IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/430.html

Recommendation Design, Pricing, and Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Laurenz Marstaller

    (University of Bonn)

Abstract

This paper studies how platforms jointly choose fees and recommendations and their implications for fee regulation. A platform charges sellers a commission rate and ranks products based on price and match-value. The analysis shows that price-sensitive rankings intensify seller competition, allowing the platform to extract more surplus. Commission-rate caps constrain fees, but platforms may respond by making recommendations less price-sensitive, attenuating consumersurplus gains. By contrast, capped nominal fees can be more effective because they shift the platform’s incentives toward transaction volume rather than transaction value. Effective fee regulation must therefore account for how platforms adjust their recommendation policies in response.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurenz Marstaller, 2026. "Recommendation Design, Pricing, and Regulation," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 430, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_430_2026.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon P. Anderson & Regis Renault, 1999. "Pricing, Product Diversity, and Search Costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond Model," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 30(4), pages 719-735, Winter.
    2. Paul Heidhues & Mats Köster & Botond Kőszegi, 2023. "Steering Fallible Consumers," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(652), pages 1430-1465.
    3. Karle, Heiko & Preuss, Marcel & Reisinger, Markus, 2026. "Selling on Recommender Platforms: Demand Boost versus Customer Migration," CEPR Discussion Papers 21117, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Renato Gomes & Andrea Mantovani, 2025. "Regulating Platform Fees under Price Parity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 190-235.
    5. Chengsi Wang & Julian Wright, 2025. "Regulating Platform Fees," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 746-783.
    6. Andrei Hagiu & Tat‐How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 53(2), pages 297-327, June.
    7. Martin Peitz & Anton Sobolev, 2026. "Inflated Recommendations," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 57(2), pages 368-385, June.
    8. Mark Armstrong, 2006. "Competition in two‐sided markets," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 668-691, September.
    9. Andrei Hagiu & Bruno Jullien, 2011. "Why do intermediaries divert search?," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(2), pages 337-362, June.
    10. Volker Nocke & Patrick Rey, 2024. "Consumer Search, Steering, and Choice Overload," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(5), pages 1684-1739.
    11. Jean‐Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2006. "Two‐sided markets: a progress report," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 645-667, September.
    12. Alexandre de Cornière & Greg Taylor, 2019. "A model of biased intermediation," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(4), pages 854-882, December.
    13. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2011. "Targeting in advertising markets: implications for offline versus online media," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 42(3), pages 417-443, September.
    14. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    15. Robin Ng, 2025. "Competition Through Recommendations," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_718, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    16. Michael Dinerstein & Liran Einav & Jonathan Levin & Neel Sundaresan, 2018. "Consumer Price Search and Platform Design in Internet Commerce," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1820-1859, July.
    17. Tat-How Teh & Julian Wright, 2022. "Intermediation and Steering: Competition in Prices and Commissions," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 281-321, May.
    18. Asher Wolinsky, 1986. "True Monopolistic Competition as a Result of Imperfect Information," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 101(3), pages 493-511.
    19. Kfir Eliaz & Ran Spiegler, 2016. "Search Design and Broad Matching," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(3), pages 563-586, March.
    20. Roman Inderst & Marco Ottaviani, 2012. "Competition through Commissions and Kickbacks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(2), pages 780-809, April.
    21. Oz Shy & Zhu Wang, 2011. "Why Do Payment Card Networks Charge Proportional Fees?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1575-1590, June.
    22. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2024. "Optimal Discoverability on Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7770-7790, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Peitz, 2025. "Governance and Regulation of Platforms," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, edition 0, chapter 23, pages 565-593, Springer.
    2. Yangguang Huang, 2021. "Search Algorithm and Sales on Online Platforms: Evidence from Food Delivery Platforms," HKUST CEP Working Papers Series 202101, HKUST Center for Economic Policy.
    3. Xiaoming Cai & Pieter Gautier & Ronald Wolthoff, 2026. "Platform-Controlled Search and Distortions in Attention Allocation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-035/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Teh, Christopher & Wang, Chengsi & Watanabe, Makoto, 2024. "Strategic limitation of market accessibility: Search platform design and welfare," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Dirk Bergemann & Alessandro Bonatti, 2024. "Data, Competition, and Digital Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(8), pages 2553-2595, August.
    6. Zemin (Zachary) Zhong, 2023. "Platform Search Design: The Roles of Precision and Price," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 293-313, March.
    7. Huang, Yangguang & Xie, Yu, 2023. "Search algorithm, repetitive information, and sales on online platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Muxin Li, 2023. "Do Lower Search Costs Benefit Intermediaries?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 63(3), pages 373-405, November.
    9. Cai, Xiaoming & Gautier, Pieter & Wolthoff, Ronald, 2026. "Platform-Controlled Search and Distortions in Attention Allocation," IZA Discussion Papers 18745, IZA Network @ LISER.
    10. Jürgen Rösch, 2024. "Market entry as a marketplace owner: when and why should you sell on your marketplace?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 525-541, April.
    11. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    12. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Xuying Zhao, 2024. "Content Length Limit: How Does It Matter for a Consumer-to-Consumer Media Platform?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1785-1801, December.
    13. Martin Peitz, 2024. "The Economic Theory of Two-Sided Platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_584, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    14. Calvano, Emilio & Polo, Michele, 2021. "Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Karle, Heiko & Preuss, Marcel & Reisinger, Markus, 2026. "Selling on Recommender Platforms: Demand Boost versus Customer Migration," CEPR Discussion Papers 21117, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Simon P. Anderson & Bruno Jullien, 2015. "The advertising-financed business model in two-sided media markets," Post-Print hal-02866192, HAL.
    17. Moraga-González, José-Luis & Motchenkova, Evgenia & Hoà ng, Long, 2026. "Pricing and Investment by a Two-Sided Monopoly Platform," CEPR Discussion Papers 21336, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Budzinski, Oliver & Stöhr, Annika, 2025. "Regulating recommender systems? Effects of data-based individualization (and its limits) on competition in the digital world," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 204, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    19. Banerjee, Shrabastee & Chakraborty, Ishita & Choi, Hana & Datta, Hannes & Daviet, Remi & Farronato, Chiara & Kim, Minkyung & Lambrecht, Anja & Manchanda, Puneet & Öry, Aniko & Sen, Ananya & Van Alstyn, 2026. "Digital platforms 2.0: Emerging topics, opportunities, and challenges," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 600-618.
    20. Alexandre de Cornière, 2016. "Search Advertising," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 156-188, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.