IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.03136.html

The Anatomy of Polymarket: Evidence from the 2024 Presidential Election

Author

Listed:
  • Kwok Ping Tsang
  • Zichao Yang

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive transaction-level analysis of Polymarket's 2024 U.S. Presidential Election market using complete on-chain data from the Polygon blockchain. Because blockchain-based prediction markets involve heterogeneous trade mechanisms: share minting, burning, and conversion alongside conventional exchange, naive aggregation of on-chain flows can misrepresent actual trading volume. To address this, we develop a volume decomposition that yields three complementary measures of market activity: exchange-equivalent trading volume, net inflow, and gross market activity. Applying this framework, we document three key episodes that shaped the market: Biden's withdrawal, the September presidential debate, and the emergence of whale traders in October. As trading volume grew, arbitrage deviations narrowed, Kyle's $\lambda$ declined by more than an order of magnitude, and cross-market participation broadened, painting a consistent picture of a market that matured over its ten-month life.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwok Ping Tsang & Zichao Yang, 2026. "The Anatomy of Polymarket: Evidence from the 2024 Presidential Election," Papers 2603.03136, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.03136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.03136
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.03136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.