IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.00917.html

Pro-rata mechanisms in groundwater markets

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Cialenco
  • Michael Ludkovski
  • Gael Dimitri Tekam Fongouo

Abstract

We introduce a pro-rata rationing mechanism for resolving supply-demand imbalances in groundwater markets, extending the price-formation model of Cialenco and Ludkovski (2025). We show that under the pro-rata distribution, every price is a Nash equilibrium, thereby pro-rata approach provides a rationing device whenever supply and demand fail to match. By the very nature of the pro-rata mechanism, the resolution of supply-demand imbalances is unique, and the proportional rationing approach is fair. First, we consider markets with exogenous restrictions on the amounts each agent may buy and/or sell, deriving closed-form first-best consumption and characterizing how one-sided caps monotonically shift the Pareto price, while two-sided caps have an ambiguous effect. These results give the market-maker (or regulator) a tool for studying the impact of trading restrictions on price formation. Second, we study a leader-follower setting in which a regulator (the leader) sets the trading price by optimizing first its own objective, such as balancing social welfare against a target traded volume or a fairness objective such as Gini-type disparity measure across farmers' profitability, while farmers (the `followers') respond via pro-rata trading. We further compare the proposed pro-rata approach to a family of asymmetric rationing schemes (seniority-based, excess-based, uniform, and mixed pro-rata rules) that trade off proportional fairness against protections for small or senior water-rights holders. Throughout, we illustrate the theoretical results with a numerical case study calibrated to a stylized four-farmer groundwater market.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Cialenco & Michael Ludkovski & Gael Dimitri Tekam Fongouo, 2026. "Pro-rata mechanisms in groundwater markets," Papers 2608.00917, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.00917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.00917
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin L. Weitzman, 1974. "Prices vs. Quantities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(4), pages 477-491.
    2. Jean-Jacques Laffont & Jean Tirole, 1993. "A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262121743, December.
    3. Margaret Insley & Peter A. Forsyth, 2019. "Climate games: Who’s on first? What’s on second?," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 95(2-3), pages 287-322.
    4. Ellen M. Bruno & Katrina Jessoe, 2024. "Designing water markets for climate change adaptation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 14(4), pages 331-339, April.
    5. Nicholas Ryan & Anant Sudarshan, 2022. "Rationing the Commons," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(1), pages 210-257.
    6. Kuwayama, Yusuke & Brozović, Nicholas, 2013. "The regulation of a spatially heterogeneous externality: Tradable groundwater permits to protect streams," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 364-382.
    7. Hervé Moulin, 2000. "Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 643-684, May.
    8. Andrew B. Ayres & Kyle C. Meng & Andrew J. Plantinga, 2021. "Do Environmental Markets Improve on Open Access? Evidence from California Groundwater Rights," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(10), pages 2817-2860.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Igor Cialenco & Michael Ludkovski, 2026. "Multiperiod Groundwater Markets," Papers 2605.26363, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    2. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    3. Yutaka Suzuki, 2021. "Collusion, Shading, and Optimal Organization Design in a Three-tier Agency Model with a Continuum of Types," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 22(2), pages 317-365, November.
    4. Aalbers, Rob & Shestalova, Victoria & Kocsis, Viktória, 2013. "Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1240-1250.
    5. Christian Elleby & Frank Jensen, 2018. "How Many Instruments Do We Really Need? A First-Best Optimal Solution to Multiple Objectives with Fisheries Regulation," IFRO Working Paper 2018/05, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Fabra, Natalia & Montero, Juan Pablo, 2020. "Technology-Neutral vs. Technology-Specific Procurement," CEPR Discussion Papers 15554, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Dan Wang & Peng Hao & Jiancheng Wang, 2023. "Quantities vs. prices: monopoly regulation without transfer under asymmetric demand information," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 177-205, June.
    8. Ambec, Stefan & Coria, Jessica, 2021. "The informational value of environmental taxes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Valentin Bellassen & Igor Shishlov, 2017. "Pricing Monitoring Uncertainty in Climate Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(4), pages 949-974, December.
    10. Holland, Stephen P. & Yates, Andrew J., 2015. "Optimal trading ratios for pollution permit markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 16-27.
    11. Rey, Patrick & Salant, David, 2012. "Abuse of dominance and licensing of intellectual property," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 518-527.
    12. Fred Schroyen & Adekola Oyenuga, 2011. "Optimal pricing and capacity choice for a public service under risk of interruption," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 252-272, June.
    13. Zheng, Shiyuan & Wang, Chunan & Jiang, Changmin, 2024. "Carrot or stick? Environmental and welfare implications of sustainable aviation fuel policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Fabra, Natalia, 2021. "The energy transition: An industrial economics perspective," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Lachhab, Rania & Bruno, Ellen, 2026. "The Value of Water Storage: Evidence from California’s Kern Water Bank," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404731, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yusuke Kuwayama & Nicholas Brozović, 2017. "Optimal Management of Environmental Externalities with Time Lags and Uncertainty," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(3), pages 473-499, November.
    17. Blair, Benjamin F. & Lewis, Tracy R. & Sappington, David E. M., 1995. "Simple regulatory policies in the presence of demand and cost uncertainty," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 57-73, April.
    18. Sundaresan, Suresh & Xiao, Kairong, 2024. "Liquidity regulation and banks: Theory and evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Ayres, Andrew B. & Bruno, Ellen M., 2025. "Do Water Markets Drive Ownership Consolidation? Evidence from California’s Mojave Desert," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360733, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Stavins, Robert & Keohane, Nathaniel & Revesz, Richard, 1997. "The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-25, Resources for the Future.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.00917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.