IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2531-d1359956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • David Kohlrautz

    (Institute of Urban and Transport Planning, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany)

  • Tobias Kuhnimhof

    (Institute of Urban and Transport Planning, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany)

Abstract

Bicycle parking requirements in building codes are an important tool for promoting cycling, as several studies have shown that the provision of secure parking increases cycling rates and contributes to sustainability. However, bicycle parking requirements are not comprehensive across the EU and vary widely within countries and between municipalities, which questions what aspects they should consider. This paper analyzes the literature and guidelines on parking requirements and compares their implementation in ten German and four international cities both qualitatively, examining specific requirements for parking facilities, and quantitatively, examining the number of spaces required. The results show that most guidelines set comparable standards in terms of quality and quantity. However, the quality standards defined in the actual building codes are heterogeneous. While most cities require features such as the ability to lock the bicycle frame, they do not adequately address different user groups and insufficiently consider e-bike charging infrastructure. Most cities meet the guidelines for the required number of bicycle parking spaces, but lack a clear rationale based on local conditions, which can lead to an unsustainable under- or oversupply. In summary, cities do not fully utilize the potential of parking requirements to promote cycling because of incomplete qualitative standards.

Suggested Citation

  • David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2024. "Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2531-:d:1359956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2023. "E-Bike Charging Infrastructure in the Workplace—Should Employers Provide It?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, July.
    2. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt25w617n7 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:cdl:uctcwp:qt4vz087cc is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Alexandros Nikitas & Stefanos Tsigdinos & Christos Karolemeas & Efthymia Kourmpa & Efthimios Bakogiannis, 2021. "Cycling in the Era of COVID-19: Lessons Learnt and Best Practice Policy Recommendations for a More Bike-Centric Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, April.
    5. Changzheng Yuan & Yangbo Sun & Jun Lv & Anne C. Lusk, 2017. "Cycle Tracks and Parking Environments in China: Learning from College Students at Peking University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandar Šobot & Sergej Gričar, 2025. "An Example of the Transition to Sustainable Mobility in the Austrian City of Graz," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shifang Liu & Shaohua Tan, 2022. "Building a New Framework for Urban Parking Facilities Research with Quality Improvement: The Case of Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Song, Jie & Zhang, Liye & Qin, Zheng & Ramli, Muhamad Azfar, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolving patterns of bike-share mobility networks and their associations with land-use conditions before and after the COVID-19 outbreak," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 592(C).
    3. Ioannis Politis & Georgios Georgiadis & Aristomenis Kopsacheilis & Anastasia Nikolaidou & Panagiotis Papaioannou, 2021. "Capturing Twitter Negativity Pre- vs. Mid-COVID-19 Pandemic: An LDA Application on London Public Transport System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Guilhem Lecouteux & Léonard Moulin, 2023. "Cycling in the Aftermath of COVID-19: An Empirical Estimation of the Social Dynamics of Bicycle Adoption in Paris," GREDEG Working Papers 2023-02, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. Kapousizis, Georgios & Sarker, Rumana & Baran Ulak, M. & Geurs, Karst, 2024. "User acceptance of smart e-bikes: What are the influential factors? A cross-country comparison of five European countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Gadsby, April & Knezevich, Ronald & Yu, Pingzhou Lucas & Tsai, Yichang James & Harvey, John, 2024. "A national survey and roadmap on complete streets infrastructure asset management policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 86-97.
    7. Shahram Heydari & Garyfallos Konstantinoudis & Abdul Wahid Behsoodi, 2021. "Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London," Papers 2107.11589, arXiv.org.
    8. Goh, Hyewon & Choi, Gahyun & Song, Yena, 2023. "How the COVID-19 pandemic changed travel behaviour? A case study on public bikes in Seoul," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Panagiotis G. Tzouras & Lambros Mitropoulos & Katerina Koliou & Eirini Stavropoulou & Christos Karolemeas & Eleni Antoniou & Antonis Karaloulis & Konstantinos Mitropoulos & Eleni I. Vlahogianni & Kons, 2023. "Describing Micro-Mobility First/Last-Mile Routing Behavior in Urban Road Networks through a Novel Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Farha, Farzana Faiza & Shanto, Farabi Sarker & Khan, Fyrooz Anika & Mehrin, Maria & Khan, Asif & Tabassum, Nawshin & Nakshi, Paromita, 2024. "Exploring the changes in travel behavior between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Dhaka," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 24-35.
    11. Bencekri, Madiha & Van Fan, Yee & Lee, Doyun & Choi, Minje & Lee, Seungjae, 2024. "Optimizing shared bike systems for economic gain: Integrating land use and retail," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Waitt, Gordon & Stanes, Elyse, 2022. "Reactivating commuter cycling: COVID-19 pandemic disruption to everyday transport choices in Sydney, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Bonsma-Fisher, Madeleine & Lin, Bo & Chan, Timothy C.Y. & Saxe, Shoshanna, 2024. "Exploring the geographical equity-efficiency tradeoff in cycling infrastructure planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Marcelo Werneck Barbosa & Paulo Renato de Sousa & Leise Kelli de Oliveira, 2022. "The Effects of Barriers and Freight Vehicle Restrictions on Logistics Costs: A Comparison before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Nazanin Zare & Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà & Tullio Giuffrè, 2024. "Blending Efficiency and Resilience in the Performance Assessment of Urban Intersections: A Novel Heuristic Informed by Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Yangkun Xia & Zhuo Fu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "A New TS Algorithm for Solving Low-Carbon Logistics Vehicle Routing Problem with Split Deliveries by Backpack—From a Green Operation Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale, 2021. "Toward Sustainability: Bike-Sharing Systems Design, Simulation and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-5, July.
    18. Seungkyu Ryu & Anthony Chen & Jacqueline Su & Xintao Liu & Jiangbo (Gabe) Yu, 2021. "Considering Space Syntax in Bicycle Traffic Assignment with One or More User Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Desmond Lartey & Meredith A. Glaser, 2024. "Towards a Sustainable Transport System: Exploring Capacity Building for Active Travel in Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Kohlrautz, David & Kuhnimhof, Tobias, 2025. "Cyclists’ heterogeneous parking preferences and their implications for bicycle parking facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2531-:d:1359956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.