinformation resistance is largest among students at the bottom of the reading achievement distribution, but is not significant among those at the top of the achievement distribution. We argue that closing digital literacy gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged students requires investments in both literacy skills and awareness of misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossain, Mobarak & Jabbari, Jason, 2026. "‘Reading between the lies’: reading achievement, socioeconomic inequality, and adolescents' resistance to misinformation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 140232, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/140232/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Aslett & Zeve Sanderson & William Godel & Nathaniel Persily & Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker, 2024. "Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7995), pages 548-556, January.
    2. Anastasia Kozyreva & Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stefan M. Herzog & Ullrich K. H. Ecker & Stephan Lewandowsky & Ralph Hertwig & Ayesha Ali & Joe Bak-Coleman & Sarit Barzilai & Melisa Basol & Adam J. Berin, 2024. "Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 1044-1052, June.
    3. S. Shyam Sundar & Eugene Cho Snyder & Mengqi Liao & Junjun Yin & Jinping Wang & Guangqing Chi, 2025. "Sharing without clicking on news in social media," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 156-168, January.
    4. Sonia Livingstone & Kjartan Ólafsson & Ellen J. Helsper & Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva & Giuseppe A. Veltri & Frans Folkvord, 2017. "Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: the role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68612, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Ali, Ayesha & Qazi, Ihsan Ayyub, 2023. "Countering misinformation on social media through educational interventions: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Pakistan," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Dan M. Kahan & Ellen Peters & Maggie Wittlin & Paul Slovic & Lisa Larrimore Ouellette & Donald Braman & Gregory Mandel, 2012. "The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 732-735, October.
    7. Christensen, Vibeke Tornhøj & Polonijo, Andrea N. & Carpiano, Richard M., 2026. "Parental education disparities in childhood vaccination in Denmark: A test of two explanations for the role of misinformation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).
    8. Eveline A. Crone & Elly A. Konijn, 2018. "Media use and brain development during adolescence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugenio Verrina, 2023. "Upset but (almost) correct: a conceptual replication of Di Tella, Perez-Truglia, Babino and Sigman (2015)," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 327-336, December.
    2. Casey A. Klofstad & Joseph E. Uscinski & Jennifer M. Connolly & Jonathan P. West, 2019. "What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Michel, Hanno, 2020. "From local to global: The role of knowledge, transfer, and capacity building for successful energy transitions," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-603, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    4. Li, Qianwen & Qian, Tingyu & Wang, Hui & Sun, Chuanwang, 2025. "Exploring the value of green: The impact factors on China's second-hand green housing prices based on geographically weighted Lasso regressions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Branden B. Johnson, 2017. "Explaining Americans’ responses to dread epidemics: an illustration with Ebola in late 2014," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1338-1357, October.
    6. Kevin Wong & Geoff Walton & Gavin Bailey, 2021. "Using information science to enhance educational preventing violent extremism programs," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(3), pages 362-376, March.
    7. Rebecca Page & Lisa Dilling, 2020. "How experiences of climate extremes motivate adaptation among water managers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 499-516, August.
    8. E. Keith Smith & Adam Mayer, 2019. "Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 17-34, January.
    9. Morrison, Mark & Duncan, Roderick & Parton, Kevin A., 2013. "Targeting segments in the Australian community to increase support for climate change policy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 212-217.
    10. Anthony Evans & Willem Sleegers & Žan Mlakar, 2020. "Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 401-412, May.
    11. Leung, B. T. K., 2018. "Limited Cognitive Ability and Selective Information Processing," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1891, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Guillaume Peterson St-Laurent & Shannon Hagerman & Robert Kozak, 2018. "What risks matter? Public views about assisted migration and other climate-adaptive reforestation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 573-587, December.
    13. Lim, Sungmin & Choi, Syngjoo & Hong, Jong Ho & Kim, Booyuel & Lee, Heerae & Shin, Jinwook, 2025. "Promoting willingness to pay for environmental charges in electricity tariff: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Hye Kyung Kim & Yungwook Kim, 2019. "Risk Information Seeking and Processing About Particulate Air Pollution in South Korea: The Roles of Cultural Worldview," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1071-1087, May.
    15. Agneman, Gustav & Henriks, Sofia & Bäck, Hanna & Renström, Emma, 2024. "On the nexus between material and ideological determinants of climate policy support," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Douenne, Thomas & Fabre, Adrien, 2020. "French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Erik C. Nisbet & Kathryn E. Cooper & R. Kelly Garrett, 2015. "The Partisan Brain," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 36-66, March.
    18. Anwesha Banerjee & Katharina Momsen, 2025. "(Un-)scientifically Spun: Narratives, Belief Updating, and Pro-Environmental Behavior," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(12), pages 3873-3903, December.
    19. Kovacic, Matija & Orso, Cristina Elisa, 2024. "Adverse childhood experiences and social media use in adulthood. Evidence from a novel EU survey," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1531, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Debra Javeline & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Angela Chesler, 2019. "Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 511-532, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:140232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.