IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bhw/wpaper/08-2025.html

Business-as-Usual and Orbital Debris Path

Author

Listed:
  • Aneli Bongers

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

  • Jose L. Torres

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

Abstract

Computing the so-called Business-as-Usual (BaU) scenario in Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) that include environmental externalities is a non-trivial task. Traditionally, general equilibrium growth models with such externalities are solved in a centralized framework, where a social planner maximizes welfare by fully internalizing the environmental damage. This is the approach taken in the well-known DICE model by Nordhaus (1992). However, in DICE, the BaU scenario is defined as the social planner solution with zero abatement, even though the externality is already internalized through investment decisions to maximize social welfare. This creates a mismatch when comparing the BaU scenario to the true first-best allocation. This paper solves the DISE-2024 (Dynamic Integrated Space Economy) model in a decentralized economy, using a fixed point method to compute orbital debris trajectories under a laissez-faire setting, and compares them with the first-best optimal trajectories from a centralized economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneli Bongers & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Business-as-Usual and Orbital Debris Path," Space Economics Working Papers 08-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised Sep 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:08-2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spaceeconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/SEWP-08-2025.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin L. Weitzman, 2007. "A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 703-724, September.
    2. Bongers, Anelí & Torres, José L., 2023. "Orbital debris and the market for satellites," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Robert C. Feenstra & Robert Inklaar & Marcel P. Timmer, 2015. "The Next Generation of the Penn World Table," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(10), pages 3150-3182, October.
    4. Julien Guyot & Sébastien Rouillon, 2024. "Sustainable management of space activity in low Earth orbit," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 188-212, April.
    5. Akhil Rao & Giacomo Rondina, 2025. "The Economics of Orbit Use: Open Access, External Costs, and Runaway Debris Growth," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(2), pages 353-388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneli Bongers & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "On the Social Cost of Orbital Debris," Space Economics Working Papers 04-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised Mar 2025.
    2. Traeger, Christian, 2021. "ACE - Analytic Climate Economy," CEPR Discussion Papers 15968, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Christian P. Traeger, 2023. "ACE—Analytic Climate Economy," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 372-406, August.
    4. Aneli Bongers & Benedetto Molinari & Sebastien Rouillon & Jose L. Torres, 2024. "The foundations of the economics of the outer space: A premier overview," Space Economics Working Papers 01-2024, Institute for Space Economics, revised Aug 2024.
    5. Sébastien Rouillon, 2025. "Monopolistic Competition in a Limited Orbital Space," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(4), pages 1009-1038, April.
    6. Anelí Bongers & César Ortiz & José L. Torres, 2025. "DISE: A Dynamic Integrated Space-Economy Model for Orbital Debris Mitigation Policy Evaluation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(8), pages 2125-2156, August.
    7. Stéphane Hallegatte, 2008. "A Proposal for a New Prescriptive Discounting Scheme: The Intergenerational Discount Rate," Working Papers 2008.47, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. Lisandra Flach & Fabian Gräf, 2020. "The impact of trade agreements on world export prices," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 168-208, February.
    9. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    10. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo, 2014. "The social rate of discount, climate change and real options," CEIS Research Paper 309, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 18 Feb 2014.
    11. Mkandawire, Petros, 2023. "Do environmental provisions in preferential trade agreements affect climate protection performance?," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365880, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    12. António Afonso & José Alves & Krzysztof Beck, 2022. "Pay and unemployment determinants of migration flows in the European Union," Working Papers REM 2022/0251, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    13. Niclas Berggren & Christian Bjørnskov, 2023. "Does legal freedom satisfy?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Dietzenbacher, Erik & Yan, Bingqian, 2024. "Explaining the direction of emissions embodied in trade from hypotheses based on country rankings11Funding information: Bingqian Yan received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 71903195," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Nadir Altinok & Claude Diebolt, 2024. "Cliometrics of learning-adjusted years of schooling: evidence from a new dataset," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 18(3), pages 691-764, September.
    16. Nisamudheen, P.P. & Shareef, K. Hassan, 2025. "The role of human capital in driving renewable energy and sustainable development in India," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. José Luis Cendejas & Félix-Fernando Muñoz & Nadia Fernández-de-Pinedo, 2017. "A contribution to the analysis of historical economic fluctuations (1870–2010): filtering, spurious cycles, and unobserved component modeling," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 11(1), pages 93-125, January.
    18. Muhammad Shafiullah & Ravinthirakumaran Navaratnam, 2016. "Do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka Enjoy Export-Led Growth? A Comparison of Two Small South Asian Economies," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(1), pages 114-132, March.
    19. Frederick Ploeg & Aart Zeeuw, 2019. "Pricing Carbon and Adjusting Capital to Fend Off Climate Catastrophes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 29-50, January.
    20. Bilgili, Faik & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2015. "Biomass energy and economic growth nexus in G7 countries: Evidence from dynamic panel data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 132-138.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:08-2025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose L. Torres (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/females.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.