IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2013_173.html

Measurement of Land Fragmentation in the Course of Building Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Chin Lin
  • Fang-Hsin Huang

Abstract

Fragmented land ownership is widely believed to be responsible for the difficulties in assembling the contiguous land parcels for a more dense development. In order to acquire a large number of small land parcels, an often excessively-high price needs to be paid, if and only if all the owners finally agree to the price. Even if all parcels are assembled, the soaring land price is to a large extent responsible for a high housing price. It has been therefore in many studies concluded that the fragmentation of land ownership tends to lead to an inert supply of land, and given a strong demand, will subsequently contribute to an elevated housing price.The above arguments seem to fit well into the scenario of Taipei City. Taipei is the capital and largest city in Taiwan, with a density of 9,593 inhabitants per km2 and a growing, though steadily, number of households. In addition, the housing price in Taipei has been overvalued by 38% and 27% compared to the fundamental prices derived from price/income and price/rent relationship, respectively. In order to accommodate the expanding demand for housing, fragmented land has to be assembled to pave way for the later development. In other words, developers will constantly purchase and consolidate small parcels into a larger one in a single ownership prior to the construction of new houses. Despite the theoretical and practical significance, little research has looked into the measurement of land fragmentation and the changes in the degree of fragmentation in the course of building activities. Understanding of land fragmentation is crucial for a comprehension of how land is priced, and how land is assembled and developed. This study examines in-depth the area of Wan-Hwa train station where was developed earliest in Taipei. We analyse the changes in land titles of every single parcel from 1970s through 1990s that cover at least two property cycles. Developers over the course of two property cycles must have engaged in land assembly for their building projects. Borrowed from other research fields such as agricultural productivity and income inequity, we apply Gini Coefficient, Simpson Index and Januszewski Index respectively to measure the distribution of land titles (shares) in this area over time. We will also examine the changes in the degree of land fragmentation within the context of property cycles. It is hoped that through observation of changes in the distribution of ownership on land, how land is assembled and buildings supplied in a city where housing affordability is a daunting problem can be better understood.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Chin Lin & Fang-Hsin Huang, 2013. "Measurement of Land Fragmentation in the Course of Building Activities," ERES eres2013_173, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2013_173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2013-173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2013_173.content.01584.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glaeser, Edward L. & Ward, Bryce A., 2009. "The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 265-278, May.
    2. Colwell, Peter F. & Munneke, Henry J., 1997. "The Structure of Urban Land Prices," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 321-336, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Shibo & Zhang, Yaxin & Jin, Gui, 2025. "Can urban low-carbon transformation affect the prices of its industrial land? An empirical study based on spatial regression discontinuity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Bratu, Cristina & Harjunen, Oskari & Saarimaa, Tuukka, 2023. "JUE Insight: City-wide effects of new housing supply: Evidence from moving chains," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Xing Su & Zhu Qian, 2020. "State Intervention in Land Supply and Its Impact on Real Estate Investment in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Matthias Wrede, 2022. "Voting on urban land development," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 335-359, March.
    5. Manfred M. Fischer & Florian Huber & Michael Pfarrhofer & Petra Staufer‐Steinnocher, 2021. "The Dynamic Impact of Monetary Policy on Regional Housing Prices in the United States," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1039-1068, December.
    6. Elliot Anenberg & Edward Kung, 2018. "Can More Housing Supply Solve the Affordability Crisis? Evidence from a Neighborhood Choice Model," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-035, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    7. Edward L. Glaeser, 2013. "The Supply of Environmentalism," NBER Working Papers 19359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Shi, Yining, 2022. "Financial liberalization and house prices: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2020. "Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 223-248, February.
    10. Gyourko, Joseph & Hartley, Jonathan S. & Krimmel, Jacob, 2021. "The local residential land use regulatory environment across U.S. housing markets: Evidence from a new Wharton index," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Geerte Cotteleer & Tracy Stobbe & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2011. "Bayesian Model Averaging In The Context Of Spatial Hedonic Pricing: An Application To Farmland Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 540-557, August.
    12. Ritashree Chakrabarti & Junfu Zhang, 2015. "Unaffordable housing and local employment growth: Evidence from California municipalities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(6), pages 1134-1151, May.
    13. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    14. Miceli, Thomas J. & Sirmans, C.F., 2007. "The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 309-319, November.
    15. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    16. Daniel Czamanski & Rafael Roth, 2011. "Characteristic time, developers’ behavior and leapfrogging dynamics of high-rise buildings," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 101-118, February.
    17. Gallagher, Ryan M., 2016. "The fiscal externality of multifamily housing and its impact on the property tax: Evidence from cities and schools, 1980–2010," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 249-259.
    18. Duranton, Gilles & Puga, Diego, 2014. "The Growth of Cities," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 5, pages 781-853, Elsevier.
    19. Ehrlich, Maximilian V. & Hilber, Christian A.L. & Schöni, Olivier, 2018. "Institutional settings and urban sprawl: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 4-18.
    20. Todd Sinai, 2010. "Feedback Between Real Estate And Urban Economics," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 423-448, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2013_173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.