IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/anf/wpaper/28.html

Reinventing India's procurement laws: a global perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Diya Uday

    (xKDR Forum)

Abstract

A unified law is viewed as a panacea for the current challenges in public procurement in India. In 2012, the Indian government attempted to create a statutory framework for public procurement by introducing Public Procurement Bill 2012. This Bill did not become a law and public procurement in India continues to be governed by a set of executive instructions. The central question remains: What should India's legal framework for public procurement be? This papers explores this question through a comparative analysis of the similarities and dierences in procurement laws in four jurisdictions, including India. The objective is to identify fundamental rules that underpin well-designed procurement frameworks that will guide India's eorts to create a robust law for public procurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Diya Uday, 2023. "Reinventing India's procurement laws: a global perspective," Working Papers 28, xKDR.
    • Handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.xkdr.org/papers/Uday2023_reinventingIndiasProcurementLawsAGlobalPerspective.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erica Bosio & Simeon Djankov & Edward Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Public Procurement in Law and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1117, April.
    2. Yugank Goyal, 2022. "Public procurement during the pandemic: experience of India and China," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 222-241, May.
    3. Bhabesh Hazarika & Pratap Ranjan Jena, 2017. "Public Procurement in India: Assessment of Institutional Mechanism, Challenges, and Reforms," Working Papers id:12004, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Djankov, Simeon & Su, Meng, 2024. "Are U.S. sanctions off-target: Evidence from the Magnitsky act," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Auktor, Georgeta Vidican & Altenburg, Tilman & Stamm, Andreas, 2020. "The transition towards a green economy and its implications for quality infrastructure," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 102, number 102, January.
    3. Sergey Tsygankov & Vadim Syropyatov & Vyacheslav Volchik, 2021. "Institutional Governance of Innovations: Novel Insights of Leadership in Russian Public Procurement," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Antonio Estache & Renaud Foucart & Tomas Serebrisky, 2022. "When can lotteries improve public procurement processes?," Working Papers 359001116, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    5. Martinez-Carrasco, José & ConceiçaÞo, Otavio & Dezolt, Ana Lúcia, 2023. "More Information, Lower Price? Access Market-based Reference Prices and Gains in Public Procurement Efficiency," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12754, Inter-American Development Bank.
    6. Emery, Thomas & Mélon, Lela & Spruk, Rok, 2023. "Does e-procurement matter for economic growth? Subnational evidence from Australia," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 318-334.
    7. Stjepan Srhoj & Melko Dragojević, 2024. "Public Procurement and Supplier Job Creation: Insights from Auctions," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 470-527.
    8. Lambsdorff, Johann Graf & Grubiak, Kevin & Werner, Katharina, 2023. "Intrinsic Motivation vs. Corruption? Experimental Evidence on the Performance of Officials," MPRA Paper 118153, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Annalisa Frigo & Sauro Mocetti, 2025. "The effects of digitalization on the functioning of the public sector: evidence from e-procurement," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 938, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    10. Nadia Fiorino & Emma Galli & Ilde Rizzo & Marco Valente, 2023. "Public procurement and reputation. An agent‐based model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 806-832, November.
    11. Antonio Estache & Renaud Foucart & Konstantinos Georgalos, 2024. "Preference for Control vs. Random Dictatorship," Working Papers 413554011, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    12. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/6jahov5tde8vt9aplqrgg3trl4 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mulabdic, Alen & Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2022. "Trade barriers in government procurement," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Brugués, Felipe & Brugués, Javier & Giambra, Samuele, 2024. "Political connections and misallocation of procurement contracts: Evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Mahmalat,Mounir & Maktabi,Wassim, 2022. "Cartels in Infrastructure Procurement — Evidence from Lebanon," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10226, The World Bank.
    16. Tukiainen, Janne & Blesse, Sebastian & Bohne, Albrecht & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Jääskeläinen, Jan & Luukinen, Ari & Sieppi, Antti, 2024. "What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    17. Cingano, Federico & Palomba, Filippo & Pinotti, Paolo & Rettore, Enrico, 2022. "Making Subsidies Work: Rules vs. Discretion," CEPR Discussion Papers 17004, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Arozamena, Leandro & Ganuza, Juan-José & Weinschelbaum, Federico, 2023. "Renegotiation, discrimination and favoritism in symmetric procurement auctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Jonas Hjort & Vinayak Iyer & Golvine de Rochambeau, 2020. "Informational Barriers to Market Access: Experimental Evidence from Liberian Firms," Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers hal-03389180, HAL.
    20. Olga Chiappinelli & Ambrogio Dalò & Leonardo M. Giuffrida, 2024. "The greener, the better? Evidence from government contractors," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2024/474, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    21. Antonio Estache & Renaud Foucart & Tomas Serebrisky, 2024. "Can Lotteries help fix Procurement Failures? A Review of Theory and Evidence," Working Papers ECARES 2024-18, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:anf:wpaper:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ami Dagli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.papers.xkdr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.