IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crg/wpaper/dt2013-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Des inégalités justes

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Herland

    () (CEREGMIA, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane)

Abstract

Les inégalités sont partout mais sont-elles ou peuvent-elles être justes ? Une première justification des inégalités se fonde sur les différences de productivité entre individus. Une autre justification fait appel aux différences entre les besoins des individus. Celle-ci, néanmoins, apparaît moins solidement fondée que la précédente. On justifie également les inégalités par leur utilité : selon la théorie de l’équilibre général, par exemple, elles sont indissociables de l’optimum. Les théoriciens contemporains de la justice sociale ne contestent d’ailleurs pas l’utilité des inégalités, que ce soit chez Rawls avec son principe de différence ou chez Sen avec la recommandation de garantir à tous des capabilités minimales. Enfin, sur la base d’une typologie des inégalités, cet article propose la vision de l’auteur sur ce que seraient des inégalités « justes ». Mots-clefs : inégalités, justice sociale, utilitarisme, Proudhon, Rawls, Sen Classification JEL : B14, D3, D63, I3, P1

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Herland, 2013. "Des inégalités justes," Documents de Travail 2013-12, CEREGMIA, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane.
  • Handle: RePEc:crg:wpaper:dt2013-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.univ-ag.fr/RePEc/DT/DT2013-12_Herland.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Amartya, 1973. "On Economic Inequality," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198281931.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B14 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist
    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • P1 - Economic Systems - - Capitalist Systems

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crg:wpaper:dt2013-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Janis Hilaricus). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ceuagmq.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.