IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.02367.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Top OECD performers in green growth -- an FOI model analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zoltan Bartha

Abstract

With rising concerns about climate change, the issue of green growth have been growing in importance. The aim of this study is to establish a measurement method for green growth, and to identify the best performing countries in this field. The Future, Outside, and Inside (FOI) development model was used to measure the performance of the 38 OECD countries. Based on their 2019-20 scores, the countries that are top performers in green growth are the members of the so called Welfare-participatory cluster (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Isra-el, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden), and two outliers (Iceland, and Luxembourg).

Suggested Citation

  • Zoltan Bartha, 2025. "Top OECD performers in green growth -- an FOI model analysis," Papers 2510.02367, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.02367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.02367
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Zhiyang & Boussemart, Jean-Philippe & Leleu, Hervé, 2017. "Aggregate green productivity growth in OECD’s countries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 30-39.
    2. Seyithan Ahmet Ates & Kursad Derinkuyu, 2021. "Green growth and OECD countries: measurement of country performances through distance-based analysis (DBA)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15062-15073, October.
    3. Wang, Yun & Sun, Xiaohua & Guo, Xu, 2019. "Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 611-619.
    4. Beata Gavurova & Silvia Megyesiova & Matej Hudak, 2021. "Green Growth in the OECD Countries: A Multivariate Analytical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Zoltán Bartha & Andrea S. Gubik, 2014. "Characteristics Of The Large Corporation-Based, Bureaucratic Model Among Oecd Countries – An Foi Model Analysis," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Zhiyang & Zhao, Yuntian & Guneri, Fatma & Yang, Yiping & Wang, Songkai & Deng, Haiyan, 2023. "Does the rise of China promote the sustainable development of OECD countries? A geopolitical perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    2. Zhou, Dequn & Dong, Zhuojia & Sang, Xiuzhi & Wang, Qunwei & Yu, Xianyu, 2023. "Do feed-in tariff reduction and green certificate trading effectively promote regional sustainable development？," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Bai, Ge & Shen, Zhiyang & Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė, Kristina & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Li, Tianxiang, 2024. "Energy structure and green productivity dynamics: Investigation from OECD Countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Zhao, Jun & Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Kyriakou, Ioannis, 2022. "Is green growth affected by financial risks? New global evidence from asymmetric and heterogeneous analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Radek Doskocil, 2022. "The Multicriteria Assessment of the Green Growth in the Context of the European Union’s Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 739-739, August.
    6. Bogdzinski, Heidi & Sergio, Ivan & Wedemeier, Jan, 2025. "Unveiling the impact of green energy on green productivity: A focus on hydrogen and the green transition in European regions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1064-1082.
    7. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    9. Liu, Menghe & Li, Yuxiao, 2022. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    10. Wang, Huaxing & Li, Tianzi & Zhu, Junfan & Jian, Youting & Wang, Zeyu & Wang, Zengwen, 2023. "China's new environmental protection law: Implications for mineral resource policy, environmental precaution and green finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    11. Arnaud Abad & Michell Arias & Paola Ravelojaona, 2023. "Environmental Productivity Assessment: an Illustration with the Ecuadorian Oil Industry," Post-Print hal-03574542, HAL.
    12. Haochang Yang & Faming Zhang & Yixin He, 2021. "Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16119-16144, November.
    13. Zoltan Bartha, 2025. "Same old story: Hungary's development over the 2000-2020 period," Papers 2510.02366, arXiv.org.
    14. Chendi Li & Lei Wang & Yang Liu, 2023. "The Impact Factors and Spatial Spillover of Industrial Green Development: Based on Cities in the Northwest Segment of the Silk Road Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    16. Daniele, Federica & Pasquini, Alessandra & Clò, Stefano & Maltese, Enza, 2023. "Unburdening regulation: The impact of regulatory simplification on photovoltaic adoption in Italy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Sheng-Wei Lin & Wen-Min Lu, 2024. "A chance-constrained network DEA approach based on enhanced Russell-based directional distance measure to evaluate public sector performance: a case study of OECD countries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1837-1864, November.
    18. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Qin, Shuai & Li, Yaya, 2022. "Does industrial robot application promote green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Pastor, Jesus T. & Lovell, C.A. Knox & Aparicio, Juan, 2020. "Defining a new graph inefficiency measure for the proportional directional distance function and introducing a new Malmquist productivity index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(1), pages 222-230.
    20. Dejun Zhou & Abednego Osei & Andrew Osei Agyemang, 2025. "Addressing International Sustainable Economic Recovery in Developing Economies: The Roles of Natural Resources Market, Institutional Quality and Environmental Regulations," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12421-12450, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.02367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.