IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4324-d1652711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Example of the Transition to Sustainable Mobility in the Austrian City of Graz

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandar Šobot

    (Faculty of Economics and Informatics, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

  • Sergej Gričar

    (Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Novo Mesto, Na Loko 2, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
    Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Ika 46, 51414 Opatija, Croatia)

Abstract

With its profound impact, climate change has emerged as the most significant challenge for economic development. The primary cause of this global crisis is “fossil” capitalism, which denotes the pollution caused by greenhouse gas emissions. As the main contributors, cars significantly add to this pollution, making traffic one of the largest polluters responsible for the ecological and economic crisis. At the European Union (EU) level, countries have formulated environmental policies within the framework of the Green Deal. The Green Deal recognises sustainable mobility as a promising solution for reducing greenhouse gases and managing the consequences of climate change. The research background highlights the promising effects of the sustainable mobility strategy in the Austrian city of Graz. The research methodology is based on a case study analysis of the “eco-transformation” of Graz, focusing on developing a local sustainable mobility strategy and implementing the “soft mobility” concept. Soft mobility refers to non-motorised forms of transportation, such as walking, cycling, and public transit, which are environmentally friendly and contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The research examines three key components—space, culture, and ambition—as fundamental elements of sustainable mobility. All available online data were collected through desk analysis and a literature review to assess the effectiveness of sustainable policies in Graz. In addition, a quantitative analysis using daily cyclist counts and weather data from 2022–2024 was conducted, confirming the impact of environmental and temporal variables on cycling behaviour. The findings underscore Graz’s replicable value as a sustainable mobility model and highlight the broader implications for EU climate goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandar Šobot & Sergej Gričar, 2025. "An Example of the Transition to Sustainable Mobility in the Austrian City of Graz," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4324-:d:1652711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergej Gričar & Urška Longar & Tanja Longar & Violeta Šugar, 2024. "Cycling into Sustainability: Lessons from the Netherlands for Slovenia’s E-Bike Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    3. Rietveld, Piet & Daniel, Vanessa, 2004. "Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 531-550, August.
    4. Urška Longar & Sergej Gričar & Tea Baldigara & Štefan Bojnec, 2024. "Cycling, Economic Growth, and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Slovenia and Belgium," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Heejoo Son & Jinhyeok Jang & Jihan Park & Akos Balog & Patrick Ballantyne & Heeseo Rain Kwon & Alex Singleton & Jinuk Hwang, 2025. "Leveraging Advanced Technologies for (Smart) Transportation Planning: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-35, March.
    6. Lucas, Karen, 2012. "Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 105-113.
    7. Matija Kovačić & Maja Mutavdžija & Krešimir Buntak, 2022. "New Paradigm of Sustainable Urban Mobility: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Anatoli Rontogianni & Myrto Zeneli & Panagiotis Grammelis & Olgu Birgi & Rainer Janssen & Benedetta Di Costanzo & Martijn Vis & Bas Davidis & Patrick Reumerman & Asier, 2024. "Charting the Course: Navigating Decarbonisation Pathways in Greece, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain’s Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Federica Biassoni & Chiara Lo Carmine & Paolo Perego & Martina Gnerre, 2023. "Choosing the Bicycle as a Mode of Transportation, the Influence of Infrastructure Perception, Travel Satisfaction and Pro-Environmental Attitude, the Case of Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Aikaterina Oikonomou & Michael Polemis & Symeoni-Eleni Soursou, 2021. "International Environmental Agreements and CO 2 Emissions: Fresh Evidence from 11 Polluting Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Aleksandar Šobot & Sergej Gričar & Violeta Šugar & Štefan Bojnec, 2024. "Sustainable Cycling: Boosting Commuting and Tourism Opportunities in Istria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Md Arifuzzaman & Shohel Amin, 2025. "Automated Vehicles: Are Cities Ready to Adopt AVs as the Sustainable Transport Solution?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Francesco Tripaldi & Stefano Vianello & Nicola Bianchi, 2025. "Emerging Trends in Urban Air Mobility: An Extensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-29, March.
    15. Aleksandra Gulc & Klaudia Budna, 2024. "Classification of Smart and Sustainable Urban Mobility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, April.
    16. David Kohlrautz & Tobias Kuhnimhof, 2024. "Bicycle Parking Requirements in City Building Codes and Their Potential to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Faissal Jelti & Amine Allouhi & Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul, 2023. "Transition Paths towards a Sustainable Transportation System: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Anna Rutka & Maciej Michnej & Tomasz Zwoliński & Maciej Gabory, 2024. "Core Indicators for Monitoring the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Remme, Devyn & Sareen, Siddharth & Haarstad, Håvard, 2022. "Who benefits from sustainable mobility transitions? Social inclusion, populist resistance and elite capture in Bergen, Norway," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Ioannis Kanakis & Stathis Arapostathis & Stelios Rozakis, 2025. "Technology, Behavior, and Governance: Far Away, Yet So Close! A Comprehensive Review of the Sustainable Mobility and Transportation Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-44, May.
    3. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Combs, Tabitha S., 2017. "Examining changes in travel patterns among lower wealth households after BRT investment in Bogotá, Colombia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 11-20.
    6. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. José Renato Barandier & Milena Bodmer & Izabella Lentino, 2017. "Evidence of the impacts of the national housing programme on the accessibility of the low‐income population in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 105-118, May.
    8. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Cohen, Tom, 2020. "Tools for addressing transport inequality: A novel variant of accessibility measurement," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Diana Angarita-Lozano & Darío Hidalgo-Guerrero & Sonia Díaz-Márquez & María Morales-Puentes & Miguel Angel Mendoza-Moreno, 2025. "Multidimensional Evaluation Model for Sustainable and Smart Urban Mobility in Global South Cities: A Citizen-Centred Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Paweł Pistelok & Daniel Štraub, 2021. "Evaluation of the Road Policy in the Light of Vision Zero in Jaworzno, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Luis A. Guzman & Victor A. Cantillo-Garcia & Julian Arellana & Olga L. Sarmiento, 2023. "User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 751-771, June.
    13. Lopes, Miguel & Mélice Dias, Ana & Silva, Cecília, 2021. "The impact of urban features in cycling potential – A tale of Portuguese cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Anders Larsson & Jerry Olsson, 2017. "Potentials and limitations for the use of accessibility measures for national transport policy goals in freight transport and logistics: evidence from Västra Götaland County, Sweden," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 4, pages 71-92.
    15. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    16. Xiaoshu Cao & Huiling Chen & Feiwen Liang & Wulin Wang, 2018. "Measurement and Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of Transit Equity: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Carneiro, Mariana S. & Falavigna, Claudio & Luz, Gregório & Orrico, Romulo, 2021. "Balancing time: Using a new accessibility measure in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Oscar Sosa López, 2021. "BICYCLE POLICY IN MEXICO CITY: Urban Experiments and Differentiated Citizenship," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 477-497, May.
    19. Yang, Wenyue & Chen, Bi Yu & Cao, Xiaoshu & Li, Tao & Li, Peng, 2017. "The spatial characteristics and influencing factors of modal accessibility gaps: A case study for Guangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 21-32.
    20. Taeihagh, Araz & Bañares-Alcántara, René & Givoni, Moshe, 2014. "A virtual environment for the formulation of policy packages," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 53-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4324-:d:1652711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.