IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eab/wpaper/21793.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The role of microeconomic policy reform in regional integration  analytical and empirical issues

Author

Listed:
  • Philippa Dee

    (Crawford)

Abstract

Economic integration should not be an end in itself, but the outcome of domestic reforms that increase the general contestability of markets. The paper finds that for India, comprehensive domestic regulatory reform dominates as an integration strategy, while an ASEAN+6 PTA would fail to deliver gains. Multilateral action is an intermediate strategy, important for delivering trade liberalisation in sensitive sectors and in highly protected economies. The paper then considers what institutional approaches might facilitate further domestic structural reforms. Key to this are mechanisms to review the desirability and performance of all regulations and institutions on an ongoing basis, and in a way that involves all relevant stakeholders. Such policy review institutions can provide technical solutions, helping to identify particular reform options. They can also be part of a strategy to manage the domestic political economy of reform, by providing a forum in which countervailing interests could marshal against vested interests, thus helping to build a coalition in favour of reform. Finally, they can facilitate policy coordination within and across levels of government. The paper considers desirable characteristics of such institutions, and provides examples from around the Asian region.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippa Dee, 2008. "The role of microeconomic policy reform in regional integration  analytical and empirical issues," EABER Working Papers 21793, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:eab:wpaper:21793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eaber.org/node/21793
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippa Dee, 2007. "East Asian Economic Integration and its Impact on Future Growth," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 405-423, March.
    2. Vo Tri Thanh & Nguyen Tu Anh, 2006. "Institutional Changes for Private Sector Development in Vietnam : Experience and Lessons," EABER Working Papers 21826, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    3. Gilberto Montecer Llanto, 2007. "The Policy Development Process and the Agenda for Effective Institutions : The Philippines," EABER Working Papers 21874, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    4. Philippa Dee & Kevin Hanslow, 2002. "Multilateral liberalisation of services trade," International Trade 0207002, EconWPA.
    5. Llanto, Gilberto M., 2007. "The Policy Development Process and the Agenda for Effective Institutions: The Philippines," Discussion Papers DP 2007-08, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    6. Arvind Panagariya, 1999. "The Regionalism Debate: An Overview," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 477-512, June.
    7. Pich Nitsmer, 2007. "Gridlock - Regulatory Regimes in the Thai Passenger Transport Sector," EABER Working Papers 21866, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    8. Gilberto Montecer Llanto, 2007. "The Policy Development Process and the Agenda for Effective Institutions : The Philippines," Governance Working Papers 21926, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Bernard Wonder, 2007. "Policy Determinants of Productivity Growth in Australia," EABER Working Papers 21869, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    10. Arvind Panagariya, 2000. "Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 287-331, June.
    11. Mitsuo Hosen, 2007. "Acceleration of Economic Reform in Japan and the Role of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy," EABER Working Papers 21864, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic integration; preferential trade agreements; regulatory barriers to competition; domestic regulatory reform; Asia; institutions;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eab:wpaper:21793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shiro Armstrong). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaberau.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.