IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bhw/wpaper/08-2025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business-as-Usual and Orbital Debris Path

Author

Listed:
  • Aneli Bongers

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

  • Jose L. Torres

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

Abstract

Computing the so-called Business-as-Usual (BaU) scenario in Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) that include environmental externalities is a non-trivial task. Traditionally, general equilibrium growth models with such externalities are solved in a centralized framework, where a social planner maximizes welfare by fully internalizing the environmental damage. This is the approach taken in the well-known DICE model by Nordhaus (1992). However, in DICE, the BaU scenario is defined as the social planner solution with zero abatement, even though the externality is already internalized through investment decisions to maximize social welfare. This creates a mismatch when comparing the BaU scenario to the true first-best allocation. This paper solves the DISE-2024 (Dynamic Integrated Space Economy) model in a decentralized economy, using a fixed point method to compute orbital debris trajectories under a laissez-faire setting, and compares them with the first-best optimal trajectories from a centralized economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneli Bongers & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Business-as-Usual and Orbital Debris Path," Space Economics Working Papers 08-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised Sep 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:08-2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spaceeconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SEWP-08-2025.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:08-2025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose L. Torres (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/females.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.