IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.16925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Approximate Least-Favorable Distributions and Nearly Optimal Tests via Stochastic Mirror Descent

Author

Listed:
  • Andr'es Aradillas Fern'andez
  • Jos'e Blanchet
  • Jos'e Luis Montiel Olea
  • Chen Qiu
  • Jorg Stoye
  • Lezhi Tan

Abstract

We consider a class of hypothesis testing problems where the null hypothesis postulates $M$ distributions for the observed data, and there is only one possible distribution under the alternative. We show that one can use a stochastic mirror descent routine for convex optimization to provably obtain - after finitely many iterations - both an approximate least-favorable distribution and a nearly optimal test, in a sense we make precise. Our theoretical results yield concrete recommendations about the algorithm's implementation, including its initial condition, its step size, and the number of iterations. Importantly, our suggested algorithm can be viewed as a slight variation of the algorithm suggested by Elliott, M\"uller, and Watson (2015), whose theoretical performance guarantees are unknown.

Suggested Citation

  • Andr'es Aradillas Fern'andez & Jos'e Blanchet & Jos'e Luis Montiel Olea & Chen Qiu & Jorg Stoye & Lezhi Tan, 2025. "Approximate Least-Favorable Distributions and Nearly Optimal Tests via Stochastic Mirror Descent," Papers 2511.16925, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.16925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.16925
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.16925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.