IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.29227.html

The Human-Machine Knowledge Spiral

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Chatterji
  • Daniel Rock
  • Eduard Talamas

Abstract

Nonaka emphasized that innovation is the result of a continuous back-and-forth between tacit and explicit knowledge. Artificial intelligence introduces a fundamentally new object into this process -- tacit machine knowledge -- but Nonaka's ideas are more relevant than ever. The central role of the knowledge-creating company remains the same: to create the shared context in which different kinds of knowledge can feed off each other, become organizational knowledge, and set off further cycles of innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamas, 2026. "The Human-Machine Knowledge Spiral," Papers 2606.29227, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.29227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.29227
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathrin Kirchner & Enrico Scarso, 2026. "Revisiting the SECI Model: The Impact of Generative AI on Organizational Knowledge Creation," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, in: Ettore Bolisani & Maayan Nakash & Constantin Bratianu & Ruxandra Bejinaru (ed.), Managing Human and Artificial Knowledge, pages 105-125, Springer.
    2. Drew Johnston & David Holtz & Alex Martin Richmond & Christopher Ong & Prasanna Tambe & Aaron Chatterji, 2026. "The Shift to Agentic AI: Evidence from Codex," Papers 2606.26959, arXiv.org.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    4. David Autor, 2024. "Applying AI to Rebuild Middle Class Jobs," NBER Working Papers 32140, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Enrique Ide & Eduard Talamàs, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in the Knowledge Economy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(12), pages 3762-3800.
    6. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    7. Udo Zander & Bruce Kogut, 1995. "Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 76-92, February.
    8. Dennis Epple & Linda Argote & Rukmini Devadas, 1991. "Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 58-70, February.
    9. Enrique Ide & Eduard Talamas, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence in the Knowledge Economy," Papers 2312.05481, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ide, Enrique & Talamàs, Eduard, 2026. "The impact of AI on global knowledge work," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Argote, Linda & Fahrenkopf, Erin, 2016. "Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 146-159.
    3. F. S. Zijlstra & A. A. Alblas & F. Langerak, 2024. "Cross-Site and Cross-Generation Knowledge Transfer in High-Tech After-Sales Service," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 155-171, September.
    4. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    5. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Who Benefits from AI? Self-Selection, Skill Gap, and the Hidden Costs of AI Feedback," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    6. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    7. Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamas, 2025. "Transformative AI and Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Kris Hoang & Steven E. Salterio & Jim Sylph, 2018. "Barriers to Transferring Auditing Research to Standard Setters," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 427-452, September.
    9. Maurizio Zollo & Jeffrey J. Reuer, 2001. "Experience Spillovers across Corporate Development Activities," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 01-35, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    10. Sharique Hasan & Alexander Oettl & Sampsa Samila, 2025. "From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI," Papers 2506.22440, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    11. Aísa, Rosa & Cabeza, Josefina, 2025. "Artificial intelligence: Redefining the retirement pattern," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3).
    12. Andrew Caplin & David Deming & Shangwen Li & Daniel Martin & Philip Marx & Ben Weidmann & Kadachi Jiada Ye, 2026. "The ABCs of Who Benefits from Working with AI: Ability, Beliefs, and Calibration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(7), pages 5843-5852, July.
    13. Mohajan, Haradhan Kumar, 2016. "Knowledge is an Essential Element at Present World," International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 1(1), pages 31-53.
    14. Wonsang Ryu & Brian T. McCann & William P. Wan, 2022. "Learning by doing and corporate diversification," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1635-1665, August.
    15. Anupam Agrawal & Suresh Muthulingam, 2015. "Does Organizational Forgetting Affect Vendor Quality Performance? An Empirical Investigation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 350-367, July.
    16. Dimo Ringov & Aman Asija & John Joseph & Gabriel Szulanski, 2026. "Dual Demands, Attention, and Organizational Learning: Spatial and Temporal Replication of Routines in Scaling Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 915-941, May.
    17. Nissen, Mark E., 2019. "Initiating a system for visualizing and measuring dynamic knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 169-181.
    18. Matthew O. Jackson & Zafer Kanik, 2026. "The Economic Benefits and Costs of AI and Policies to Mitigate AI's Impact on Inequality," Papers 2607.01101, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    19. Chen, Qin & Ge, Jinfeng & Xie, Huaqing & Xu, Xingcheng & Yang, Yanqing, 2025. "Large language models at work in China’s labor market," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Kim, Youngsoo, 2022. "Taxi driver’s learning curves: An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.29227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.