IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.16631.html

Can Wearable Exoskeletons Reduce Gender and Disability Gaps in the Construction Industry?

Author

Listed:
  • Yana Rodgers
  • Xiangmin Liu
  • Jingang Yi
  • Liang Zhang

Abstract

The share of construction trade jobs held by women and people with disabilities has remained stubbornly low in the face of chronic shortages of skilled labor. This study explores the potential of wearable assistive technologies to reduce these disparities. We use U.S. worker-level data to estimate employment and wage differences by gender and by mobility/strength impairments in construction and non-construction jobs. We also use occupational-level data to examine variations in workforce composition, physical skill requirements, and earnings across detailed construction occupations. Regression estimates indicate that being a woman and having strength and mobility impairments are associated with substantial employment and pay gaps in construction compared to non-construction jobs. Further analysis shows a high negative correlation between the representation of women and the ability levels required in those occupations. Finally, we discuss several wearable exoskeletons under development for people with upper-body and lower-body impairments, focusing on how these innovations could be integrated into construction jobs. These findings suggest that wearable exoskeletons that enhance manual dexterity, balance, and strength may improve the representation of women and people with disabilities in some of the higher-paying occupations in construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yana Rodgers & Xiangmin Liu & Jingang Yi & Liang Zhang, 2026. "Can Wearable Exoskeletons Reduce Gender and Disability Gaps in the Construction Industry?," Papers 2602.16631, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.16631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.16631
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Krzywdzinski & Maren Evers & Christine Gerber, 2024. "Control and Flexibility: The Use of Wearable Devices in Capital- and Labor-Intensive Work Processes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(4), pages 506-534, August.
    2. Ernst Ekkehardt & Merola Rossana & Samaan Daniel, 2019. "Economics of Artificial Intelligence: Implications for the Future of Work," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, June.
    3. Linda Clarke & Marc van der Meer & Cecilie Bingham & Elisabeth Michielsens & Sue Miller, 2009. "Enabling and disabling: disability in the British and Dutch construction sectors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 555-566.
    4. Sandra Fielden & Marilyn Davidson & Andrew Gale & Caroline Davey, 2000. "Women in construction: the untapped resource," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 113-121.
    5. Avoyan, Ala & He, Haoran & Lu, Kelin, 2025. "Team work under time constraints," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Michael J. Handel, 2016. "The O*NET content model: strengths and limitations [Stärken und Grenzen des O*NET-Models]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(2), pages 157-176, October.
    7. Handel, Michael J., 2016. "The O-NET content model: strengths and limitations," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 49(2), pages 157-176.
    8. Krzywdzinski, Martin & Evers, Maren & Gerber, Christine, 2024. "Control and Flexibility: The Use of Wearable Devices in Capital- and Labor-Intensive Work Processes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 77(4), pages 506-534.
    9. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero & Hogarth, Terence & Giordano, Vito & Baltina, Liga & Spada, Irene, 2021. "Towards ESCO 4.0 – Is the European classification of skills in line with Industry 4.0? A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. G. Jacob Blackwood & Cindy Cunningham & Matthew Dey & Lucia Foster & Cheryl Grim & John Haltiwanger & Rachel Nesbit & Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia & Jay Stewart & Cody Tuttle & Zoltan Wolf, 2023. "Opening the Black Box: Task and Skill Mix and Productivity Dispersion," NBER Chapters, in: Technology, Productivity, and Economic Growth, pages 323-360, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Chigusa Okamoto, 2019. "The effect of automation levels on US interstate migration," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(3), pages 519-539, December.
    4. Milena Nikolova & Anthony Lepinteur & Femke Cnossen, 2025. "Just another cog in the machine? A worker‐level view of robotization and tasks," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 92(368), pages 1101-1148, October.
    5. Fruehwirt, Wolfgang & Duckworth, Paul, 2021. "Towards better healthcare: What could and should be automated?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Böhm, Robert & Letmathe, Peter & Schinner, Matthias, 2023. "The monetary value of competencies: A novel method and case study in smart manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Hakan Yilmazkuday, 2025. "Artificial intelligence and labor markets: evidence from google trends," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 49(4), pages 1078-1093, December.
    8. repec:eur:ejesjr:364 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Pawel Gmyrek & Janine Berg & David Bescond, 2025. "Generative AI and Jobs: An Analysis of Potential Effects on Global Employment," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 6-30.
    10. Fareri, Silvia & Apreda, Riccardo & Mulas, Valentina & Alonso, Ruben, 2023. "The worker profiler: Assessing the digital skill gaps for enhancing energy efficiency in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. von Maydell, Richard, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and its Effect on Competition and Factor Income Shares," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277654, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association, revised 2024.
    12. Florencia Jaccoud, 2025. "Robots & AI exposure and wage inequality: a within occupation approach," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1035-1090, December.
    13. Damioli, G. & Van Roy, V. & Vertesy, D. & Vivarelli, M., 2021. "May AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," GLO Discussion Paper Series 823, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. repec:eur:ejesjr:361 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ünveren, Burak & Durmaz, Tunç & Sunal, Seçkin, 2023. "AI revolution and coordination failure: Theory and evidence," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Granata,Julia & Moroz,Harry Edmund & Nga Thi Nguyen, 2023. "Identifying Skills Needs in Vietnam: The Survey of Detailed Skills," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10565, The World Bank.
    17. Christenko, Aleksandr, 2022. "Automation and occupational mobility: A task and knowledge-based approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    19. Ximena P. Vergara & Kathryn Gibb & David P. Bui & Elisabeth Gebreegziabher & Elon Ullman & Kyle Peerless, 2025. "Extending a COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix: The SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 Job Exposure Matrix Module (SCoVJEM Module) for Population-Based Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Jaccoud, Florencia, 2025. "Robots & AI Exposure and Wage Inequality," MERIT Working Papers 2025-013, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    21. Mutascu, Mihai, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and unemployment: New insights," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 653-667.
    22. Evans, Andrew J., 2025. "Methodological implications of using machine learning to estimate the impact of AI on the workforce," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.16631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.