IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/usdami/410140.html

Factors Affecting the Adoption of Wind and Solar-Power Generating Systems on U.S. Farms: Experiences at the State Level

Author

Listed:
  • Xiarchos, Irene M.
  • Lazarus, William

Abstract

Excerpts from the Executive Summary: The study is the first to examine the role of State-level policies such as net metering and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), as well as the role of electric cooperatives, on States’ adoption rates of solar and wind systems on U.S. farms. The study found that States with higher energy prices, more organic acres per farm, and more Internet connectivity adopt renewable electricity at higher rates. For solar systems, full farm ownership and solar resources also have a significant and positive relationship with adoption rates. RPS targets are found to increase renewable electricity adoption at the State level. Our result accords with the literature; however, this is the first study to show an impact at the distributed-generation scale. Our study does not find a systematic relationship for State financial instruments, such as rebates, grants, investment tax credits, and production incentives, at least in the form captured by our policy variables. Similarly, net metering and interconnection policies do not seem to influence renewable electricity adoption at the State level. Conversely, electric cooperative prevalence in the State is found to have a negative relationship to renewable electricity adoption share. The interaction of those factors highlights the importance of coordinating approaches in policy formulation to meet Federal and State objectives of increasing renewable energy adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiarchos, Irene M. & Lazarus, William, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Wind and Solar-Power Generating Systems on U.S. Farms: Experiences at the State Level," USDA Miscellaneous 410140, United States Department of Agriculture.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:410140
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/410140/files/WindSolarFarmAdoption-2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.410140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willis, Ken & Scarpa, Riccardo & Gilroy, Rose & Hamza, Neveen, 2011. "Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: Heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6021-6029, October.
    2. Xiarchos, Irene M. & Vick, Brian, 2011. "Solar Energy Use in U.S. Agriculture – Overview and Policy Issues," USDA Miscellaneous 356481, United States Department of Agriculture.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Junjie & Yu, Shiwei & Hu, Yundie & Hu, Xing & Zhang, Wenqing, 2025. "Impact of China's renewable energy product exports on host countries' energy transition R&D: The role of population aging," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Li, Tingting & Lu, Hongwei & Li, Jinkai & Chen, Jueying & Hong, Yu & Liu, Heguang, 2025. "Population ageing and clean energy transition: Evidence from rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    3. Costantini, Valeria & Sforna, Giorgia, 2020. "A dynamic CGE model for jointly accounting ageing population, automation and environmental tax reform. European Union as a case study," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 280-306.
    4. Zoltán Szakály & Péter Balogh & Enikő Kontor & Zoltán Gabnai & Attila Bai, 2020. "Attitude toward and Awareness of Renewable Energy Sources: Hungarian Experience and Special Features," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Dendramis, Yiannis & Flamos, Alexandros, 2020. "Understanding technology ownership to reveal adoption trends for energy efficiency measures in the Greek residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Liang Wang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Sisi Que & Wei Yang, 2016. "Eliciting Drivers of Community Perceptions of Mining Projects through Effective Community Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Fadly, Dalia & Fontes, Francisco, 2019. "Geographical proximity and renewable energy diffusion: An empirical approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 422-435.
    8. Bao, Qifang & Sinitskaya, Ekaterina & Gomez, Kelley J. & MacDonald, Erin F. & Yang, Maria C., 2020. "A human-centered design approach to evaluating factors in residential solar PV adoption: A survey of homeowners in California and Massachusetts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 503-513.
    9. Lei, Mingyu & Cai, Wenjia & Liu, Wenling & Wang, Can, 2022. "The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Abrigo, Michael R.M. & Ortiz, Ma. Kristina P., 2024. "Residential electricity consumption over the demographic transition in the Philippines," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    11. Morita, Tamaki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2015. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for electricity after the Great East Japan Earthquake," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 82-105.
    12. Balcombe, Paul & Rigby, Dan & Azapagic, Adisa, 2013. "Motivations and barriers associated with adopting microgeneration energy technologies in the UK," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 655-666.
    13. Hancevic, Pedro I. & Nuñez, Hector M. & Rosellon, Juan, 2017. "Distributed photovoltaic power generation: Possibilities, benefits, and challenges for a widespread application in the Mexican residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 478-489.
    14. Hackbarth, André & Löbbe, Sabine, 2020. "Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Sara Ghaboulian Zare & Reza Hafezi & Mohammad Alipour & Reza Parsaei Tabar & Rodney A. Stewart, 2021. "Residential Solar Water Heater Adoption Behaviour: A Review of Economic and Technical Predictors and Their Correlation with the Adoption Decision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Jing Liang & Yueming Qiu & Poornima Padmanabhan, 2017. "Consumers’ Attitudes towards Surcharges on Distributed Renewable Energy Generation and Energy Efficiency Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Lang, Ghislaine & Lanz, Bruno, 2021. "Energy efficiency, information, and the acceptability of rent increases: A survey experiment with tenants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Ortega-Izquierdo, Margarita & Paredes-Salvador, Andrés & Montoya-Rasero, Carlos, 2019. "Analysis of the decision making factors for heating and cooling systems in Spanish households," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 175-185.
    19. Borchers, Allison M. & Xiarchos, Irene & Beckman, Jayson, 2014. "Determinants of wind and solar energy system adoption by U.S. farms: A multilevel modeling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-115.
    20. Van Opstal, Wim, 2025. "Too old for a circular solar economy? Age dynamics in the acceptance of solar and circular value propositions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usdami:410140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.usda.gov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.