IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/128623.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative pension reform pathways in Latin America and Southern Europe: a tale of successes, failures, and future challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Angelaki, Marina
  • Carrera, Leandro Nicolas

Abstract

Latin American and South European countries share a common policy legacy of public Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) pension systems, yet reform paths taken over the past decades between and within the two regions have varied. Latin American countries opted for the full or partial privatization of their public pension systems, yet subsequent reforms have challenged the public–private mix. Meanwhile, countries in Southern Europe opted for a less radical path, entailing different degrees of reform of their public pillars and the introduction of supplementary private ones. Our analysis focuses on Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay – in Latin America – and Spain, Italy, and Greece – in Southern Europe – and the reforms implemented since 1990. In understanding reform variation, we argue that by focusing on the role of political institutions and policy legacies, it is possible to identify reform mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelaki, Marina & Carrera, Leandro Nicolas, 2025. "Comparative pension reform pathways in Latin America and Southern Europe: a tale of successes, failures, and future challenges," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128623, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:128623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/128623/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrera, Leandro & Angelaki, Marina, 2021. "Bringing back the state: understanding varieties of pension re-reforms in Latin America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112478, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Weaver, Kent, 2010. "Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders?: Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 137-162, August.
    3. Manos Matsaganis, 2007. "Union Structures and Pension Outcomes in Greece," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 537-555, September.
    4. Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (ed.), 2011. "The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199586028.
    5. Mitchell A. Orenstein, 2011. "Pension privatization in crisis: Death or rebirth of a global policy trend?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 65-80, July.
    6. Therese Jefferson, 2009. "Women and Retirement Pensions: A Research Review," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 115-145.
    7. Hacker, Jacob S., 2004. "Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 243-260, May.
    8. Carrera, Leandro & Angelaki, Marina, 2024. "Pension reform policy in Latin America: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123032, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. King, Gary & Keohane, Robert O. & Verba, Sidney, 1995. "The Importance of Research Design in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 89(2), pages 475-481, June.
    10. David Natali & Furio Stamati, 2014. "Reassessing South European Pensions after the Crisis: Evidence from Two Decades of Reforms," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 309-330, July.
    11. Carrera, Leandro & Angelaki, Marina, 2022. "The politics of pension policy responses to COVID-19: comparative insights from Chile, Bolivia and Peru," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116666, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Carrera, Leandro N. & Marina, Angelaki & Carolo, Daniel Fernando da Soledade, 2010. "Political competition and societal veto players: the politics of pension reform in Southern Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27156, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Teresa Medeiros Garcia & André Fernando Rodrigues Rocha da Silva, 2023. "Pension expenditure determinants: the case of Portugal," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 47(2), pages 177-203.
    2. Axel West Pedersen & Jon M Hippe & Anne Skevik Grødem & Ole Beier Sørensen, 2018. "Trade unions and the politics of occupational pensions in Denmark and Norway," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 109-122, February.
    3. Pierson, Paul, 2011. "The welfare state over the very long run," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2011, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    4. Carrera, Leandro & Angelaki, Marina, 2021. "Bringing back the state: understanding varieties of pension re-reforms in Latin America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112478, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Gordana Matković & Katarina Stanić, 2020. "The Serbian Pension System In Transition: A Silent Break With Bismarck," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(225), pages 105-134, April – J.
    6. Anna Veremchuk, 2020. "Gender Gap In Pension Income: Cross-Country Analysis And Role Of Gender Attitudes," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 126, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    7. Carrera, Leandro & Angelaki, Marina, 2022. "The politics of pension policy responses to COVID-19: comparative insights from Chile, Bolivia and Peru," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116666, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Igor Guardiancich & R. Kent Weaver & Gustavo Demarco & Mark C. Dorfman, 2019. "The Politics of NDC Pension Scheme Diffusion," World Bank Publications - Reports 31628, The World Bank Group.
    9. Ilana Shpaizman, 2020. "The end–means nexus and policy conversion: evidence from two cases in Israeli immigrant integration policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 713-733, December.
    10. Stefanie König, 2017. "Career histories as determinants of gendered retirement timing in the Danish and Swedish pension systems," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 397-406, December.
    11. Gore, Radhika, 2021. "Ensuring the ordinary: Politics and public service in municipal primary care in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Elliott, William & Friedline, Terri & Nam, Ilsung, 2013. "Probability of living through a period of economic instability," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 453-460.
    13. Kasper Ampe & Erik Paredis & Lotte Asveld & Patricia Osseweijer & Thomas Block, 2021. "Power struggles in policy feedback processes: incremental steps towards a circular economy within Dutch wastewater policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 579-607, September.
    14. Said Outlioua & Abdesselam Fazouane, 2023. "Which factors affect the sustainability of pension schemes?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 89-108, February.
    15. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    16. repec:ilo:ilowps:468575 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. González, Felipe, 2017. "Privatized Keynesianism or conspicuous consumption? Status anxiety and the financialization of consumption in Chile," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Rosina K Foli & Frank L K Ohemeng, 2022. "“Provide our basic needs or we go out”: the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, inequality, and social policy in Ghana [Easing of lockdown a relief to Ghana’s poor—despite fears it is premature]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 217-230.
    19. Daniel Béland & Alex Waddan, 2008. "The Politics of Social Policy Reform in the United States: The Clinton and the W. Bush Presidencies Reconsidered," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 232, McMaster University.
    20. Léna Pellandini-Simányi & Adam Banai, 2021. "Reluctant financialisaton: Financialisaton without financialised subjectivities in Hungary and the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 785-808, June.
    21. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto Stein, 2010. "Veto Players and Policy Trade-Offs- An Intertemporal Approach to Study the Effects of Political Institutions on Policy," Research Department Publications 4660, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:128623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.