IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/138706.html

Carbon dioxide removal prices and the challenge of emissions trading system integration

Author

Listed:
  • Meissner, Leonie
  • Burke, Josh
  • Taschini, Luca

Abstract

Meeting net zero emissions by 2050 will require large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) — technologies that capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it durably in the Earth’s geosphere. However, the market for durable CDR (methods that store captured carbon for centuries to millennia) is still in its early stages, with limited deployment, high costs and little public data on pricing. To address this evidence gap, the authors of this report analyse a consolidated dataset covering 43 million tonnes of contracted durable CDR across all major methods and geographies. This provides one of the first system-wide assessments of prices and contract volumes. The findings show that a rapid upscaling of CDR deployment is necessary. By the end of 2025, only 1.2% of contracted durable CDR had actually been delivered. Prices for CDR credits remain several times higher than carbon prices in the UK and EU Emissions Trading Systems (ETS) — the markets used to price emissions allowances. Crucially, expected learning rates — the cost reductions typically achieved through doubling of capacity — are very low or even negative for most methods. This suggests the existence of structural bottlenecks rather than technological maturity. As a result, durable CDR costs are unlikely to converge with ETS carbon prices in the near term and may in fact diverge further. These findings have direct implications for the UK Government’s ambition to integrate CDR into the UK ETS by 2029. Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD) — long-term government contracts that guarantee a fixed price for carbon removal — will be essential to bridge the gap between current market prices and the cost of CDR. Our estimates suggest that annual subsidy costs could reach approximately US$199 million (around £147 million) between 2028 and 2032 and increase significantly as removal targets scale up.

Suggested Citation

  • Meissner, Leonie & Burke, Josh & Taschini, Luca, 2026. "Carbon dioxide removal prices and the challenge of emissions trading system integration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138706, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138706/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    2. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Shangfeng Han & Baosheng Zhang & Xiaoyang Sun & Song Han & Mikael Höök, 2017. "China’s Energy Transition in the Power and Transport Sectors from a Substitution Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark & Serebriakova, Alexandra, 2021. "Finance in global transition scenarios: Mapping investments by technology into finance needs by source," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Maharjan, Prapti & Hauck, Mara & Kirkels, Arjan & Buettner, Benjamin & de Coninck, Heleen, 2024. "Deriving experience curves: A structured and critical approach applied to PV sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    7. Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul & Purkus, Alexandra & Söderholm, Patrik & Witte, Katherina, 2017. "Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    8. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2020. "A McKean–Vlasov approach to distributed electricity generation development," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(2), pages 269-310, April.
    9. Moon, Hee Seung & Song, Yong Hyun & Lee, Ji Woo & Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Kim, Seung Wan, 2024. "Implementation cost of net zero electricity system: Analysis based on Korean national target," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Bello, S. & Reiner, 2024. "Experience Curves for Electrolysis Technologies," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2476, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    11. Campiglio, Emanuele & Spiganti, Alessandro & Wiskich, Anthony, 2024. "Clean innovation, heterogeneous financing costs, and the optimal climate policy mix," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Juárez-Luna, David & Mosiño, Alejandro, 2024. "Electricity generation portfolios in Mexico: Environmental, economic, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Vinca, Adriano & Rottoli, Marianna & Marangoni, Giacomo & Tavoni, Massimo, "undated". "The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Electricity in Attaining 1.5 and 2°C," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266285, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    14. Lavidas, George, 2019. "Energy and socio-economic benefits from the development of wave energy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1290-1300.
    15. Zhang, Yingnan & Wu, Guanqi & Zhang, Bin, 2025. "Costs and CO2 emissions of technological transformation in China's power industry: The impact of market regulation and assistive technologies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 211-222.
    16. Upstill, Garrett & Hall, Peter, 2018. "Estimating the learning rate of a technology with multiple variants: The case of carbon storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 498-505.
    17. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2019. "Carbon abatement with renewables: Evaluating wind and solar subsidies in Germany and Spain," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 172-202.
    18. Emanuele Campiglio & Alessandro Spiganti & Anthony Wiskich, 2023. "Clean innovation and heterogeneous financing costs," Working Papers 2023: 07, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    19. Chen, Huadong & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Jianhui, 2018. "Simulating the impact of investment preference on low-carbon transition in power sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 440-455.
    20. Jin, Ding & Thube, Sneha Dattatraya & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian & Delzeit, Ruth, 2019. "A Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models: An Application for DART," Conference papers 333057, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General
    • N0 - Economic History - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.