IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.15268.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beating the Correlation Breakdown: Robust Inference, Flexible Scenarios, and Stress Testing for Financial Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • JD Opdyke

Abstract

We live in a multivariate world, and effective modeling of financial portfolios, including their construction, allocation, forecasting, and risk analysis, simply is not possible without explicitly modeling the dependence structure of their assets. Dependence structure can drive portfolio results more than the combined effects of other parameters in investment and risk models, but the literature provides relatively little to define the finite-sample distributions of dependence measures in useable and useful ways under challenging, real-world financial data conditions. Yet this is exactly what is needed to make valid inferences about their estimates, and to use these inferences for essential purposes such as hypothesis testing, dynamic monitoring, realistic and granular scenario and reverse scenario analyses, and mitigating the effects of correlation breakdowns during market upheavals. This work develops a new and straightforward method, Nonparametric Angles-based Correlation (NAbC), for defining the finite-sample distributions of any dependence measure whose matrix of pairwise associations is positive definite (e.g. Pearsons, Kendalls, Spearmans, Tail Dependence Matrix, and others). The solution remains valid under marginal asset distributions characterized by notably different and varying degrees of serial correlation, non-stationarity, heavy-tailedness, and asymmetry. Importantly, NAbCs p-values and confidence intervals remain analytically consistent at both the matrix level and the pairwise cell level. Finally, NAbC maintains validity even when selected cells in the matrix are frozen for a given scenario or stress test, thus enabling flexible, granular, and realistic scenarios. NAbC stands alone in providing all of these capabilities simultaneously, and should prove to be a very useful means by which we can better understand and manage financial portfolios in our multivariate world.

Suggested Citation

  • JD Opdyke, 2025. "Beating the Correlation Breakdown: Robust Inference, Flexible Scenarios, and Stress Testing for Financial Portfolios," Papers 2504.15268, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.15268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.15268
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewandowski, Daniel & Kurowicka, Dorota & Joe, Harry, 2009. "Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1989-2001, October.
    2. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2017. "Nonlinear Shrinkage of the Covariance Matrix for Portfolio Selection: Markowitz Meets Goldilocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(12), pages 4349-4388.
    3. Christian Bongiorno & Damien Challet, 2024. "Covariance matrix filtering and portfolio optimisation: the average oracle vs non-linear shrinkage and all the variants of DCC-NLS," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1227-1234, September.
    4. Edwin van den Heuvel & Zhuozhao Zhan, 2022. "Myths About Linear and Monotonic Associations: Pearson’s r, Spearman’s ρ, and Kendall’s τ," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(1), pages 44-52, January.
    5. Junker, Robert R. & Griessenberger, Florian & Trutschnig, Wolfgang, 2021. "Estimating scale-invariant directed dependence of bivariate distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Zdzislaw Burda & Andrzej Jarosz, 2021. "Cleaning large-dimensional covariance matrices for correlated samples," Papers 2107.01352, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    7. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer, 2018. "“Generalized Measures of Correlation for Asymmetry, Nonlinearity, and Beyond”: Comment," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2018-23, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    8. Gernot Akemann & Jonit Fischmann & Pierpaolo Vivo, 2009. "Universal Correlations and Power-Law Tails in Financial Covariance Matrices," Papers 0906.5249, arXiv.org.
    9. Weiming Li & Jianfeng Yao, 2018. "On structure testing for component covariance matrices of a high dimensional mixture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(2), pages 293-318, March.
    10. Andréas Heinen & Alfonso Valdesogo, 2022. "The Kendall and Spearman rank correlations of the bivariate skew normal distribution," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1669-1698, December.
    11. Ji-Eun Choi & Dong Wan Shin, 2021. "A self-normalization break test for correlation matrix," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2333-2353, October.
    12. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    13. Gautier Marti, 2019. "CorrGAN: Sampling Realistic Financial Correlation Matrices Using Generative Adversarial Networks," Papers 1910.09504, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    14. Madar, Vered, 2015. "Direct formulation to Cholesky decomposition of a general nonsingular correlation matrix," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-147.
    15. Niu, Lu & Liu, Xiumin & Zhao, Junlong, 2020. "Robust estimator of the correlation matrix with sparse Kronecker structure for a high-dimensional matrix-variate," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Siburg, Karl Friedrich & Strothmann, Christopher & Weiß, Gregor, 2024. "Comparing and quantifying tail dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 95-103.
    17. Packham, N. & Woebbeking, F., 2023. "Correlation scenarios and correlation stress testing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 55-67.
    18. Yan Zhang & Jiyuan Tao & Zhixiang Yin & Guoqiang Wang, 2022. "Improved Large Covariance Matrix Estimation Based on Efficient Convex Combination and Its Application in Portfolio Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Robert F. Engle & Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2019. "Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 363-375, April.
    20. Zdzisław Burda & Andrzej Jarosz & Maciej Nowak & Jerzy Jurkiewicz & Gabor Papp & Ismail Zahed, 2011. "Applying free random variables to random matrix analysis of financial data. Part I: The Gaussian case," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 1103-1124.
    21. Saxena, Shobhit & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2023. "Separation-based parameterization strategies for estimation of restricted covariance matrices in multivariate model systems," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    22. Christian Bongiorno & Damien Challet & Grégoire Loeper, 2023. "Filtering time-dependent covariance matrices using time-independent eigenvalues," Post-Print hal-03481441, HAL.
    23. Jondeau, Eric, 2016. "Asymmetry in tail dependence in equity portfolios," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 351-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-David Fermanian & Benjamin Poignard & Panos Xidonas, 2025. "Model-based vs. agnostic methods for the prediction of time-varying covariance matrices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 511-548, March.
    2. Saminger-Platz Susanne & Kolesárová Anna & Šeliga Adam & Mesiar Radko & Klement Erich Peter, 2024. "On comprehensive families of copulas involving the three basic copulas and transformations thereof," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-36.
    3. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    4. Carlos Trucíos & João H. G. Mazzeu & Marc Hallin & Luiz K. Hotta & Pedro L. Valls Pereira & Mauricio Zevallos, 2022. "Forecasting Conditional Covariance Matrices in High-Dimensional Time Series: A General Dynamic Factor Approach," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 40-52, December.
    5. Yusuke Uchiyama & Kei Nakagawa, 2020. "TPLVM: Portfolio Construction by Student’s t -Process Latent Variable Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    6. Paolella, Marc S. & Polak, Paweł & Walker, Patrick S., 2021. "A non-elliptical orthogonal GARCH model for portfolio selection under transaction costs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Firoozye, Nikan & Tan, Vincent & Zohren, Stefan, 2023. "Canonical portfolios: Optimal asset and signal combination," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Yan Zhang & Jiyuan Tao & Zhixiang Yin & Guoqiang Wang, 2022. "Improved Large Covariance Matrix Estimation Based on Efficient Convex Combination and Its Application in Portfolio Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Gianluca De Nard & Robert F. Engle & Bryan Kelly, 2024. "Factor-Mimicking Portfolios for Climate Risk," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(3), pages 37-58, July.
    10. Trucíos, Carlos & Hotta, Luiz K. & Valls Pereira, Pedro L., 2019. "On the robustness of the principal volatility components," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 201-219.
    11. Vincent Tan & Stefan Zohren, 2020. "Estimation of Large Financial Covariances: A Cross-Validation Approach," Papers 2012.05757, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    12. Gianluca De Nard & Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2018. "Factor models for portfolio selection in large dimensions: the good, the better and the ugly," ECON - Working Papers 290, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Dec 2018.
    13. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2017. "Numerical implementation of the QuEST function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 199-223.
    14. Liu, Cheng & Wang, Moming & Xia, Ningning, 2022. "Design-free estimation of integrated covariance matrices for high-frequency data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Chen, Jia & Li, Degui & Linton, Oliver, 2019. "A new semiparametric estimation approach for large dynamic covariance matrices with multiple conditioning variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 155-176.
    16. Lam, Clifford, 2020. "High-dimensional covariance matrix estimation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101667, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Hafner, Christian M. & Wang, Linqi, 2024. "Dynamic portfolio selection with sector-specific regularization," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 17-33.
    18. Christian Bongiorno & Damien Challet, 2024. "Covariance matrix filtering and portfolio optimisation: the average oracle vs non-linear shrinkage and all the variants of DCC-NLS," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1227-1234, September.
    19. Morana, Claudio, 2019. "Regularized semiparametric estimation of high dimensional dynamic conditional covariance matrices," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 42-65.
    20. Emilija Dzuverovic & Matteo Barigozzi, 2023. "Hierarchical DCC-HEAVY Model for High-Dimensional Covariance Matrices," Papers 2305.08488, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.15268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.