IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13418.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Net Social Profitability And Domestic Resource Cost Of Eight Agricultural Commodities In Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Lokaphadhana, Tipaporn
  • Welsch, Delane E.

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to measure, among commodities and among agro-economic zones, the economic efficiency and the real cost of earning foreign exchange through producing and exporting eight selected commodities by using the concepts of social profitability and domestic resource cost. The eight selected commodities are namely: rice, sugar cane, maize, cassava root, kenaf, mung beans, ground nuts and soybeans. The interaction between economic efficiency and government intervention in the external trade of these commodities will also be examined. The period included in the study will be 1977/78, 1978/79, 1979/80 and 1980/81 crop years.

Suggested Citation

  • Lokaphadhana, Tipaporn & Welsch, Delane E., 1982. "Net Social Profitability And Domestic Resource Cost Of Eight Agricultural Commodities In Thailand," Staff Papers 13418, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13418
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13418/files/p82-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott R. Pearson & Ronald K. Meyer, 1974. "Comparative Advantage among African Coffee Producers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 56(2), pages 310-313.
    2. Siamwalla, Ammar, 1975. "A History of Rice Policies in Thailand," Food Research Institute Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18.
    3. Pearson, Scott R. & Akrasanee, Narongchai & Nelson, Gerald C., 1976. "Comparative Advantage in Rice Production: A Methodological Introduction," Food Research Institute Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12.
    4. Bruno, Michael, 1972. "Domestic Resource Costs and Effective Protection: Clarification and Synthesis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 80(1), pages 16-33, Jan.-Feb..
    5. Raveendra N. Batra, 1973. "Studies in the Pure Theory of International Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-01423-1, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten, Johann F. & Ohene-Anyang, E. & van Rooyen, Johan, 1998. "An Analysis Of The Comparative Advantage And Policy Incentives Of Commercial Wheat Production In South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(4), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Narongchai Akrasanee, 1980. "Trade Strategy for Employment Growth in Thailand," NBER Chapters, in: Trade and Employment in Developing Countries, Volume 1: Individual Studies, pages 393-434, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Agriculture and Trade Analysis Division, 1989. "Agricultural Policy, Trade, Economic Growth, And Development," Staff Reports 278196, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Wiebelt, Manfred & Herrmann, Roland & Schenck, Patricia & Thiele, Rainer, 1992. "Discrimination against agriculture in developing countries?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 458, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Carter, Colin A. & Zhong, Funing, 1990. "Will "Getting Prices Right" Enhance Chinese Agriculture?: A Test Of Regional Comparative Advantage," Working Papers 225853, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Tuan, Francis C. & Tingjun, Peng, 2001. "Structural Changes In China'S Livestock And Feed Production: Trade Implications," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14550, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Dawe, David, 2009. "Cereal Price Transmission in Several Large Asian Countries during the Global Food Crisis," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Choi, E. Kwan, 2008. "Factor growth and equalized factor prices," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 517-528, October.
    9. Dawe, D., 2002. "The changing structure of the world rice market, 1950-2000," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 355-370, August.
    10. Waqar Akhtar & Muhammad Sharif & Nadeem Akmal, 2007. "Analysis of Economic Efficiency and Competitiveness of the Rice Production Systems of Pakistan’s Punjab," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 141-153, Jan-Jun.
    11. Yano, Makoto, 2021. "Professor Ronald W. Jones and his influence on Asia Pacific economics," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Haeri, Ali & Arabmazar, Abbas, 2018. "Designing an Industrial Policy for Developing Countries: a New Approach," MPRA Paper 89048, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Stephen Devadoss & Wongun Song, 2003. "Factor Market Oligopsony and the Production Possibility Frontier," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 729-744, September.
    14. Cabanilla, Liborio S., 1983. "Economic Incentives and Comparative Advantage in the Livestock Industry," Working Papers WP 1983-07, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    15. Martínez Ruiz, Elena, 2003. "Autarkic policy and efficiency in the Spanish industrial sector. An estimate of domestic resource cost in 1958," Economic History Working Papers 22352, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    16. Chaudhuri, Sarbajit, 2014. "How can trade unionism affect welfare consequences of trade and investment reforms in a developing economy?," MPRA Paper 59063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Aurup Ratan Dhar & Ismat Ara Begum, 2018. "An Economic Perspective of the Export Potentiality of Aromatic Rice in Bangladesh," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 10(1), pages 22-30, July.
    18. Dunmore, John C., 0. "Competitiveness And Comparative Advantage Of U.S. Agriculture," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    19. Islam, Mohammad Ariful, 2016. "Comparative Advantage and Cost Efficiency of Rice-Producing Farms in Bangladesh: A Policy Analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 85-96.
    20. Vasilii Erokhin & Li Diao & Peiran Du, 2020. "Sustainability-Related Implications of Competitive Advantages in Agricultural Value Chains: Evidence from Central Asia—China Trade and Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.