IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.23825.html

Trade Liberalization and Product Innovation: The Dynamic Role of Exporting

Author

Listed:
  • Sizhong Sun

Abstract

How does trade liberalization affect firms' incentives to innovate? We answer this question using China's WTO accession and a dynamic model of firms' joint export and product-innovation decisions. We find that trade liberalization reduced iceberg trade costs by approximately 13.5 percent in the air-conditioner manufacturing industry, which substantially increased the probability of export and product innovation. Moreover, the response is driven primarily by dynamic rather than static incentives. Two dynamic mechanisms are central: exporting and innovating lead firms to predict more favorable transitions to better productivity states and reduce future entry costs, thereby raising the returns to subsequent innovation. Counterfactual decompositions show that these mechanisms account for the majority of the innovation response. For firms in an intermediate productivity state, the direct static effect (without entry-cost saving and state transition) accounts for only 9.2 percent of the total effect of WTO accession. Shutting down state transition leads to 62.4 percent of the total effect, while shutting down entry-cost saving results in 28.5 percent. The results demonstrate that the innovation effects of trade liberalization are substantially amplified by firms' endogenous dynamic responses, highlighting the importance of accounting for state transitions and forward-looking decisions when evaluating the gains from trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Sizhong Sun, 2026. "Trade Liberalization and Product Innovation: The Dynamic Role of Exporting," Papers 2603.23825, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.23825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23825
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giammario Impullitti & Omar Licandro, 2018. "Trade, Firm Selection and Innovation: The Competition Channel," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(608), pages 189-229, February.
    2. Paula Bustos, 2011. "Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 304-340, February.
    3. Jaap H. Abbring, 2010. "Identification of Dynamic Discrete Choice Models," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 367-394, September.
    4. Andrew Atkeson & Ariel Tomás Burstein, 2010. "Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 118(3), pages 433-484, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicola Borri & Yukun Liu & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2026. "The Cross-Section of Stock Returns and AI Exposure," Papers 2606.30583, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    2. Nicola Borri & Aleh Tsyvinski & Yukun Liu, 2026. "AI Premium," NBER Working Papers 35451, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc J. Melitz & Stephen J. Redding, 2021. "Trade and innovation," CEP Discussion Papers dp1777, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Damián Migueles Chazarreta & Ignat Stepanok, 2025. "Intellectual property rights protection and the dynamic gains from trade," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 79(2), pages 445-495, March.
    3. Xiao Ma, 2024. "College Expansion, Trade, And Innovation: Evidence From China," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(1), pages 315-351, February.
    4. Antonio Navas & Antonella Nocco, 2021. "Trade liberalization, selection, and technology adoption with vertical linkages," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 979-1012, September.
    5. Zhou, Hua & Zhang, Xiaodong & Yang, Lun, 2025. "Balancing export intensity and innovation: Uncovering the inverted-U relationship in Chinese manufacturing firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1830-1845.
    6. L. Benfratello & A. Bottasso & C. Piccardo, 2022. "R&D and export performance: exploring heterogeneity along the export intensity distribution," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(2), pages 189-232, June.
    7. Haruyama, Tetsugen & Zhao, Laixun, 2017. "Trade and firm heterogeneity in a Schumpeterian model of growth," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 540-563.
    8. Teteryatnikova, Mariya, 2018. "R&D in trade networks: The role of asymmetry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 307-350.
    9. Rizov, Marian & Vecchi, Michela & Domenech, Josep, 2022. "Going online: Forecasting the impact of websites on productivity and market structure," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 184, pages 1-46.
    10. Fabling, Richard & Sanderson, Lynda, 2013. "Exporting and firm performance: Market entry, investment and expansion," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 422-431.
    11. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Matthieu Lequien & Marc J. Melitz, 2024. "The Heterogeneous Impact of Market Size on Innovation: Evidence from French Firm-Level Exports," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(3), pages 608-626, May.
    12. Benedikt Heid, 2014. "Essays on International Trade and Development," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 55, September.
    13. Antonietti,Roberto & Marzucchi,Alberto, 2013. "Green investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201302, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    14. Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2012. "The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 283-313, July.
    15. repec:isu:genstf:202001010800009179 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Nicholas Bloom & Mirko Draca & John Van Reenen, 2016. "Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(1), pages 87-117.
    17. Reto Foellmi & Stefan Legge & Alexa Tiemann, 2021. "Innovation and trade in the presence of credit constraints," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 1168-1205, November.
    18. Gong, Robin Kaiji & Li, Yao Amber & Manova, Kalina & Sun, Stephen Teng, 2025. "Tickets to the global market: First US patent award and Chinese firm exports," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Halmai, Péter, 2024. "Mélyintegráció-paradigma [Deep-integration Paradigm]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 514-558.
    20. Katrin Peters & Monika Schnitzer, 2015. "Trade liberalization and credit constraints: Why opening up may fail to promote convergence," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 48(3), pages 1099-1119, August.
    21. Flora Bellone & Edwin Fourrier-Nicolaï & Simone Vannuccini, 2026. "Input Trade Shocks and the Direction of Innovation," GREDEG Working Papers 2026-17, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.23825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.