IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cem/doctra/820.html

Intuitive Mathematical Economics Series. General Equilibrium Models and the Gradient Field Method

Author

Listed:
  • Tomás Marinozzi
  • Leandro Nallar
  • Sergio Pernice

Abstract

General equilibrium models are typically presented with mathematical methods, such as the Edgeworth Box, that do not easily generalize to more than two goods and more than two agents. This is fine as a conceptual introduction, but it may be insufficient in the “Big-Data Machine-Learning Era”, with gigantic databases filled with data of extremely high dimensionality that are already changing the practice, and perhaps even the conceptual basis, of economics and other social sciences. In this paper present what we call the “Gradient Field Method” to solve these problems. It has the advantage of being, 1) as intuitive as the Edgeworth Box, 2) easily generalizes to far more complex situations, and 3) nicely mesh with the data friendly techniques of the new Era. In addition, it provides a unified framework to present both, partial equilibrium, and general equilibrium problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomás Marinozzi & Leandro Nallar & Sergio Pernice, 2021. "Intuitive Mathematical Economics Series. General Equilibrium Models and the Gradient Field Method," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 820, Universidad del CEMA.
  • Handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/documentos/820.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2019. "Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 685-725, August.
    2. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W., 2019. "Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know About," Research Papers 3776, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    3. Sergio A. Pernice, 2019. "Intuitive Mathematical Economics Series. Linear Structures I. Linear Manifolds, Vector Spaces and Scalar Products," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 689, Universidad del CEMA.
    4. Sergio A. Pernice, 2018. "Intuitive Mathematical Economics Series. Chain Rule and Derivatives of Functions Defined Implicitly," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 679, Universidad del CEMA.
    5. Sergio A. Pernice, 2018. "Intuitive Mathematical Economics Series. Constrained Maximization and the Method of Lagrange Multipliers," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 680, Universidad del CEMA.
    6. Sergio A. Pernice, 2020. "Serie de Machine Learning. Revisión de Algebra Lineal 1," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 736, Universidad del CEMA.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie-Charlotte Klose & Johannes Lederer, 2020. "A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics," Papers 2006.12296, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    2. Felix Chopra & Ingar Haaland, 2023. "Conducting qualitative interviews with AI," CEBI working paper series 23-06, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    3. Uguccioni, James, 2022. "The long-run effects of parental unemployment in childhood," CLEF Working Paper Series 45, Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo.
    4. Gavoille, Nicolas & Zasova, Anna, 2023. "What we pay in the shadows: Labor tax evasion, minimum wage hike and employment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Adam N. Smith & Stephan Seiler & Ishant Aggarwal, 2023. "Optimal Price Targeting," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 476-499, May.
    7. Patrick Lehnert & Michael Niederberger & Uschi Backes-Gellner & Eric Bettinger, 2020. "Proxying Economic Activity with Daytime Satellite Imagery: Filling Data Gaps Across Time and Space," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0165, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised Sep 2022.
    8. Harsh Parikh & Carlos Varjao & Louise Xu & Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2022. "Validating Causal Inference Methods," Papers 2202.04208, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    9. Labib Shami & Teddy Lazebnik, 2024. "Implementing Machine Learning Methods in Estimating the Size of the Non-observed Economy," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1459-1476, April.
    10. Liyang Tang, 2020. "Application of Nonlinear Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (NARX) neural network in macroeconomic forecasting, national goal setting and global competitiveness assessment," Papers 2005.08735, arXiv.org.
    11. repec:rim:rimwps:22-04 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Daniel Garcia & Juha Tolvanen & Alexander K. Wagner, 2022. "Demand Estimation Using Managerial Responses to Automated Price Recommendations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7918-7939, November.
    13. Vladimir Hlasny & Lidia Ceriani & Paolo Verme, 2022. "Bottom Incomes and the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 970-1006, December.
    14. Hurmeranta, Risto & Lyytikäinen, Teemu, 2025. "Nominal Loss Aversion in the Housing Market and Household Mobility," Working Papers 178, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    15. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Gobillon, Laurent & Zylberberg, Yanos, 2022. "Urban economics in a historical perspective: Recovering data with machine learning," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    16. Chen, Ruoyu & Jiang, Hanchen & Quintero, Luis E., 2023. "Measuring the value of rent stabilization and understanding its implications for racial inequality: Evidence from New York City," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Dang, Hai-Anh & Carleto, Gero & Gourlay, Sydney & Abanokova, Kseniya, 2023. "Addressing Soil Quality Data Gaps with Imputation: Evidence from Ethiopia and Uganda," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335648, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Friess, Svenja & Rosendahl Huber, Laura, 2024. "Breaking The Ice: Can Initially Active Peers Improve Platform Engagement And Persistence?," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302443, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Costola, Michele & Hinz, Oliver & Nofer, Michael & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2023. "Machine learning sentiment analysis, COVID-19 news and stock market reactions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Yoosoon Chang & Joon Y. Park & Guo Yan, 2026. "Using SVM to Estimate and Predict Binary Choice Models," Papers 2601.22659, arXiv.org.
    21. Arthur Charpentier & Romuald Elie & Carl Remlinger, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning in Economics and Finance," Papers 2003.10014, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:doctra:820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucila Solla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.