IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.00581.html

The Anatomy of Commodity Risk: Micro, Market, and Economy-Wide Sources

Author

Listed:
  • Nektarios Aslanidis
  • Aurelio Bariviera
  • George Kapetanios
  • Vasilis Sarafidis
  • Alexia Ventouri

Abstract

We study the anatomy of commodity risk by distinguishing micro, market-level, and economy-wide sources. We develop a two-stage "divide-and-conquer" framework that allows sensitivities to these risk sources to vary across commodities while treating economy-wide risk as latent. The first stage uses defactored instrumental-variable estimation to recover commodity-specific sensitivities to micro and market conditions. The second combines principal components with high-dimensional variable selection to identify an observable representation of macro-financial risk. We then construct Risk Intensity Indices (RIIs), which combine estimated sensitivities with prevailing risk conditions to quantify the relative importance of each risk source on a common scale. Market risk is the largest component on average, accounting for about two fifths of total risk intensity and more than half for energy commodities. Risk intensity is also highly concentrated across individual commodities: the top 20% account for approximately half of micro and market risk intensity, whereas macro risk is more broadly dispersed. The composition of risk varies substantially across sectors and over time, with market risk becoming particularly prominent during episodes of commodity-market stress. Micro and market RIIs also contain information about future volatility and absolute returns. These findings provide investors, risk managers, and policymakers with a diagnostic of where commodity risk is concentrated, which risk layers are most important, and how their importance changes over time. More broadly, our divide-and-conquer framework provides a flexible approach to decomposing layered risk in settings where common risk is latent.

Suggested Citation

  • Nektarios Aslanidis & Aurelio Bariviera & George Kapetanios & Vasilis Sarafidis & Alexia Ventouri, 2026. "The Anatomy of Commodity Risk: Micro, Market, and Economy-Wide Sources," Papers 2610.00581, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.00581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.00581
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dario Caldara & Matteo Iacoviello, 2022. "Measuring Geopolitical Risk," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1194-1225, April.
    2. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 967-1012, July.
    3. Hyungsik Roger Moon & Martin Weidner, 2015. "Linear Regression for Panel With Unknown Number of Factors as Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 1543-1579, July.
    4. Caldara, Dario & Iacoviello, Matteo & Molligo, Patrick & Prestipino, Andrea & Raffo, Andrea, 2020. "The economic effects of trade policy uncertainty," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 38-59.
    5. Aruoba, S. BoraÄŸan & Diebold, Francis X. & Scotti, Chiara, 2009. "Real-Time Measurement of Business Conditions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 417-427.
    6. Craig S. Hakkio & William R. Keeton, 2009. "Financial stress: what is it, how can it be measured, and why does it matter?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 94(Q II), pages 5-50.
    7. Juodis, Artūras & Sarafidis, Vasilis, 2022. "An incidental parameters free inference approach for panels with common shocks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 19-54.
    8. Jushan Bai, 2009. "Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1229-1279, July.
    9. Serdar Ongan & Ismet Gocer & Cem Işık, 2025. "Introducing the New ESG‐Based Sustainability Uncertainty Index (ESGUI)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4457-4467, June.
    10. Norkutė, Milda & Sarafidis, Vasilis & Yamagata, Takashi & Cui, Guowei, 2021. "Instrumental variable estimation of dynamic linear panel data models with defactored regressors and a multifactor error structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 416-446.
    11. Kyle Jurado & Sydney C. Ludvigson & Serena Ng, 2015. "Measuring Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(3), pages 1177-1216, March.
    12. Vasilis Sarafidis & Tom Wansbeek, 2012. "Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Analysis," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 483-531, September.
    13. G. Kapetanios, 2008. "A bootstrap procedure for panel data sets with many cross-sectional units," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 11(2), pages 377-395, July.
    14. Abiad, Abdul & Qureshi, Irfan A., 2023. "The macroeconomic effects of oil price uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    15. Jushan Bai, 2003. "Inferential Theory for Factor Models of Large Dimensions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 135-171, January.
    16. Seung C. Ahn & Alex R. Horenstein, 2013. "Eigenvalue Ratio Test for the Number of Factors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 1203-1227, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Jia & Cui, Guowei & Sarafidis, Vasilis & Yamagata, Takashi, 2025. "IV Estimation of Heterogeneous Spatial Dynamic Panel Models with Interactive Effects," MPRA Paper 123497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Aslanidis, Nektarios & Bariviera, Aurelio & Kapetanios, George & Sarafidis, Vasilis, 2025. "Heterogeneous Exposures to Systematic and Idiosyncratic Risk across Crypto Assets: A Divide-and-Conquer Approach," MPRA Paper 125124, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Guowei Cui & Milda NorkutÄ— & Vasilis Sarafidis & Takashi Yamagata, 2022. "Two-stage instrumental variable estimation of linear panel data models with interactive effects [Eigenvalue ratio test for the number of factors]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 340-361.
    4. Norkutė, Milda & Sarafidis, Vasilis & Yamagata, Takashi & Cui, Guowei, 2021. "Instrumental variable estimation of dynamic linear panel data models with defactored regressors and a multifactor error structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 416-446.
    5. Guowei Cui & Vasilis Sarafidis & Takashi Yamagata, 2023. "IV estimation of spatial dynamic panels with interactive effects: large sample theory and an application on bank attitude towards risk," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 124-146.
    6. Hansen, Christian & Liao, Yuan, 2019. "The Factor-Lasso And K-Step Bootstrap Approach For Inference In High-Dimensional Economic Applications," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 465-509, June.
    7. De Vos, Ignace & Stauskas, Ovidijus, 2024. "Cross-section bootstrap for CCE regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(1).
    8. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ossola, Elisa & Scaillet, Olivier, 2019. "A diagnostic criterion for approximate factor structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 503-521.
    9. Li, Kunpeng & Lu, Lina, 2014. "Efficient estimation of heterogeneous coefficients in panel data models with common shock," MPRA Paper 59312, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Georg Keilbar & Juan M. Rodriguez-Poo & Alexandra Soberon & Weining Wang, 2022. "A projection based approach for interactive fixed effects panel data models," Papers 2201.11482, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    11. Freeman, Hugo & Weidner, Martin, 2023. "Linear panel regressions with two-way unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    12. Shi, Wei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2017. "Spatial dynamic panel data models with interactive fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 323-347.
    13. Bai, Jushan & Liao, Yuan, 2017. "Inferences in panel data with interactive effects using large covariance matrices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 59-78.
    14. Jörg Breitung & Philipp Hansen, 2021. "Correction to: Alternative estimation approaches for the factor augmented panel data model with small T," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3557-3558, December.
    15. Wei Shi & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "The effects of gun control on crimes: a spatial interactive fixed effects approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 233-263, August.
    16. Ayden Higgins, 2021. "Fixed $T$ Estimation of Linear Panel Data Models with Interactive Fixed Effects," Papers 2110.05579, arXiv.org.
    17. Hong, Shengjie & Su, Liangjun & Jiang, Tao, 2023. "Profile GMM estimation of panel data models with interactive fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 927-948.
    18. Fei Liu & Jiti Gao & Yanrong Yang, 2019. "Nonparametric Estimation in Panel Data Models with Heterogeneity and Time Varyingness," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 24/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Mugnier, Martin, 2025. "A simple and computationally trivial estimator for grouped fixed effects models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    20. Gagliardini, Patrick & Ossola, Elisa & Scaillet, Olivier, 2020. "Estimation of large dimensional conditional factor models in finance," Handbook of Econometrics, in: Steven N. Durlauf & Lars Peter Hansen & James J. Heckman & Rosa L. Matzkin (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 7, chapter 0, pages 219-282, Elsevier.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.00581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.