IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333070.html

The European Emission Trading System and renewable electricity: Using the GTAP Power Database to analyze the role of carbon prices on the development of renewables in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Soeder, Mareike
  • Thube, Sneha Dattatraya
  • Winkler, Malte

Abstract

About one half of European greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is regulated under the EU emissions trading system (ETS), the other half is not subject to carbon pricing. Under increasing carbon prices this may lead to intersectoral carbon leakage, as some GHG emissions are burdened with a price and others are not. Furthermore, increasing carbon prices may lead to international leakage effects, shifts in electricity production technologies (fossil fuel vs. renewable) and inter-European burden sharing of GHG abatement. Here we use the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model DART-CLIM to analyze these effects under a set of scenarios reflecting different degrees of flexibility on the production and/or the consumption side. While in most non-ETS sectors emissions (and, thus, intersectoral carbon leakage) are highest in a scenario of restricted growth of renewable electricity, emissions in direct fossil fuel consumption increase in a scenario with high substitutability in energy goods in final household consumption. This is because electricity prices increase and coal and gas prices decrease due to strong reductions in coal and gas based electricity production following high prices for emission allowances in the EU-ETS. International carbon leakage increases with a higher allowance price, with China showing especially high emissions under the assumption of reduced renewable installation. In the EU´s electricity sector coal decreases by 75% when an allowance price of 50€ is assumed. When renewables are thwarted, mainly gas and oil increase their electricity production to fill the gap left by coal and renewables, but overall electricity production decreases. Our results indicate that a strong development of renewable electricity production is desirable to restrict intersectoral and international carbon leakage. Measures for household GHG emissions should be taken to avoid increasing emissions in this sector when fossil fuel prices decrease due to higher allowance prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Soeder, Mareike & Thube, Sneha Dattatraya & Winkler, Malte, 2019. "The European Emission Trading System and renewable electricity: Using the GTAP Power Database to analyze the role of carbon prices on the development of renewables in the EU," Conference papers 333070, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333070/files/9304.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2016. "The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 129-148.
    2. Klepper, Gernot & Peterson, Sonja, 2006. "Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: The influence of world energy prices," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Springer, Katrin, 1998. "The DART general equilibrium model: A technical description," Kiel Working Papers 883, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    4. Eugénie Joltreau & Katrin Sommerfeld, 2019. "Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 453-471, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Xing & Xu, Jianze & Zhang, Fenglan & Ma, Pingping & Jin, Yi, 2025. "The logic of policies for energy price regulation in the future: A synergistic developmental perspective based on energy and carbon markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Clo' & Gianluca Iannucci & Alessandro Tampieri, 2024. "Emission permits and firms' environmental responsibility," Working Papers - Economics wp2024_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    2. Liu, Yinan & Lv, Peiyao & Zhao, Hao, 2024. "Green innovation through trade: The impact of European Union emissions trading scheme on Chinese exporters," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Abrell, Jan & Kosch, Mirjam & Rausch, Sebastian, 2022. "How effective is carbon pricing?—A machine learning approach to policy evaluation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Sadayuki, Taisuke & Arimura, Toshi H., 2021. "Do regional emission trading schemes lead to carbon leakage within firms? Evidence from Japan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. De Beule, Filip & Schoubben, Frederiek & Struyfs, Kristof, 2022. "The pollution haven effect and investment leakage: The case of the EU-ETS," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Vandyck, Toon & Weitzel, Matthias & Wojtowicz, Krzysztof & Rey Los Santos, Luis & Maftei, Anamaria & Riscado, Sara, 2021. "Climate policy design, competitiveness and income distribution: A macro-micro assessment for 11 EU countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Ruth Delzeit & Malte Winkler & Mareike Söder, 2018. "Land Use Change under Biofuel Policies and a Tax on Meat and Dairy Products: Considering Complexity in Agricultural Production Chains Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "DART-BIO: A technical description," Kiel Working Papers 2195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    9. Böning, Justus & Di Nino, Virginia & Folger, Till, 2023. "Benefits and costs of the ETS in the EU, a lesson learned for the CBAM design," Working Paper Series 2764, European Central Bank.
    10. Delzeit, Ruth & Heimann, Tobias & Schünemann, Franziska & Söder, Mareike, 2021. "Who benefits really from phasing out palmoil-based biodiesel in the EU?," Kiel Working Papers 2203, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Heimann, Tobias & Delzeit, Ruth, 2024. "Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Massimo Bordignon & Duccio Gamannossi degl’Innocenti, 2023. "Third Time’s a Charm? Assessing the Impact of the Third Phase of the EU ETS on CO 2 Emissions and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Chien-Chiang Lee & Godwin Olasehinde-Williams, 2026. "The impact of the emissions trading system on foreign carbon embedded in domestic final demand: evidence from the Eurozone," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1-31, April.
    14. Flori, Andrea & Borghesi, Simone & Marin, Giovanni, 2024. "The environmental-financial performance nexus of EU ETS firms: A quantile regression approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Svetlana V. Doroshenko & Anna D. Mingaleva, 2020. "Carbon Exchanges: European Experience in Developing the Mechanism of Emission Permit Trading," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 52-68, August.
    16. Chen Shi & Yujiao Xian & Zhixin Wang & Ke Wang, 2023. "Marginal abatement cost curve of carbon emissions in China: a functional data analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-25, February.
    17. John Foster & Liam Wagner & Phil Wild & Junhua Zhao & Lucas Skoofa & Craig Froome, 2011. "Market and Economic Modelling of the Intelligent Grid: End of Year Report 2009," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 09, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    18. Michael Nippa & Sanjay Patnaik & Markus Taussig, 2021. "MNE responses to carbon pricing regulations: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 904-929, July.
    19. Fang, Sheng & Lu, Xinsheng & Li, Jianfeng & Qu, Ling, 2018. "Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of carbon emission allowance and stock returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 551-566.
    20. Badau, Flavius & Färe, Rolf & Gopinath, Munisamy, 2016. "Global resilience to climate change: Examining global economic and environmental performance resulting from a global carbon dioxide market," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 46-64.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.