IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersrr/56457.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EU Sugar Policy Regime and Implications of Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Elbehri, Aziz
  • Umstaetter, Johannes
  • Kelch, David R.

Abstract

The European Union’s sugar policy, in place since 1968, underwent its first major reform in 2005 in response to mounting and unsustainable imbalances in supply and demand. The reform, however, targeted only a few policy instruments (intervention price cut, voluntary production quota buyout, and restrictions on nonquota sugar exports), while leaving other key policies unchanged (interstate quota trading, sugar-substitute competition, and import barriers). Consequently, the extent of the reform’s impact is limited, compared with more far-reaching alternatives, particularly when the oligopolistic nature of the industry and its noncompetitive pricing behavior are taken into account. A model-based analysis suggests that the reforms by themselves are unlikely to induce price adjustments sufficient to reduce overproduction unless quotas and/or high tariffs are reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Elbehri, Aziz & Umstaetter, Johannes & Kelch, David R., 2008. "The EU Sugar Policy Regime and Implications of Reform," Economic Research Report 56457, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:56457
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.56457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/56457/files/Elbehri_EU%20sugar%20policy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.56457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    2. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    3. Chaplin, Hannah & Matthews, Alan, 2006. "Coping with the Fallout for Preference-receiving Countries from EU Sugar Reform," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17.
    4. Conforti, Piero & Rapsomanikis, George, 2006. "Preferences Erosion and Trade Costs in the Sugar Market: The Impact of the Everything but Arms Initiative and the Reform of the EU Policy," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25641, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Andino, Jose & Taylor, Richard D. & Koo, Won W., 2005. "Impact of the EU Sugar Policy Reform and the WTO-DDA on the U.S. Sugar Industry," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19334, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Ellen Huan-Niemi & Jyrki Niemi, 2003. "The impact of preferential, regional and multilateral trade agreements: a case study of the EU sugar regime," ENARPRI Working Papers 001, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    7. Huan-Niemi, Ellen & Niemi, Jyrki S., 2003. "The Impact of Preferential, Regional and Multilateral Trade Agreements: A Case Study of the EU Sugar Regime," ENARPRI Working Papers 25134, European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes (ENARPRI).
    8. Elobeid, Amani & Beghin, John C., 2005. "Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms in Sugar Markets (Revised)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12419, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nolte, Stephan & Grethe, Harald, 2012. "Der Markt für Zucker," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(Supplemen), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Taylor, Richard D., 2016. "2016 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2016-2025," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 242089, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 2011. "2011 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2010-2020," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 115555, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    4. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 2013. "013 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2012-202," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 157708, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 2012. "2012 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2011-2021," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 128037, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Marlen Haß, 2022. "Liberalising the EU sugar market: what are the effects on third countries?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(3), pages 638-667, July.
    7. Taylor, Richard D. & Koo, Won W., 2015. "2015 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2015-2024," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 201311, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    8. Tangermann, Stefan, 2012. "Preisanstieg am EU-Zuckermarkt: Bestimmungsgründe und Handlungsmöglichkeiten der Marktpolitik. Gutachten für den Milchindustrie-Verband e.V," DARE Discussion Papers 1203, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    9. Taylor, Richard D., 2017. "2017 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2016-2026," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 256036, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    10. Renwick, Alan W. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Philippidis, George & Bourne, Michael & Reader, Mark A. & Lang, Ben, 2012. "Sugar and Spice and all things nice? Assessing the Impact of the 2006 EU sugar regime reforms," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 134706, Agricultural Economics Society.
    11. Koo, Won W. & Taylor, Richard D., 2014. "2014 Outlook of the U.S. and World Sugar Markets, 2013-2023," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 187188, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Berkum, Siemen & Roza, Pim & van Tongeren, Frank W., 2005. "Impacts of the EU sugar policy reforms on developing countries," Report Series 29139, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    2. Kerkelä, Leena & Huan-Niemi, Ellen, 2005. "Trade Preferences in the EU Sugar Sector: Winners and Losers," Discussion Papers 358, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Zhai, Fan, 2006. "Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of "Hub and Spoke"," Conference papers 331509, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2008. "INDONESIA-E3: An Indonesian Applied General Equilibrium Model for Analyzing the Economy, Equity, and the Environment," Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) 200804, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University, revised Sep 2008.
    5. Marilyne Huchet‐Bourdon & Esmaeil Pishbahar, 2009. "Armington Elasticities and Tariff Regime: An Application to European Union Rice Imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 586-603, September.
    6. Michael Plummer & Frank Harrigan & Fan Zhai & Patrick Messerlin, 2006. "The Doha Development Agenda: Asian Challenges and Prospects after the Ministerial Meeting in Hong Kong, China," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/8132, Sciences Po.
    7. Carbone, Jared C. & Helm, Carsten & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2009. "The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 266-280, November.
    8. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2004. "Specification choice and robustness in CGE trade policy analysis with imperfect competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1065-1099, December.
    9. Michael Plummer & Frank Harrigan & Fan Zhai & Patrick Messerlin, 2006. "The Doha Development Agenda: Asian Challenges and Prospects after the Ministerial Meeting in Hong Kong, China," SciencePo Working papers hal-03462128, HAL.
    10. Axel Borrmann & Matthias Busse & Manuel De La Rocha, 2007. "Consequences of Economic Partnership Agreements between East and Southern African Countries and the EU for Inter- and Intra-regional Integration," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 233-253.
    11. Arjan Lejour & Paul Veenendaal & Gerard Verweij & Nico van Leeuwen, 2006. "Worldscan; a model for international economic policy analysis," CPB Document 111.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    12. Mario Holzner, 2004. "GSIM Measurement of the Costs of Protection in Southeast Europe," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 55, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    13. Kuo‐I CHANG & Kazunobu HAYAKAWA, 2010. "Border Barriers In Agricultural Trade And The Impact Of Their Elimination: Evidence From East Asia," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 48(2), pages 232-246, June.
    14. Kym Anderson & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2007. "Do Global Trade Distortions Still Harm Developing Country Farmers?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 143(1), pages 108-139, April.
    15. Dan Ciuriak, 2015. "The Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement: What it Means for Canada," e-briefs 202, C.D. Howe Institute.
    16. Bouët, Antoine, 2006. "What can the poor expect from trade liberalization?: opening the "black box" of trade modeling," MTID discussion papers 93, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    17. Hertel, Thomas, 2013. "Global Applied General Equilibrium Analysis Using the Global Trade Analysis Project Framework," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 815-876, Elsevier.
    18. Utai UPRASEN & Bernadette ANDREOSSO-O'CALLAGHAN, 2008. "Impact of the 5th EU Enlargement on ASEAN," EcoMod2008 23800145, EcoMod.
    19. Xiao-guang Zhang, 2006. "Armington Elasticities and Terms of Trade Effects in Global CGE Models," Staff Working Papers 0601, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    20. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:14:y:2007:i:1:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Helming, John & Tabeau, Andrzej & Kuhlman, Tom & van Tongeren, Frank, 2006. "Linkage of GTAP and DRAM for scenario assessment: methodology, application and some selected results," Conference papers 331500, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:56457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.