IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt0fm8k169.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability: A Case Study of San Francisco

Author

Listed:
  • Jia, Wenyu
  • Wachs, Martin

Abstract

Residential parking requirements specify the number of parking spaces that must be provided when new residential units are built. This paper examines the way such parking requirements influence housing affordability. The provision of parking spaces requires land, building materials and equipment which increase the price of housing. On the other hand, off-street parking requirements are said to be needed to prevent streets overcrowded with parked cars. In a case study of six neighborhoods in the City of San Francisco, this study investigated the influence on housing affordability of code-required parking. A hedonic model was fit to data describing housing and neighborhood characteristics in order to statistically explain the sales price of housing units that changed hands in those neighborhoods in 1996. The analysis revealed that single family houses and condominiums were more than ten percent more costly if they included off-street parking than if they did not. Based on the selling prices and the distribution of incomes of San Francisco residents, it was estimated that tens of thousands of additional households could qualify for home mortgages for units without off-street parking if those units could legally be provided under zoning and subdivision ordinances. The policy implications of this finding include the possible consideration of alternative forms of regulation regarding the provision of off-street parking in residential projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia, Wenyu & Wachs, Martin, 1998. "Parking Requirements and Housing Affordability: A Case Study of San Francisco," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0fm8k169, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt0fm8k169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0fm8k169.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "The High Cost of Free Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt25w617n7, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Shoup, Donald C., 1997. "The High Cost of Free Parking," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4vz087cc, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez, Andrés & Cordera, Rubén & Alonso, Borja & dell'Olio, Luigi & Benavente, Juan, 2022. "Microsimulation parking choice and search model to assess dynamic pricing scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 253-269.
    2. Wenjia Zhang & Ming Zhang, 2018. "Incorporating land use and pricing policies for reducing car dependence: Analytical framework and empirical evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 3012-3033, October.
    3. Deka, Devajyoti, 2012. "The impacts of non-resident parking restrictions at commuter rail stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 451-461.
    4. Jorge Andrés Perdomo Calvo & Mariana Rubio, 2012. "Regulación económica para la tarifa de parqueaderos en Bogotá mediante precios máximos," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID.
    5. Shoup, Donald C., 1999. "The trouble with minimum parking requirements," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 549-574.
    6. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Meng & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Pricing strategies for shared parking management with double auction approach: Differential price vs. uniform price," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Shaheen, Susan & Rodier, Caroline J. & Eaken, Amanda M., 2005. "Smart Parking Management Pilot Project: A Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District Parking Demonstration," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4vk680h8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Ulrika Gunnarsson-Östling, 2021. "Housing Design and Mobility Convenience—The Case of Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Allister Loder & Fabienne Cantner & Lennart Adenaw & Nico Nachtigall & David Ziegler & Felix Gotzler & Markus B. Siewert & Stefan Wurster & Sebastian Goerg & Markus Lienkamp & Klaus Bogenberger, 2023. "Germany's nationwide travel experiment in 2022: public transport for 9 Euro per month -- First findings of an empirical study," Papers 2306.08297, arXiv.org.
    10. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2024. "Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    11. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel Márquez Díaz & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Documentos de Trabajo 018327, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.
    12. Risa Hole, Arne, 2004. "Forecasting the demand for an employee Park and Ride service using commuters' stated choices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 355-362, October.
    13. Lin, Ting (Grace) & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Robinson, Todd P. & Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Church, Richard L. & Olaru, Doina & Tapin, John & Han, Renlong, 2014. "Spatial analysis of access to and accessibility surrounding train stations: a case study of accessibility for the elderly in Perth, Western Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 111-120.
    14. Jun Li & Sifan Wu & Xiaoman Feng, 2021. "Optimization of On-Street Parking Charges Based on Price Elasticity of the Expected Perceived Parking Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Watters, Paul & O'Mahony, Margaret & Caulfield, Brian, 2006. "Response to cash outs for work place parking and work place parking charges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 503-510, November.
    16. José Javier Soto Martínez & Luis Gabriel M�rquez D�az & Luis Fernando Macea Mercado, 2018. "Preferencias sobre alternativas de estacionamiento en Cartagena: ¿Cuánto están dispuestos a pagar los conductores?," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 12(2), pages 163-180.
    17. Basu, Rounaq & Ferreira, Joseph, 2021. "Sustainable mobility in auto-dominated Metro Boston: Challenges and opportunities post-COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 197-210.
    18. Keumju Lim & Justine Jihyun Kim & Jongsu Lee, 2020. "Forecasting the future scale of vehicle to grid technology for electric vehicles and its economic value as future electric energy source: The case of South Korea," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(8), pages 1350-1366, December.
    19. Balsas, Carlos J. L., 2003. "Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 35-49, January.
    20. Biruk Gebremedhin Mesfin & Zihao Li & Daniel (Jian) Sun & Deming Chen & Yueting Xi, 2024. "Urban traffic-parking system dynamics model with macroscopic properties: a comparative study between Shanghai and Zurich," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt0fm8k169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.