IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.03880.html

Women Worry, Men Adopt: How Gendered Perceptions Shape the Use of Generative AI

Author

Listed:
  • Fabian Stephany
  • Jedrzej Duszynski

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is diffusing rapidly, yet its adoption is strikingly unequal. Using nationally representative UK survey data from 2023 to 2024, we show that women adopt GenAI substantially less often than men because they perceive its societal risks differently. We construct a composite index capturing concerns about mental health, privacy, climate impact, and labor market disruption. This index explains between 9 and 18 percent of the variation in GenAI adoption and ranks among the strongest predictors for women across all age groups, surpassing digital literacy and education for young women. Intersectional analyses show that the largest disparities arise among younger, digitally fluent individuals with high societal risk concerns, where gender gaps in personal use exceed 45 percentage points. Using a synthetic twin panel design, we show that increased optimism about AI's societal impact raises GenAI use among young women from 13 percent to 33 percent, substantially narrowing the gender divide. These findings indicate that gendered perceptions of AI's social and ethical consequences, rather than access or capability, are the primary drivers of unequal GenAI adoption, with implications for productivity, skill formation, and economic inequality in an AI enabled economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabian Stephany & Jedrzej Duszynski, 2026. "Women Worry, Men Adopt: How Gendered Perceptions Shape the Use of Generative AI," Papers 2601.03880, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.03880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.03880
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Otis, Nicholas G. & Cranney, Katelyn & Delecourt, Solene & Koning, Rembrand, 2024. "Global Evidence on Gender Gaps and Generative AI," OSF Preprints h6a7c, Center for Open Science.
    2. Anders Humlum & Emilie Vestergaard, 2025. "The unequal adoption of ChatGPT exacerbates existing inequalities among workers," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122(1), pages 2414972121-, January.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:h6a7c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    5. Aldasoro, Iñaki & Armantier, Olivier & Doerr, Sebastian & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Oliviero, Tommaso, 2024. "The gen AI gender gap," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie Arntz & Myriam Baum & Eduard Brüll & Ralf Dorau & Matthias Hartwig & Britta Matthes & Sophie-Charlotte Meyer & Oliver Schlenker & Anita Tisch & Sascha Wischniewski, 2025. "Low Barriers, High Stakes: Formal and Informal Diffusion of AI in the Workplace," ifo Working Paper Series 422, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    3. Zara Contractor & Germán Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0359, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    4. Michael Blank & Gregor Schubert & Miao Ben Zhang, 2026. "The Household Impact of Generative AI: Evidence from Internet Browsing Behavior," Papers 2603.03144, arXiv.org.
    5. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Madathil, Johnson Clement, 2025. "Generative AI advertisements and Human–AI collaboration: The role of humans as gatekeepers of humanity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    8. Jacob Dominski & Yong Suk Lee, 2025. "Advancing AI Capabilities and Evolving Labor Outcomes," Papers 2507.08244, arXiv.org.
    9. Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamas, 2025. "Transformative AI and Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Piyush Gulati & Arianna Marchetti & Phanish Puranam & Victoria Sevcenko, 2025. "Generative AI Adoption and Higher Order Skills," Papers 2503.09212, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    11. Henry A. Thompson, 2026. "AI and the Law," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(1), pages 70-82, February.
    12. Fabian Kosse & Tim Leffler & Arna Woemmel, 2025. "Digital Skills: Social Disparities and the Impact of Early Mentoring," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1222, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Fabian Stephany & Ole Teutloff & Angelo Leone, 2026. "AI Skills Improve Job Prospects: Causal Evidence from a Hiring Experiment," Papers 2601.13286, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    14. James Bono & Alec Xu, 2024. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Security Copilot for IT Administrators," Papers 2411.01067, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    15. Li, Wei & Chang, Yaping & He, Yinghao & Li, Hong, 2025. "Research on fear of artificial intelligence among the elderly: The key of education and the prison of female," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Fiedler, Alexandra & Döpke, Jörg, 2025. "Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses☆," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Konstantinos Pouliakas & Giulia Santangelo & Paul Dupire, 2025. "Are artificial intelligence skills a reward or a gamble? Deconstructing the AI wage premium in Europe," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1091-1128, December.
    18. James Bono & Beibei Cheng & Joaquin Lozano, 2025. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Conditional Access Optimization Agent," Papers 2511.13865, arXiv.org.
    19. Sugat Chaturvedi & Rochana Chaturvedi, 2025. "Who Gets the Callback? Generative AI and Gender Bias," Papers 2504.21400, arXiv.org.
    20. Liu, Yan & Huang, Jingyun & Wang, He, 2025. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11231, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.03880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.