IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chc/wpaper/0065.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Weiterentwicklung der institutionellen Ausgestaltung im Bahnmarkt

Author

Listed:
  • Urs Trinkner
  • Martin Lutzenberger

Abstract

Seit der Bahnreform 1999 werden Bahndienstleistungen von der öffentlichen Hand nach dem Gewährleistungsmodell bei den Bahnen bestellt und abgegolten. Ursprünglich ohne Regulator RailCom, aber mit einer schlanken Schiedskommission SKE zur Streitbeilegung im Bereich Netzzugang gestartet, sind die beim BAV allozierten Aufgaben umfangreich. Im vorliegenden Artikel gehen wir der Frage nach, wie die bestehende institutionelle Ausgestaltung des mit der Bahnreform eingeführten Gewährleistungsmodells weiterentwickelt werden kann. Basierend auf dem Konzept der Gewaltenteilung und der Principal-Agent Theorie leiten wir eine neue Aufgabenteilung ab, welche die Aufgaben im Bereich Versorgung/Verlagerung konsequent beim BAV verortet, während die Aufgaben im Bereich Markt bei der RailCom angesiedelt werden. Die gestärkte RailCom erlaubt es, die Trassenvergabestelle aufzulösen und deren Aufgaben den Infrastrukturbetreibern zuzuweisen. Die durch das öffentliche Eigentum anfallenden Eigeneraufgaben sehen wir konsequent bei einem anderen Departement als dem UVEK angesiedelt.

Suggested Citation

  • Urs Trinkner & Martin Lutzenberger, 2019. "Weiterentwicklung der institutionellen Ausgestaltung im Bahnmarkt," Working Papers 0065, Swiss Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:chc:wpaper:0065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.swiss-economics.ch/RePEc/files/0065TrinknerLutzenberger.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner & Topias Uotila, 2014. "Regulation and the burden of the net cost resulting from the Universal Service Obligation," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Timothy J. J. Brennan (ed.), The Role of the Postal and Delivery Sector in a Digital Age, chapter 15, pages 204-213, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2011. "A General Framework for Regulation and Liberalization in Network Industries," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. C. Jaag & U. Trinkner, 2009. "Tendering Universal Service Obligations in Liberalized Network Industries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 10(4), pages 313-333, December.
    4. Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), 2011. "International Handbook of Network Industries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12961.
    5. Matthias Finger & Urs Trinkner, 2014. "Service public in der Schweiz - Herausforderungen aus ?konomischer Sicht," Working Papers 0043, Swiss Economics.
    6. Jobst Grotrian & Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2011. "Ein koh?renter Regulierungsrahmen f?r den Schieneng?terverkehr in der Schweiz," Working Papers 0029, Swiss Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Finger & Torben Holvad, 2013. "Setting the scene: background and overview of regulatory reform in the transport sector," Chapters, in: Mattias Finger & Torben Holvad (ed.), Regulating Transport in Europe, chapter 1, pages 1-35, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Opolska, Iweta, 2017. "The efficacy of liberalization and privatization in introducing competition into European natural gas markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 12-21.
    3. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner & Jeffrey Yusof, 2014. "Assessment of EU Postal Sector Policy during the Second Barroso Administration (2010-2014)," Working Papers 0050, Swiss Economics.
    4. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    5. Christian Jaag & Martin Koller & Urs Trinkner, 2009. "Calculating the Cost of the Universal Service Obligation: The Need for a Global Approach," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Helmut M. Dietl & Urs Trinkner, 2008. "Developing Universal Postal Services in Latin America ? an Economic Perspective," Working Papers 0012, Swiss Economics, revised Nov 2008.
    7. Burger, Christoph & Weinmann, Jens, 2015. "Innovation performance of the US American and European electricity supply industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 351-359.
    8. Massaro, Maria & Pogorel, Gérard, 2015. "Next generation of radio spectrum management licensed shared access and the trade-off between static and dynamic efficiency," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146322, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Bastianin, Andrea & Castelnovo, Paolo & Florio, Massimo, 2018. "Evaluating regulatory reform of network industries: a survey of empirical models based on categorical proxies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 115-128.
    10. Joan Calzada & Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2010. "Universal service auctions in liberalized postal markets," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Paul R. Kleindorfer (ed.), Heightening Competition in the Postal and Delivery Sector, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Jaag Christian, 2011. "Entry Deterrence and the Calculation of the Net Cost of Universal Service Obligations," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Willia H Melody, 2011. "Liberalization in the Telecom Sector," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Lemstra, Wolter, 2018. "Leadership with 5G in Europe: Two contrasting images of the future, with policy and regulatory implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 587-611.
    14. Justus Haucap & Ulrich Heimeshoff, 2014. "Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: Is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 49-61, February.
    15. Sveinn Vidar Gudmundsson, 2011. "Liberalization of Air Transport," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Christian Jaag & Urs Trinkner, 2011. "A General Framework for Regulation and Liberalization in Network Industries," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. John Groenewegen, 2011. "Evolution and Design of Institutions Supporting Liberalization," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Michael A Crew & Paul R Kleindorfer, 2011. "Liberalization in the Postal and Delivery Sector," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Maarten J. Arentsen, 2011. "Trends in Gas," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Claude Ménard & Ivan Shabalov & Andrey Shastitko, 2021. "Institutions to the rescue: Untangling industrial fragmentation, institutional misalignment, and political constraints in the Russian gas pipeline industry," Post-Print hal-04012224, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bahnmarkt; Governance; institutionelle Ausgestaltung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General
    • L50 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chc:wpaper:0065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Urs Trinkner (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/swecoch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.