IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.04015.html

Serial Top Trading Cycles and the Exclusion Core in Mixed-Ownership Object Allocation Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Bettina Klaus
  • Yang Chen
  • Anh Tri^eu

Abstract

We study Balbuzanov and Kotowski's (2019) exclusion core for object allocation problems with complex endowments. We focus on mixed-ownership object allocation problems in which each object is either individually owned by one agent or publicly owned by all agents. Given a priority order over agents, an endowment structure, an initial allocation, and agents' preferences, we construct serial top trading cycles (STTC) graphs and define the associated STTC algorithm. The algorithm is the central tool for our analysis of exclusion-core-stable allocations. First, we show that, among domains defined by restrictions on endowment structures, the mixed-ownership domain is the largest on which the STTC algorithms characterize the exclusion core. Second, we provide a simple test for exclusion core stability: an allocation is exclusion core stable if and only if it is a fixed point of the STTC algorithm initialized at that allocation, independently of the priority order. Third, we show that the exclusion core is a von Neumann--Morgenstern (1944) stable set with respect to exclusion-domination. Finally, we study a dynamic exclusion-blocking process and show that, from any allocation, there exists a self-contained exclusion-blocking path to the exclusion core.

Suggested Citation

  • Bettina Klaus & Yang Chen & Anh Tri^eu, 2026. "Serial Top Trading Cycles and the Exclusion Core in Mixed-Ownership Object Allocation Problems," Papers 2610.04015, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.04015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.04015
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shapley, Lloyd & Scarf, Herbert, 1974. "On cores and indivisibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 23-37, March.
    2. Diamantoudi, Effrosyni & Miyagawa, Eiichi & Xue, Licun, 2004. "Random paths to stability in the roommate problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 18-28, July.
    3. Roberto Serrano & Oscar Volij, 2008. "Mistakes in Cooperation: The Stochastic Stability of Edgeworth's Recontracting," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(532), pages 1719-1741, October.
    4. Ivan Balbuzanov & Maciej H. Kotowski, 2019. "Endowments, Exclusion, and Exchange," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(5), pages 1663-1692, September.
    5. Ishida, Wataru & Park, Changwoo, 2026. "Group incentive-compatible allocation of discrete resources when ownership is partitioned," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 287-309.
    6. Hylland, Aanund & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1979. "The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(2), pages 293-314, April.
    7. Klaus, Bettina & Klijn, Flip, 2007. "Paths to stability for matching markets with couples," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 154-171, January.
    8. Lars-Gunnar Svensson, 1999. "Strategy-proof allocation of indivisible goods," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 16(4), pages 557-567.
    9. Sun, Xiang & Tang, Qianfeng & Xiao, Mingjun & Zhang, Jun, 2026. "On the core of markets with co-ownerships and indivisibilities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Kotowski, Maciej H., 2024. "The property rights theory of production networks," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(4), November.
    11. Roth, Alvin E. & Postlewaite, Andrew, 1977. "Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 131-137, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishida, Wataru & Park, Changwoo, 2026. "Group incentive-compatible allocation of discrete resources when ownership is partitioned," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 287-309.
    2. Sun, Xiang & Tang, Qianfeng & Xiao, Mingjun & Zhang, Jun, 2026. "On the core of markets with co-ownerships and indivisibilities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Afacan, Mustafa Oğuz & Hu, Gaoji & Li, Jiangtao, 2024. "Housing markets since Shapley and Scarf," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Bettina Klaus & David F. Manlove & Francesca Rossi, 2014. "Matching under Preferences," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 14.07, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    5. Kesten, Onur, 2009. "Why do popular mechanisms lack efficiency in random environments?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(5), pages 2209-2226, September.
    6. Tang, Qianfeng & Zhu, Zhan, 2025. "Ekici’s reclaim-proof allocations revisited," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    7. YIlmaz, Özgür, 2010. "The probabilistic serial mechanism with private endowments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 475-491, July.
    8. Ehlers, Lars & Klaus, Bettina & Papai, Szilvia, 2002. "Strategy-proofness and population-monotonicity for house allocation problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 329-339, November.
    9. Sumit Goel & Yuki Tamura, 2025. "TTC Domains," Papers 2501.15422, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    10. Hong, Miho & Park, Jaeok, 2022. "Core and top trading cycles in a market with indivisible goods and externalities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Miyagawa, Eiichi, 2001. "House Allocation with Transfers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 329-355, October.
    12. Kamijo, Yoshio & Kawasaki, Ryo, 2010. "Dynamics, stability, and foresight in the Shapley-Scarf housing market," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 214-222, March.
    13. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    14. Atila Abdulkadiroglu & Tayfun Sönmez, 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 729-747, June.
    15. Mustafa Oǧuz Afacan, 2019. "Matching with restricted trade," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(3), pages 957-977, September.
    16. Tayfun Sönmez & M. Utku Ünver, 2006. "Kidney Exchange with Good Samaritan Donors: A Characterization," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 640, Boston College Department of Economics.
    17. Roth, Alvin E. & Sonmez, Tayfun & Utku Unver, M., 2005. "Pairwise kidney exchange," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 151-188, December.
    18. Karakaya, Mehmet & Klaus, Bettina & Schlegel, Jan Christoph, 2019. "Top trading cycles, consistency, and acyclic priorities for house allocation with existing tenants," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Yao Cheng & Di Feng, 2025. "On fairness of multi-center allocation problems," Papers 2509.21812, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    20. Atila ABDULKAD RO LU & Tayfun S NMEZ, 2014. "[School Choice: A Mechanism Desing Approach], Okul Se imi: Bir Mekanizma Tasar m Yakla m," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, EconSciences Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 302-326, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.04015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.