IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2662.html

The Significance of the Texas CREZ Process for Transmission Planning Today

Author

Listed:
  • Littlechild, S.
  • Baldick, R.

Abstract

The Texas Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) process remains highly relevant to current transmission planning. Its significance lies not in providing a template to be copied mechanically, but in showing how a regulator can address a transmission "chicken and egg" problem that ordinary incremental planning is poorly equipped to solve. Senate Bill 20 of 2005 required the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to designate renewable zones and develop transmission to deliver their output "in a manner that is most beneficial and cost-effective to the customers." In 2008 the Commission approved a transmission plan capable of supporting about 18,500 MW of wind generation, and by early 2014 nearly 3,600 miles of new transmission had been built. The process may be understood as a hybrid institutional mechanism combining legislative mandate, regulatory planning and backstop, and negotiated implementation in provider selection and siting. The CREZ experience also illustrates the limits of anticipatory transmission planning: it relied on only partial ex ante cost -benefit discipline, imposed local burdens that were not always fully compensated, and used a competitive designation model that Texas later curtailed. Current transmission policy could recover the logic of CREZ, but improve the instruments: by using more explicit benefit tests, transparent cost allocation, better treatment of local burdens, safeguards against incumbent control, and deliberate use of negotiated-settlement techniques under a regulatory backstop.

Suggested Citation

  • Littlechild, S. & Baldick, R., 2026. "The Significance of the Texas CREZ Process for Transmission Planning Today," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2662, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication-cwpe-pdfs/cwpe2662.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. LaRiviere, Jacob & Lyu, Xueying, 2022. "Transmission constraints, intermittent renewables and welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Paul Simshauser & Farhad Billimoria & Craig Rogers, 2021. "Optimising VRE plant capacity in Renewable Energy Zones," Working Papers EPRG2121, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Simshauser, Paul, 2021. "Renewable Energy Zones in Australia's National Electricity Market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Doucet, Joseph & Littlechild, Stephen, 2006. "Negotiated settlements: The development of legal and economic thinking," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 266-277, December.
    5. Harleman, Max, 2024. "Who bears the cost of renewable power transmission lines? Evidence from housing values," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Dorsey-Palmateer, Reid, 2020. "Transmission costs and the value of wind generation for the CREZ project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Doucet, J. & Littlechild, S., 2006. "Negotiated Settlements: The development of economic and legal thinking," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0622, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. Heesun Jang, 2020. "Market Impacts of a Transmission Investment: Evidence from the ERCOT Competitive Renewable Energy Zones Project," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Doucet, Joseph & Littlechild, Stephen, 2009. "Negotiated settlements and the National Energy Board in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4633-4644, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Littlechild & Ross Baldick, 2026. "The significance of the Texas CREZ process for transmission planning today," Working Papers EPRG2616, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    2. Simshauser, P. & Shellshear, E., 2026. "Renewable Energy Zones: Generator Cost Allocation Under Uncertainty," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2524, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Stephen Littlechild, 2011. "Regulation, customer protection and customer engagement," Working Papers EPRG 1119, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    4. Bruce Mountain, 2026. "Bargaining under monopoly: negotiated settlement, customer bargaining and Australian energy networks," Working Papers EPRG2615, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    5. Littlechild, Stephen, 2009. "The bird in hand: Stipulated settlements in the Florida electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3-4), pages 276-287, September.
    6. Littlechild, Stephen, 2018. "Economic regulation of privatised airports: Some lessons from UK experience," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 100-114.
    7. Biggar, Darryl, 2022. "Seven outstanding issues in energy network regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Littlechild, Stephen, 2018. "Regulation and the nature of competition," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 211-223.
    9. Littlechild, Stephen, 2012. "The process of negotiating settlements at FERC," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 174-191.
    10. Chakravorty, Shourjo, 2015. "A study of the negotiated-settlement practice in regulation: Some evidence from Florida," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 12-18.
    11. McDonald, Paul, 2023. "Locational and market value of Renewable Energy Zones in Queensland," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 198-213.
    12. Andrzej T. Szablewski, 2018. "Kolejny etap ewolucji koncepcji i praktyki regulacji ekonomicznej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 49-72.
    13. McDonald, Paul, 2024. "Interrelationships of renewable energy zones in Queensland: localised effects on capacity value and congestion," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 818-833.
    14. Paul Simshauser & Evan Shellshear, 2025. "Renewable Energy Zones: generator cost allocation under uncertainty [Revised version]," Working Papers EPRG2506, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    15. Littlechild, Stephen C. & Ponzano, Eduardo A., 2008. "Transmission expansion in Argentina 5: The regional electricity forum of Buenos Aires province," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1491-1526, July.
    16. Mountain, B., 2026. "Open configuration options Bargaining under Monopoly: Negotiated Settlement, Customer Bargaining and Australian Energy Networks," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2661, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Heims, Eva M. & Lodge, Martin, 2018. "Customer engagement in UK water regulation: towards a collaborative regulatory state?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87258, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Eskesen, Anita, 2021. "A contract design perspective on balancing the goals of utility regulation," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Bordignon, Stephen & Littlechild, Stephen, 2012. "The Hunter Valley access undertaking: Elements of a negotiated settlement," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 179-187.
    20. repec:aen:eeepjl:1_1_06 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Stephen Littlechild, 2016. "Contrasting Developments in UK Energy Regulation: Retail Policy and Consumer Engagement," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 118-132, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.