IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.17243.html

The Hidden Geometry of Global Aid: How Money Moves Through 10 Million Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Paul X. McCarthy
  • Xian Gong
  • Marian-Andrei Rizoiu
  • Paolo Boldi

Abstract

International aid is usually described as flows between countries, hiding the organisations money passes through. We reconstruct global aid's organisational network from 10.9 million International Aid Transparency Initiative records, tracing over one million payments worth about US\$1 trillion between 22,773 organisations. First, centrality, measured as how far a funder's money can travel downstream, is not size. Relative to their number of partners, giant bilateral donors (USAID, UK FCDO) are only as central as expected, while the most central positions belong to foundations (Gates, Hewlett), research organisations (ODI, University of Oxford) and delivery contractors (Mott MacDonald). Second, principal component analysis of eleven flow measures separates organisations along three lines: whether they mainly give or receive, how much money flows in, and how reliant they are on few partners. Humanitarian organisations emerge from the flows alone, tending to handle larger inflows. Third, almost all organisations form one connected network, yet money moves down long, one-way chains. Among five comparison networks, aid most resembles international banking, with a few large hubs feeding many small players, but has far fewer loops and is more strictly top-down. This suggests a system with little redundancy, where losing a major funder or intermediary could cut off organisations downstream, a pressing question after recent donor cuts.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul X. McCarthy & Xian Gong & Marian-Andrei Rizoiu & Paolo Boldi, 2025. "The Hidden Geometry of Global Aid: How Money Moves Through 10 Million Transactions," Papers 2512.17243, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.17243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.17243
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Weaver, 2010. "The politics of performance evaluation: Independent evaluation at the International Monetary Fund," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 365-385, September.
    2. Alesina, Alberto & Dollar, David, 2000. "Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 33-63, March.
    3. Dudley, Leonard & Montmarquette, Claude, 1976. "A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 132-142, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stijn Claessens & Danny Cassimon, 2007. "Empirical evidence on the new international aid architecture," WEF Working Papers 0026, ESRC World Economy and Finance Research Programme, Birkbeck, University of London.
    2. Robert K. Fleck & Christopher Kilby, 2006. "World Bank Independence: A Model and Statistical Analysis of US Influence," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 224-240, May.
    3. Iliana Olivié & Aitor Pérez, 2016. "Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 52-64, January.
    4. Buntaine, Mark T., 2011. "Does the Asian Development Bank Respond to Past Environmental Performance when Allocating Environmentally Risky Financing?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 336-350, March.
    5. Simon Feeny & Mark McGillivray, 2008. "What Determines Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence From Time Series Data," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 515-529, August.
    6. Hyun‐Hoon Lee & Donghyun Park & Meehwa Shin, 2015. "Do Developing‐country WTO Members Receive More Aid for Trade (AfT)?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1462-1485, September.
    7. Elkhan Richard Sadik-Zada, 2021. "An Ode to ODA against all Odds? A Novel Game-Theoretical and Empirical Reappraisal of the Terrorism-Aid Nexus," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(2), pages 221-240, June.
    8. Gupta, Hardik & Vadlamudy, Raveendra Saradhi, 2025. "From policy to practice: What drives climate orientation in development finance flows?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1344-1371.
    9. Hoeffler, Anke & Sterck, Olivier, 2022. "Is Chinese aid different?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Subhayu Bandyopadhyay & Sajal Lahiri & Javed Younas, 2012. "Do countries with greater credit constraints receive more foreign aid?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Nov, pages 481-493.
    11. Hendrik KRUSE & Thais NUNEZ-ROCHA & Camélia TURCU, 2019. "Infrastructure aid for resource trade? The crossroads of strategy and sustainable development," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2728, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    12. Travis Wiseman & Andrew Young, 2015. "Is foreign aid a pure public good for donor country citizens?," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 421-433, December.
    13. Yasuyuki SAWADA & Hiroyuki YAMADA & Takashi KUROSAKI, 2008. "Is Aid Allocation Consistent with Global Poverty Reduction?: A Cross-Donor Comparison," Discussion papers 08025, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    14. Nagae, Akira & Katayama, Hajime & Takase, Koichi, 2022. "Donor aid allocation and accounting standards of recipients," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Bandyopadhyay, Subhayu & Lahiri, Sajal & Younas, Javed, 2011. "Should Easier Access to International Credit Replace Foreign Aid?," IZA Discussion Papers 6024, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Rahman, Md Saifur & Giessen, Lukas, 2017. "Formal and Informal Interests of Donors to Allocate Aid: Spending Patterns of USAID, GIZ, and EU Forest Development Policy in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 250-267.
    17. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2017. "Structural economic vulnerability, openness and bilateral development aid flows," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-95.
    18. James Vreeland, 2011. "Foreign aid and global governance: Buying Bretton Woods – the Swiss-bloc case," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 369-391, September.
    19. Ryan Macdonald & John Hoddinott, 2004. "Determinants of Canadian bilateral aid allocations: humanitarian, commercial or political?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 294-312, May.
    20. Berthelemy, Jean-Claude & Tichit, Ariane, 2004. "Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions--a three-dimensional panel analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 253-274.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.17243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.