IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en13727.html

Gender inequalities in the platform economy: The cases of delivery and private passenger transport services in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia POGGI
  • Ariela MICHA
  • Francisca PEREYRA

Abstract

This article inspects how the expansion of the platform economy affects gender inequalities, in some new forms as well in reinforcing pre-existing ones. It focuses on two platform occupations in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area: ride-hailing and delivery services. First, it explores the ways in which the platform economy constitutes a welcoming environment for female workers. Second, female versus male performance is assessed in terms of hours worked and earnings. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches it performs a gender gap analysis via linear regression. The article finds that platforms are facilitating an increase in female participation due to three main factors: the impossibility of finding another job, the impersonal recruiting mechanisms and time flexibility offered by platforms. This trend still implies significant gender gaps. The analysis suggests that the differentiated economic performance of male and female riders and drivers is mainly associated to on-the-job characteristics that are reinforced by algorithmic bias in the platform. Women experience more restrictions in terms of when and where they can work, as location and time choices are both constrained by care responsibilities and are also due to the subjective perception of exposure to insecurity and harassment during the work shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia POGGI & Ariela MICHA & Francisca PEREYRA, 2022. "Gender inequalities in the platform economy: The cases of delivery and private passenger transport services in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area," Working Paper 438e22d3-239e-468a-b317-b, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en13727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2022-03-08-08-59/Gender-inequalities-in-the-platform-economy-Argentina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Bin Gu & Jing Peng, 2018. "Gender Wage Gap in Online Gig Economy and Gender Differences in Job Preferences," Working Papers 18-03, NET Institute.
    2. Berg, Janine., 2016. "Income security in the on-demand economy : findings and policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers," ILO Working Papers 994906483402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Sacha Garben, 2019. "The regulatory challenge of occupational safety and health in the online platform economy," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(3), pages 95-112, July.
    4. Sonia Filipetto & Ariela Micha & Francisca Pereyra & Cecilia Poggi & Martín Trombetta, 2022. "Labour Transitions that Lead to Platform Work: Towards Increased Formality? Evidence from Argentina," Working Papers 154, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    5. Fudge, Judy. & Hobden, Claire., 2018. "Conceptualizing the role of intermediaries in formalizing domestic work," ILO Working Papers 994989393002676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Francisca PEREYRA & Lorena POBLETE, 2022. "Regulating platform delivery work in Argentina. Tensions between regulations and the priorities of workers," Working Paper 6da09b21-a8c7-41ac-83c7-6, Agence française de développement.
    7. M. Keith Chen & Judith A. Chevalier & Peter E. Rossi & Emily Oehlsen, 2019. "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2735-2794.
    8. repec:avg:wpaper:fr13696 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Francisca PEREYRA & Lorena POBLETE, 2022. "Regulating platform delivery work in Argentina. Tensions between regulations and the priorities of workers," Working Paper effab95e-390b-4f82-94f3-c, Agence française de développement.
    10. Cody Cook & Rebecca Diamond & Jonathan V Hall & John A List & Paul Oyer, 2021. "The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2210-2238.
    11. Weber, Enzo., 2018. "Setting out for Digital Social Security," ILO Working Papers 995008793202676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia POGGI & Sonia FILIPETTO & Ariela MICHA & Francisca PEREYRA & Martín TROMBETTA, 2022. "Labour transitions that lead to platform work: Towards increased formality? Evidence from Argentina," Working Paper faa6161e-8fc7-4564-9732-0, Agence française de développement.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Rosaia, 2025. "Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(6), pages 2235-2271, November.
    2. Yuan, Gecheng & Lu, Weijie & Wu, Xinyi & Zhou, Li, 2025. "The gig economy and household financial vulnerability," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    3. Tarduno, Matthew, 2025. "Elasticities and tax incidence in urban ridesharing markets: Evidence from Chicago," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Hayato Kanayama & Suguru Otani, 2024. "Nonparametric Estimation of Matching Efficiency and Elasticity in a Spot Gig Work Platform: 2019-2023," Papers 2412.19024, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    5. David P. Baron, 2018. "Disruptive Entrepreneurship and Dual Purpose Strategies: The Case of Uber," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 439-462, June.
    6. Peter Blair & Benjamin Posmanick, 2023. "Why Did Gender Wage Convergence in the United States Stall?," Working Papers 2023-001, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    7. Yongwook Paik & Christos A. Makridis, 2023. "The social value of a ridesharing platform: a hedonic pricing approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2125-2150, May.
    8. Oliver Alexander & Jeff Borland & Andrew Charlton & Amit Singh, 2022. "The Labour Market for Uber Drivers in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 177-194, June.
    9. Xinyu Cao & Dennis Zhang & Lei Huang, 2022. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Behavior of Online Gig Workers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 2611-2628, September.
    10. Gomez-Herrera, Estrella & Mueller-Langer, Frank, 2024. "Does information disclosure affect the gender gap in bidding behavior? Empirical evidence from a natural experiment on a large online labor platform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2020. "Unemployment and Worker Participation in the Gig Economy: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 431-448, June.
    12. Bernardo Fanfani & Filippo Passerini, 2024. "Do Alternative Work Arrangements Substitute Standard Employment? Evidence from Worker-Level Data," Working Papers wp1190, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    13. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano & Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario, 2019. "Quantity and quality of work in the platform economy," GLO Discussion Paper Series 420, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Susan Athey & Juan Camilo Castillo & Bharat Chandar, 2026. "Service Quality on Online Platforms: Empirical Evidence About Driving Quality at Uber," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 4398-4418, May.
    15. Henao, Alejandro & Marshall, Wesley E., 2019. "An analysis of the individual economics of ride-hailing drivers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 440-451.
    16. Ngoc Dao & Riley Wilson, 2026. "Alternative Insurance: Gig Work and Social Insurance Participation," CESifo Working Paper Series 12897, CESifo.
    17. Hongyao Ma & Fei Fang & David C. Parkes, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pricing for Ridesharing Platforms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1025-1041, March.
    18. Barrios, John M. & Hochberg, Yael V. & Yi, Hanyi, 2018. "The Cost of Convenience: Ridesharing and Traffic Fatalities," Working Papers 282, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    19. Borchert, Kathrin & Hirth, Matthias & Kummer, Michael E. & Laitenberger, Ulrich & Slivko, Olga & Viete, Steffen, 2018. "Unemployment and online labor," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-023, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Susan Athey & Michael Luca, 2019. "Economists (and Economics) in Tech Companies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 209-230, Winter.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en13727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.