IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2020-3.html

Are Homeownership Patterns Stable Enough to Tap Home Equity?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • Abigail N. Walters
  • Anek Belbase
  • Wenliang Hou

Abstract

As retirees live longer, spend more on health care, and get less income replaced by Social Security, many may need to tap their home equity to be comfortable. They could access equity most directly by selling the house where they raised their children and buying a smaller, less expensive house. Such a shift would not only produce a bundle of cash but would also reduce the expenses associated with homeownership. The problem is that most retirees are attached to their homes and want to age in place. The alternative, then, is to tap equity through a reverse mortgage or a state property tax deferral program, both of which allow people to borrow against their house and pay back the loan with interest when they move or die. However, few households choose either of these options. The question is why homeowners – who need the money, have the equity, and want to stay put – avoid borrowing against their home. In part, they may be put off by the complexity of the product or want to avoid liens on an asset that they plan to leave as a bequest. But a more fundamental concern may be the fear that, if they do decide to move, they will have to pay back the loan with interest and could be left with inadequate resources late in life. This brief, which is based on a recent paper, assesses how likely people are to move as they age to see if borrowing against one’s home is a viable financial strategy. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first section introduces the ways to tap home equity while remaining in place. The second section describes the data used for the analysis, the methodology for creating a “synthetic cohort” that can be observed from age 50 until death, and the sequence analysis technique for identifying common housing trajectories. The third section reports the results of applying sequence analysis to the synthetic cohort. Once groups with stable and unstable housing patterns have been identified, the fourth section reports on the characteristics of the homeowners who fit each pattern. The final section concludes that most homeowners experience enough residential stability to tap home equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & Abigail N. Walters & Anek Belbase & Wenliang Hou, 2020. "Are Homeownership Patterns Stable Enough to Tap Home Equity?," Issues in Brief 2020-3, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2020-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/are-homeownership-patterns-stable-enough-to-tap-home-equity-2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norman E. Hutchison & Alla Koblyakova & Bryan D. MacGregor, 2024. "Equity Release Mortgages in the UK: Regional Characteristics of Demand and Supply," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 27(4), pages 441-469.
    2. Begley, Jaclene & Chan, Sewin, 2022. "Next to kin: How children influence the residential mobility decisions of older adults," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    3. Murray, Tim & Dunn, Richard A., 2022. "Household production, home improvement, and housing investment among older Americans," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Monique Morrissey & Siavash Radpour & Barbara Schuster, 2023. "Older Workers and Retirement Security: a Review," SCEPA working paper series. 2023-01, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    5. Baulkaran, Vishaal & Jain, Pawan, 2024. "Home equity and retirement funding: Challenges and opportunities," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2020-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.