IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/apk/nottec/2204.html

Counterfactual: Free Zone Participation in Costa Rican Economic Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Huertas-Morales

    (CINDE)

  • Kerry Loaiza-Marín

    (Department of Economic Research, Central Bank of Costa Rica)

  • Laura Ortiz-Coto

    (CINDE)

Abstract

We do a computation about the impact of the Free Zone in Costa Rica. We sum the transactions amount due to firms linked to this regime conditioning on the differences for buys and sells between local firms and multinationals (MNCs). Also, we compute and add indirect effects. We use the evidence from Alfaro-Ureña, Manelici y Vásquez (2019) about productivity improvements of local suppliers to MNCs and the evidence from Huertas-Morales, Loaiza-Marín y Ortiz-Coto (2021) about higher linkages of MNCs relative to local firms. This information allow us to compute the counterfactual about how transaction amounts would diminished in Costa Rica without the firms producing in the Free Zone. We compare our results with the “Balance de Zonas Francas” published by Procomer. In general, that Balance states that the importance of the Free Zone in Costa Rica is 6.7% of GDP in 2016, while our proposed computation measures 8.18% of GDP for the same year. ***Resumen: El ejercicio que se presenta en este documento tiene por objetivo brindar una aproximación de la participación de la Zona Franca dentro de la actividad económica en Costa Rica. Para ello, se contabiliza el monto de las transacciones efectuadas por empresas vinculadas a este régimen, condicional en las diferencias en compras y ventas entre firmas locales y multinacionales. Además, se computan y añaden sus efectos indirectos. Se utiliza la evidencia de Alfaro-Ureña, Manelici y Vásquez (2019) sobre mejoras en productividad de los proveedores locales al vender a multinacionales y la evidencia de Huertas-Morales, Loaiza-Marín y Ortiz-Coto (2021) sobre mayores encadenamientos de firmas multinacionales relativo a firmas locales. Esta información permite el cómputo del contrafactual que simula cómo disminuirían las transacciones en Costa Rica sin las empresas que operan bajo el régimen de Zona Franca. Los resultados de este ejercicio se comparan con los que brinda el Balance de Zonas Francas publicado por Procomer. En general, dicho balance indica que la importancia de la Zona Franca en Costa Rica representa un 6,7% del PIB en 2016, mientras el cálculo propuesto acá señala que dicha participación es de 8,18% del PIB para el mismo año.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Huertas-Morales & Kerry Loaiza-Marín & Laura Ortiz-Coto, 2022. "Counterfactual: Free Zone Participation in Costa Rican Economic Activity," Notas Técnicas 2204, Banco Central de Costa Rica.
  • Handle: RePEc:apk:nottec:2204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorioinvestigaciones.bccr.fi.cr/handle/20.500.12506/371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2019. "Conclusion: a fine balance," Chapters, in: Local Accountability and National Coordination in Fiscal Federalism, chapter 9, pages 190-194, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. De, Parikshit & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2019. "Balanced implementability of sequencing rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 342-353.
    3. Laura Alfaro, 2017. "Gains from Foreign Direct Investment: Macro and Micro Approaches," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(Supplemen), pages 2-15.
    4. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana, 2011. "Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: Why results vary and what the true effect is," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 234-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Volpe-Martincus & Kerry Loaiza-Marín & Sandro Zolezzi-Hernández & Keyssi Calderón-Medina, 2024. "How does investment and trade facilitation affect foreign affiliates performance: Firm-level evidence," Documentos de Trabajo 2401, Banco Central de Costa Rica.
    2. Jordaan, Jacob A., Douw, Willem, Qiang, Zhenwei, 2020. "Multinational Corporation Affiliates, Backward Linkages, and Productivity Spillovers in Developing and Emerging Economies : Evidence and Policy Making," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9364, The World Bank.
    3. Alonso Alfaro-Ureña & Isabela Manelici & Jose P Vasquez, 2022. "The Effects of Joining Multinational Supply Chains: New Evidence from Firm-to-Firm Linkages," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(3), pages 1495-1552.
    4. Lejárraga,Iza & Ragoussis,Alexandros, 2018. "Beyond Capital : Monitoring Development Outcomes of Multinational Enterprises," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8686, The World Bank.
    5. Yan Liu & Xuan Wang, 2023. "The impact of foreign direct investment on innovation at domestic firms: Evidence from the deregulation of foreign investment in China," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 676-718, May.
    6. Duan, Yunlong & Liu, Shuling & Cheng, Hao & Chin, Tachia & Luo, Xuan, 2021. "The moderating effect of absorptive capacity on transnational knowledge spillover and the innovation quality of high-tech industries in host countries: Evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Isaksson, Olov H.D. & Simeth, Markus & Seifert, Ralf W., 2016. "Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 699-706.
    8. Fidrmuc, Jarko & Lind, Ronja, 2020. "Macroeconomic impact of Basel III: Evidence from a meta-analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Andrés Barge‐Gil & Alberto López & Ramón Núñez‐Sánchez, 2020. "Technological spillovers from multinational firms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3184-3202, December.
    10. Daniel Münich & Martin Srholec & Michael Moritz & Johannes Schäffler, 2014. "Mothers and Daughters: Heterogeneity of German Direct Investments in the Czech Republic," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 42-62.
    11. Amendolagine, Vito & Prota, Francesco, 2021. "Bilateral investment treaties and backward linkages in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 172-185.
    12. Stefan Pahl & Marcel P. Timmer, 2020. "Do Global Value Chains Enhance Economic Upgrading? A Long View," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 1683-1705, July.
    13. Konstantin M. Wacker & Bruno Casella & Maria Borga, 2025. "Measuring multinational production with foreign direct investment statistics: A survey of challenges and recent developments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 1462-1487, September.
    14. Dutta, Sourish, 2017. "Research Methods of Assessing Global Value Chains," MPRA Paper 106201, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Marek Rusnak & Tomas Havranek & Roman Horvath, 2013. "How to Solve the Price Puzzle? A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(1), pages 37-70, February.
    16. Olivier N. Godart & Holger Görg, 2016. "Suppliers of multinationals and the forced linkage effect: Evidence from firm level data," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT, chapter 15, pages 277-288, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    17. Nikolaos Terzidis & Steven Brakman & Raquel Ortega-Argiles, 2019. "Labour Markets, Trade and Technological Progress. A Meta-Study," CESifo Working Paper Series 7719, CESifo.
    18. Sebastian Gechert & Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova & Dominika Kolcunova, 2022. "Measuring Capital-Labor Substitution: The Importance of Method Choices and Publication Bias," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 55-82, July.
    19. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Bartosz Kabaciński & Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Jacek Piotr Mizerka & Andreas Rathgeber & Agnieszka Stróżyńska-Szajek & Mikołaj Nowicki, 2024. "Real Earnings Management and Quality of Corporate Governance: A Meta-Regression Analysis," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 1-29.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apk:nottec:2204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Departamento de Investigación Económica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bccrrcr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.