IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.09378.html

Scaling laws of Stablecoin Transactions: Evidence from USDT and USDC on the Ethereum blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • Kundan Mukhia
  • Sabat Rai
  • Vivek Shrivastav
  • Imran Ansari
  • Md. Nurujjaman

Abstract

Stablecoins have rapidly emerged as an important class of digital assets and a component of the digital financial ecosystem. Despite their growing importance, the statistical properties of stablecoin transaction activity remain largely unexplored. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate scaling behavior in stablecoin transaction data, focusing on USDT and USDC. We analyze approximately 370 million USDT and USDC transactions recorded on the Ethereum blockchain across six periods spanning June 2024 to February 2026. Based on interactions between Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) and Smart Contracts (SCs), we classify transactions into four categories: EOA-EOA, EOA-SC, SC-EOA, and SC-SC. Using maximum-likelihood estimation of power-law exponents, we find that transaction value distributions exhibit heavy-tailed scaling for both stablecoins across all periods and interaction categories. We identify two distinct scaling regimes: EOA-involved categories cluster around 1.45-1.60, whereas SC-SC transactions exhibit higher exponents of approximately 1.72-1.73. Sensitivity analysis confirms that this separation is robust across periods, stablecoins, and fitting sample sizes. Counterfactual analysis shows that changes in category weights alone cannot explain the observed variation in the overall exponent. Across different sample sizes, the counterfactual path accounts for only about 10%-35% of the total temporal range observed in the actual data. Overall, our results indicate two broadly differentiated scaling regimes in the tail of stablecoin transaction values. Power-law tail behavior is observed throughout stablecoin transaction activity, but the exponent depends on whether transactions are driven by EOAs or SCs. These findings provide a basis for further research on scaling behavior and transaction heterogeneity in blockchain-based financial systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kundan Mukhia & Sabat Rai & Vivek Shrivastav & Imran Ansari & Md. Nurujjaman, 2026. "Scaling laws of Stablecoin Transactions: Evidence from USDT and USDC on the Ethereum blockchain," Papers 2608.09378, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.09378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.09378
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lux, Thomas & Alfarano, Simone, 2016. "Financial power laws: Empirical evidence, models, and mechanisms," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 3-18.
    2. Douglas Arner & Raphael Auer & Jon Frost, 2020. "Stablecoins: risks, potential and regulation," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    3. Douglas Arner & Raphael Auer & Jon Frost, 2020. "Stablecoins: risks, potential and regulation," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    4. Douglas Arner & Raphael Auer & Jon Frost, 2020. "Stablecoins: potential, risks and regulation," BIS Working Papers 905, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Plamen Ch. Ivanov & Ainslie Yuen & Boris Podobnik & Youngki Lee, 2004. "Common Scaling Patterns in Intertrade Times of U. S. Stocks," Papers cond-mat/0403662, arXiv.org.
    6. M. Goldstein & S. Morris & G. Yen, 2004. "Problems with fitting to the power-law distribution," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 41(2), pages 255-258, September.
    7. Duan, Kun & Urquhart, Andrew, 2023. "The instability of stablecoins," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    8. Ke Wu & Spencer Wheatley & Didier Sornette, 2018. "Classification of cryptocurrency coins and tokens by the dynamics of their market capitalisations," Papers 1803.03088, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    9. Christian Catalini & Alonso de Gortari & Nihar Shah, 2022. "Some Simple Economics of Stablecoins," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 117-135, November.
    10. Douglas Arner & Raphael Auer & Jon Frost, 2020. "Stablecoins: risks, potential and regulation," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    11. Parameswaran Gopikrishnan & Martin Meyer & Luis A Nunes Amaral & H Eugene Stanley, 1998. "Inverse Cubic Law for the Probability Distribution of Stock Price Variations," Papers cond-mat/9803374, arXiv.org, revised May 1998.
    12. Kundan Mukhia & SR Luwang & Md. Nurujjaman & Tanujit Chakraborty & Suman Saha & Chittaranjan Hens, 2025. "Universal Patterns in the Blockchain: Analysis of EOAs and Smart Contracts in ERC20 Token Networks," Papers 2508.04671, arXiv.org.
    13. Yuki Sato & Kiyoshi Kanazawa, 2024. "Strict universality of the square-root law in price impact across stocks: a complete survey of the Tokyo stock exchange," Papers 2411.13965, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    14. Francesca Carapella & Arazi Lubis & Alexandros Vardoulakis, 2026. "Stablecoins in 2025: Developments and Financial Stability Implications," FEDS Notes 2026-04-08-2, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    15. Lyons, Richard K. & Viswanath-Natraj, Ganesh, 2023. "What keeps stablecoins stable?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Zhou, Wei-Xing & Yuan, Wei-Kang, 2005. "Inverse statistics in stock markets: Universality and idiosyncracy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 353(C), pages 433-444.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionysopoulos, Lambis & Urquhart, Andrew, 2024. "10 years of stablecoins: Their impact, what we know, and future research directions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Gregory, Gadzinski & Alessio, Castello & Vito, Liuzzi & Patrice, Sargenti, 2024. "Break a peg! A study of stablecoin co-instability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    3. Saengchote, Kanis & Samphantharak, Krislert, 2024. "Digital money creation and algorithmic stablecoin run," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Hui, Cho-Hoi & Wong, Andrew & Lo, Chi-Fai, 2025. "Stablecoin price dynamics under a peg-stabilising mechanism," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant & Julien Guilbert, 2024. "Automated Market Making: the case of Pegged Assets," Papers 2411.08145, arXiv.org.
    6. Castrén, Olli & Russo, Riccardo, 2026. "Runs, transparency and regulation: On the optimal design of stablecoin frameworks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    7. Vanhoudt Patrick, 2026. "Anchoring Europe’s Monetary Future: Why a Wholesale Digital Euro Is the Immediate Priority," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Paradigm, vol. 61(2), pages 73-80.
    8. Dean Fantazzini, 2025. "Detecting Stablecoin Failure with Simple Thresholds and Panel Binary Models: The Pivotal Role of Lagged Market Capitalization and Volatility," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-47, November.
    9. Fernandez-Mejia, Julian, 2024. "Extremely stablecoins," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Office of Financial Research (ed.), 2021. "2021 Annual Report to Congress," Reports, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury, number 21-01.
    11. Marcel Bluhm & Adrian Cachinero Vasiljevi'c & S'ebastien Derivaux & S{o}ren Terp H{o}rluck Jessen, 2024. "Real-time Risk Metrics for Programmatic Stablecoin Crypto Asset-Liability Management (CALM)," Papers 2401.13399, arXiv.org.
    12. Vidal-Tomás, David, 2025. "Centralized exchanges & proof-of-solvency: The guardians of trust," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. José Zapata Sevilla, 2024. "Analysing decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs): limits and perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 425-436, December.
    14. Alistair Milne & Vivienne Lawack, 2024. "Digital assets in payments and transaction banking," Working Papers 11073, South African Reserve Bank.
    15. Cupak, Andrej & Gertler, Pavel & Hajdiak, Daniel & Klacso, Ján & Rychtárik, Štefan, 2026. "Determinants of digital euro adoption: The role of political orientation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Matteo Aquilina & Giulio Cornelli & Jon Frost & Leonardo Gambacorta, 2025. "Cryptocurrencies and decentralised finance: functions and financial stability implications," BIS Papers, Bank for International Settlements, number 156, May.
    17. Barthélemy, Jean & Gardin, Paul & Nguyen, Benoit, 2026. "Stablecoins and short-term funding markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Aquilina, Matteo & Frost, Jon & Schrimpf, Andreas, 2024. "Tackling the risks in crypto: Choosing among bans, containment and regulation," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Bibi, Samuele, 2023. "Money in the time of crypto," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Le, Thai Hong & Luu, Hiep Ngoc & Do, Dinh Dinh & Nguyen, Trung-Anh & Pham, Toan Canh, 2025. "On the connectedness between the uncertainty of central bank digital currency adoption and stablecoins," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.09378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.