IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2013018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving horizontal logistic co-operation through different concessions

Author

Listed:
  • VANOVERMEIRE, Christine
  • CARLIER, Lukas
  • SÖRENSEN, Kenneth

Abstract

Purpose: When collaborating, partners inevitably suffer changes in the way of working, costs or service aspects. However, some changes are easier to implement than others, and can be (easily) compensated by the positive effects of collaboration. This paper aims to give an overview of the concessions that early collaborators in Belgium have made or are willing to make in order for the collaboration to succeed. Design/methodology/approach: In-depth interviews with six managers of forwarding companies in Belgium have been conducted. Five of these managers are already involved in logistics collaboration projects, a sixth does not believe in horizontal collaboration. Findings: Our research shows that companies are not unwilling to execute changes when entering a logistics collaboration project. Cost increases are the most difficult to accept, while changes in the organization of processes and the supply chain are often the preferred kind of concession. Service level aspects can also be changed, however, which kind of aspects is highly dependent on the characteristics of the partner. Moreover, negative impact on one aspect of the service has to be compensated by an improvement in service level on another aspect. Originality/value: This research offers new case studies regarding horizontal logistics collaboration projects. The focus of this research is –in contrast to the main literature focusing on the adoption and start of horizontal cooperation– the actual execution phase. The insights of this research can act as a guideline when discussing the execution of horizontal logistics cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & CARLIER, Lukas & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Improving horizontal logistic co-operation through different concessions," Working Papers 2013018, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2013018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/9cf600/35f00d0a.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2006. "Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 585-599, October.
    2. Frisk, M. & Göthe-Lundgren, M. & Jörnsten, K. & Rönnqvist, M., 2010. "Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 448-458, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    2. Naber, S.K. & de Ree, D.A. & Spliet, R. & van den Heuvel, W., 2015. "Allocating CO2 emission to customers on a distribution route," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 191-199.
    3. Padilla Tinoco, Silvia Valeria & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2017. "Collaborative shipping under different cost-sharing agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 827-837.
    4. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2015. "Operations research models for coalition structure in collaborative logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 147-159.
    5. David Opresnik & Maurizio Fiasché & Marco Taisch & Manuel Hirsch, 0. "An evolving fuzzy inference system for extraction of rule set for planning a product–service strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    6. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Cruijssen, Frans, 2012. "Co³ Position Paper: Framework For Collaboration," Other publications TiSEM 9f66d856-f0ff-455f-a334-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Zehetner, Dominik & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "The collaborative batching problem in multi-site additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    9. Anibal Sanjab & H'el`ene Le Cadre & Yuting Mou, 2021. "TSO-DSOs Stable Cost Allocation for the Joint Procurement of Flexibility: A Cooperative Game Approach," Papers 2111.12830, arXiv.org.
    10. Haiyun, Cui & Zhixiong, Huang & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VAN BREEDAM, Alex & VANNIEUWENHUYSE, Bart & VERSTREPEN, Sven, 2012. "Efficient supply chains through flexible horizontal collaboration," Working Papers 2012007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    12. Jessica Rodríguez‐Pereira & Burcu Balcik & Marie‐Ève Rancourt & Gilbert Laporte, 2021. "A Cost‐Sharing Mechanism for Multi‐Country Partnerships in Disaster Preparedness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4541-4565, December.
    13. Eren Akyol, Derya & De Koster, René B.M., 2018. "Determining time windows in urban freight transport: A city cooperative approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-50.
    14. Peter, Brian & Niquidet, Kurt, 2016. "Estimates of residual fibre supply and the impacts of new bioenergy capacity from a forest sector transportation model of the Canadian Prairie Provinces," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 62-72.
    15. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Serkan Alacam & Asli Sencer, 2021. "Using Blockchain Technology to Foster Collaboration among Shippers and Carriers in the Trucking Industry: A Design Science Research Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    17. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Measuring and rewarding flexibility in collaborative distribution, including two-partner coalitions," Working Papers 2013017, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    18. Peyman Borna & Mohammad Ali Beheshtinia, 2022. "Enhancing the quality of municipality services using four-dimensional house of quality," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3849-3870, October.
    19. Bhoopalam, Anirudh Kishore & Agatz, Niels & Zuidwijk, Rob, 2018. "Planning of truck platoons: A literature review and directions for future research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 212-228.
    20. Nicklas Forsell & Ljusk Eriksson, 2014. "Influence of temporal aggregation on strategic forest management under risk of wind damage," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 397-414, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2013018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.