IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/137561.html

Popular pressure, mock compliance or leadership as distraction: the UK’s approach to beneficial ownership transparency

Author

Listed:
  • Gronwald, Victoria

Abstract

Since the 2008 financial crisis, the United Kingdom (UK) has positioned itself as a global leader in beneficial ownership transparency, pioneering public registers of UK companies and of overseas companies that own real estate. This paper asks what is behind the UK’s leadership approach, in particular as it seems like a risk to its powerful wealth management center. Based on an analysis of consultation submissions and semi-structured interviews, the paper finds that the UK’s leadership occurred in a context of significant popular pressure and salience, which however cannot alone explain the leadership approach. Demonstrating that mock compliance does not fit the case either, this paper puts forward the concept of ‘leadership as distraction’. It describes when a country steers certain reforms to distract from other – more undesirable – ones, using the reputational benefits of leadership to shield other areas from reform. Understanding the dynamics of leadership as distraction opens up a different perspective on how governments reconcile pressures to abide by international standards with protecting important economic sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gronwald, Victoria, 2026. "Popular pressure, mock compliance or leadership as distraction: the UK’s approach to beneficial ownership transparency," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 137561, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/137561/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Culpepper Pepper D., 2015. "Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 391-409, October.
    2. Kevin Young, 2013. "Financial industry groups' adaptation to the post‐crisis regulatory environment: Changing approaches to the policy cycle," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(4), pages 460-480, December.
    3. Culpepper, Pepper D., 2015. "Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 391-409, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pritish Behuria, 2019. "The comparative political economy of plastic bag bans in East Africa: why implementation has varied in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 372019, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    2. Luca Menicacci & Lorenzo Simoni, 2024. "Negative media coverage of ESG issues and corporate tax avoidance," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 1-33, February.
    3. Egerod, Benjamin C. K. & Libgober, Brian & Thieme, Sebastian, 2026. "Who governs the business association?," Working Papers 382, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    4. Michel Goyer & Miguel Glatzer & Rocio Valdivielso del Real, 2022. "The management of the Eurozone in crisis times: Actors, institutions and the case of bailout packages," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(1), pages 7-25, March.
    5. Cooiman, Franziska, 2022. "Imprinting the economy: The structural power of venture capital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-1.
    6. Duvanova Dinissa & Sokhey Sarah Wilson, 2016. "Choosing which firms to help in crisis: evidence from the emerging European economies," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(3), pages 225-262, October.
    7. Hanna Schwander & Jonas Fischer, 2025. "From a cultural to a distributive issue: Public climate action as a new field for comparative political economy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 303-328, April.
    8. Friel, Sharon & Townsend, Belinda & Fisher, Matthew & Harris, Patrick & Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Power and the people's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    9. repec:ehl:lserod:104232 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vastenaekels, Julien, 2026. "Degrowth futures as power struggles: Scenarios of accumulation, sabotage, and resistance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    11. Braun, Benjamin, 2021. "From exit to control: The structural power of finance under asset manager capitalism," SocArXiv 4uesc, Center for Open Science.
    12. repec:osf:socarx:4uesc_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Downie, Christian, 2017. "Business actors, political resistance, and strategies for policymakers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 583-592.
    14. Dargent, Eduardo & Olivera, Skarlet, 2026. "The order behind disorder: informality, power, and the resilience of a transport policy trap in Lima, Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    15. Cornel Ban & Dorothee Bohle & Marek Naczyk, 2022. "A perfect storm: COVID-19 and the reorganisation of the German meat industry," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(1), pages 101-118, February.
    16. Niamh Hardiman & Saliha Metinsoy, 2017. "How do ideas shape national preferences? The Financial Transaction Tax in Ireland," Working Papers 201710, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    17. Jimena Valdez, 2023. "The politics of Uber: Infrastructural power in the United States and Europe," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 177-194, January.
    18. Dünhaupt, Petra & Herr, Hansjörg & Martin, Anne & Teipen, Christina, 2026. "Explaining uneven development trajectories in contemporary capitalism: Towards an interconnected framework of comparative political economy," IPE Working Papers 279/2026, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    19. Schmitz, Luuk, 2026. "Hierarchies of Adaptation: Corporate Power in Economic Statecraft," SocArXiv gwuce_v1, Center for Open Science.
    20. Sjorre Couvreur & Jaša Veselinovič, 2026. "An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 431-448, January.
    21. Franziska Cooiman, 2024. "Imprinting the economy: The structural power of venture capital," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(2), pages 586-602, March.
    22. Armin Mertens & Christine Trampusch & Florian Fastenrath & Rebecca Wangemann, 2021. "The political economy of local government financialization and the role of policy diffusion," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 370-387, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:137561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.