IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v625y2024i7995d10.1038_s41586-023-06883-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Aslett

    (University of Central Florida)

  • Zeve Sanderson

    (New York University)

  • William Godel

    (New York University)

  • Nathaniel Persily

    (Stanford University)

  • Jonathan Nagler

    (New York University
    New York University)

  • Joshua A. Tucker

    (New York University
    New York University)

Abstract

Considerable scholarly attention has been paid to understanding belief in online misinformation1,2, with a particular focus on social networks. However, the dominant role of search engines in the information environment remains underexplored, even though the use of online search to evaluate the veracity of information is a central component of media literacy interventions3–5. Although conventional wisdom suggests that searching online when evaluating misinformation would reduce belief in it, there is little empirical evidence to evaluate this claim. Here, across five experiments, we present consistent evidence that online search to evaluate the truthfulness of false news articles actually increases the probability of believing them. To shed light on this relationship, we combine survey data with digital trace data collected using a custom browser extension. We find that the search effect is concentrated among individuals for whom search engines return lower-quality information. Our results indicate that those who search online to evaluate misinformation risk falling into data voids, or informational spaces in which there is corroborating evidence from low-quality sources. We also find consistent evidence that searching online to evaluate news increases belief in true news from low-quality sources, but inconsistent evidence that it increases belief in true news from mainstream sources. Our findings highlight the need for media literacy programmes to ground their recommendations in empirically tested strategies and for search engines to invest in solutions to the challenges identified here.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Aslett & Zeve Sanderson & William Godel & Nathaniel Persily & Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker, 2024. "Online searches to evaluate misinformation can increase its perceived veracity," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7995), pages 548-556, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:625:y:2024:i:7995:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06883-y
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06883-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:625:y:2024:i:7995:d:10.1038_s41586-023-06883-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.